Erk, I don't recall myself 'going on offensive'. I'm just curious of the CZ's performance hence I would appreciate it a lot if someone could post of side to side comparison between the Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 VS CZ 16-80 instead of saying 'ah, I feel this is sharp, that is sharp' kind of stuff. Afterall, it's for the benefit of the alphians too. At least you can just show someone the comparisons in case someone ask in future rather than telling them 'I heard from my next door aunty' kinda stuff.

Well, if you choose to listen blindly. You can always continue doing so.

p/s: No, I don't own a Sony Alpha anymore. If I'm still with my Alpha, I would have bought both, try and make comparison rather than telling people ' hey, I've just mildly molested it' or 'hey, someone told me it's sharper'.


This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Feb 8 2009, 07:33 PM

yea i like the 3200 too...more classy look with the grains...

btw..my flash batteries very tahan... my Camera's batt ran out 1st b4 the flash...hmmm.. 2500mAh batt only...if 2700mAh then...

i just use my beercan......

This post has been edited by ryzan76: Feb 8 2009, 07:44 PM

You've commented Tammy is sharper right? But you didn't post a comparison. So from where did you draw the conclusion?

Sound like 'ah, I feel this is sharp, that is sharp'.

To me its kinda funny when you ask someone for prove when you can't bring anything to the table since you gave your comment 1st?

To avoid joining the auntie league, how about some reviews?

No worries, I'm well aware that you ditched your A100 and made loads from it

Going to hit the sack now as it's late here, nights.

aiya, the gal worm ring d, of course ext flash loh

photo spam


this i take with tamron




my cz not arrive yet

This post has been edited by ryzan76: Feb 8 2009, 08:01 PM

It's even funnier to see people who can't even understand proper England. I mentioned I doubt, that's the reason I requested for someone to post a side by side comparison so that others can see better

Still too early to jump to the conclusion. It's not proven yet

He stepped on some blood or red paint?

This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Feb 8 2009, 08:16 PM

guys...what do you guys think of nikon d700..?any alpha can beat this in term of pic quality..damm thing quite tempting tho..colour r nice n sharp too if pair wif good lens...pls somebody pull me out from this feelings...huhuhuu

Just go for it.

The noise control is simply superb. Spec wise, can easily pawn A900

p/s: Btw where did you got poisoned by this beast?

This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Feb 8 2009, 08:19 PM

thats was paint.....hand that be painted

if u guys bought the latest DCM Malaysia u'll see this pic



This post has been edited by SHOfrE3zE: Feb 8 2009, 08:23 PM

Oh ok. Just noticed that it's a handprint

Congratz for being one of the selected one

havent try A900 noise control, cnt tell much..but yeah the noise control of D700 is superb!!! Try the D3 series! It is even better!!!!!!! ....i like D3 more than D700 (obviously haah)

This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Feb 8 2009, 08:35 PM

D3. cough cough. That huge beast gonna burn a bloody big hold in ya pocket weh.

it wont burn a hole in my pocket because i dun have such big pocket! (not capable:)) i was amazed with that cam (compared to my A200 la)....its superb la...

for D3, i dont even have enough money in my pocket wor.. need to borrow from ahlong..

saw some of their pics in this forum and their flickr...superb!

but a900 oso cuuun!

nice n sharp.. it's Tammy 1750 aite??

bought edi.. but didnt read yet.. btw, congratz bro

That's why even pro shooter like Ted Adnan migrated to D3 for some serious performance

Don't worry, slowly save up more by taking some part time job, who knows someday you'll be proud owner of D3

offtopic: are you jasinian? coz my friend use this nickname in school