[attachmentid=1032658]

Just signed my S&P before going to MidValley.

I found something unclear about the agreement.

1) There is no relationship in the purchase agreement between the residential unit and carpark. However, there is such a relationship in the carpark agreement. Funny?

2) The selling point of 3-tier security is not stated in the S&P (the lawyer said that the developer will surely fulfill it. If I got doubts, I can use the "brochure" as a proof - sound fragile to me)

3) They are trying to push us to assign them (the lawyers) to be your solicitor to chase for the bank payment. They claimed that by doing so, the chance of late payment from the bank will be reduced significantly.
The 15-20 floors are open for sale. I asked my SA and he said that before this, they (or an agent) held them with hope to attract the foreign interest AND with hope that minimum 500k foreign purchase could be reduced - but it didn't materialize. The price difference is 10k.

For those below 15th floor, I could see around 70-80% sold out.
I've seen the carpark layout. I'm getting tandem parking 3rd floor, 5 units beside the lifts (my unit is on 12th floor). Although side-by-side carparks are more favorable, they are located further away from the tandem parking. This means that you will need to walk further before reaching the lifts.
In the expo, nothing much. I only saw one paying for booking fee