greeting with photo...

c&c please~

crap i would be 50 something by then

lucky i'm still 30+ that time .. 

arh..i will be 41 hahha:(

i got the pics.But It's like bulan sabit andd the setting are like at night.Using polarizer also no use.

My advice is check very carefully. Something is fishy if seller dont want COD.
Price is way below street price. Could be stolen one.

today practice.. C&C pls....  

iso 100, f1.7, 1/1600s

iso 100, f1.7, 1/2000s

thanks..   
means eg 2.2, 2.8, 3.2?

guys just asking some opinion,

what other option I can do when I was trying to take waterfalls picture...
the problem was the situation was tooo bright,

where in Aperture mode I put my F number to the max value, which is 22 or 36, and ISO 100
my shutter speed still end up faster then 1/60 (which kinda too fast for me for taking water flows picture)

so even if In shutter mode if I set to 1/5 or 1/20 sec , the F number will blink2 at max value and I will end up getting overexposed picture,

well then, whats the solution for those problem? 

Spam a bit 
manual focus using bigbeercan 

got quoted RM 1400 for sigma 17-70 f2.8 - 4.5 from boeing. Is that price ok for the lens? going there to test on monday

hai all taiko..it's worth to sell kit lens 18-70mm to buy tamron 17-50mm f2.8 as replacement???

oh, thanks yea. btw, went using shutter priority. How to set the appature? i forgot lor.

deciding between the 3 lo. 17-50 is tempting, but ending at 50mm, it's a little short. siggy 24-70 pula got a history of gear stripping. Sigma malaysia only got 1 year warranty, anything happen after that 1 year, i can cry.

17-70 fits me the most. Just that, to spend 1400 for it, is it worth it? Since it doesn't have a constant 2.8 like the 17-50.

some not-so-macro pic..taken with my cz1680 this afternoon

cheap? let's see

a) Nikon 80-200 f2.8 is RM 3.8k or less.
b) Nikon 70-200 f2.8 VR is RM 6k or less.
c) Canon 70-200 f2.8 is around RM 5k or less.
d) Canon 70-200 f2.8 IS is around RM 6.3k or less.

note that c) and d) comes with stabilization, which unlike the 70-200 G, it provides you stabilized view on viewfinder.

i dare not correct you...me myself more newbie..   btw wht lens good to substitute kitteh 1870? I heard tammy1750 is nice? any other good lens?

The reason i want to replace kitteh 1870 is because image not sharp enough..colour nt vivid enough...so so bokeh only... Or maybe because my skill too newb? Juz giv some comment...harsh comment i would also accept 

thx for the reply...so u do agree tamron 1750f2.8 produce better IQ than kitteh 1870? whts the price for it?

ouch i think slightly out of my budget... any other good recommendation? budget around 1k...

IMO, kitlens can get sharp image, but u need to use F8 and smaller than that.. thats how my kitlens work la..

somehow i feel that 2470 is nt wide enuf on our non-full frame slr.....unless u hav another wide angle lens to support

carl zeis is over my budget la haha... Siggy 17-70 how much? constant aperture?

yea..im looking for constant aperture.. maybe wait till next year then get tammy1750