i have a question:
what is the difference of Lenspen original and Lenspen Sensorklear?
Original not meant to clean the sensor?
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V20!, The Orange Legion
|
|
 Jan 24 2009, 12:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Jan 24 2009, 12:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
any particular reason why?i read both are carbon tips though:)
|
|
|
Jan 24 2009, 01:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
oic thanks...coz i`m contemplating to just get a blower+normal lenspen or sensorklear..i see some light grey patches in my pics and i wonder isit dust or dirt...hmm..
any idea what's the price for these items? thanks neway.. |
|
|
Jan 24 2009, 09:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
ryzan76 wah..how oh?
|
|
|
Jan 25 2009, 01:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
happy cny to all and have a safe journey back!
|
|
|
Jan 25 2009, 04:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
QUOTE(Ahmike @ Jan 25 2009, 02:54 PM) Read here for the color balance Pre TTL better or ADI?TYhttp://www.alphanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3489 Pre TTL (Through the lens) : A miliseconds burst of flash light will appear to measure the light onto the subject and record back into the camera. Once it calculated it will fire the real actual flash. ADI: Distance encoder (require lens that support it ). Will measure based on the focal length chipsets inside the lens and inform what the camera body to set for the flash.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 26 2009, 02:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
i dun have film leh...sunglasses can ar?
can anyone confirm that our camera is able to withstand such rays? (without UV filter) |
|
|
Jan 26 2009, 05:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
its raining and cloudy here..no eclipse for me...gonna wait till 2026:(
|
|
|
Jan 26 2009, 05:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
arh..i will be 41 hahha:(
|
|
|
Jan 26 2009, 07:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
No worries, it will be back on 2026
 Took these pix today at petaling street...classic petaling street houses (ontop of the shoplots) C&C please:)    This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Jan 26 2009, 07:42 PM |
|
|
Jan 26 2009, 08:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
haha, scary kar? I grew up in this particular building leh!
|
|
|
Jan 27 2009, 12:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
QUOTE(craziqbal @ Jan 26 2009, 11:55 PM) have you guys seen this? it was posted in ftz: wow so cheap..can buy oh..Nikon D300 : 1800RM NIKON D3 : 2200RM NIKON D90 : 1500RM CANON 40D : 1700RM CANOND 5D : 2300RM CANON 50D : 2100RM CANON 450D : 1600RM Send mail to us for more enquiries.   |
|
|
Jan 27 2009, 12:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
QUOTE(craziqbal @ Jan 27 2009, 12:19 AM) wah, the fella replied my email in 14 minutes! paypal?hmm...paypal should be safer then... |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2009, 12:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
QUOTE(raist86 @ Jan 27 2009, 12:31 AM) i don't mind the 24mm range on the wide end as i rarely use the 18- 25mm range on my kit lens anyway. Most of my shots are portraits and using wide distorts the face. A big no no. i replaced my kitlens with sigma 17-70.. I needed a wide and sharp lens. i dun mind that it is not fixed 2.8 because a flash is still needed for lo-light indoor shots...I've tried the tamron 17-50. TBH, not very impressed with the build quality. It's so so only. ...try the lens..its really sharp |
|
|
Jan 27 2009, 11:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
QUOTE(dinraxxx @ Jan 27 2009, 09:57 AM) yeah,mine also got some little dust on that piece of viewfinder..What is it anyways?? i think i read in lenspen.com that we should not blow air through the VF....hence i did not bother cleaning it...can anyone confirm this? Besides, how do u guys clean the rear glass of the lens? |
|
|
Jan 28 2009, 01:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
WindY2K: i chose the 17-70mm over the tamron 17-50mm f2.8 and siggy 24-70mm 2.8. The reason: I want a sharp lens and i hardly shoot with 2.8 (or lower)for group pics...(FYI, i shoot mostly indoor/party pix). F2.8 is a bit too shallow for me, and 24mm is a bit too tight on my aps-c(a200). i need a lens with a mdf that doesnt require me to get off from my sit just to shoot the person that is sitting next to me, (17-70 mdf=20cm). just my 2 cents...
|
|
|
Jan 28 2009, 01:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
same here, and i chose a kit replacement over a flash...my next gadget will be F58!
|
|
|
Jan 29 2009, 02:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
QUOTE(albnok @ Jan 28 2009, 09:49 AM) raist86: Should be around RM15xx-17xx. Yeah, windy2k, go try the lens and u will be amazed:)....mfd of 20cm is very useful (at least for me). I tried the lens in sg wang boeingWindY2K: The other thing which anybody who has tried the Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4.5 DC will notice, is the insane minimum focusing distance! At 20cm from the sensor plane to the subject, minus the length of the lens, and you have a lens that practically touches the subject! Try it! |
|
|
Jan 30 2009, 01:02 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
tried A700 today, love the feel of that machine!
Added on January 30, 2009, 1:03 am QUOTE(vandechrome @ Jan 30 2009, 12:44 AM) oh i see..i tot street price like dat one.. i wonder where did he buy that....its a bit exp though:( This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Jan 30 2009, 01:03 AM |
|
|
Jan 31 2009, 08:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
QUOTE(raist86 @ Jan 30 2009, 10:27 PM) deciding between the 3 lo. 17-50 is tempting, but ending at 50mm, it's a little short. siggy 24-70 pula got a history of gear stripping. Sigma malaysia only got 1 year warranty, anything happen after that 1 year, i can cry. it happened to me too...but i chose 17-70 to replacement my not-so sharp kit lens:)...i hardly shoot at constant 2.8 too...moreover, its not even enuf for indoor lo-light17-70 fits me the most. Just that, to spend 1400 for it, is it worth it? Since it doesn't have a constant 2.8 like the 17-50. Added on January 31, 2009, 8:46 amtry the lens...MFD of 20cm is really very FUN! some pix from 17-70 as promised » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Jan 31 2009, 09:48 AM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0462sec
 0.58
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 06:12 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.