QUOTE(Soony @ Jan 21 2009, 09:29 PM)
This is quite a bias comment you know? Sony is not new into DSLR , they inherited Konica Minolta's technologies which is comparable with Canon and Nikon at the same time they are quite good.
Since you've posted many times before so I'll just let this pass by.. sigh by the look at this thread =.=
What I can tell to the rest who wants a reccomendation about cameras.. Go out and test it , hold it and feel it. If it suits u then it suits u.. if not then just move on. Asking for relevant information in Lowyat sometimes might be insufficient.
It's not bias. So you tell me - you inherit a business from your father and you call yourself a seasoned, veteran businessman when you've just merely acquired the company?
I have no comments against Konica Minolta - they produce fine cameras, but Sony just bought the TECHNOLOGY over, not the STAFF, the ones which produce the brilliant ideas.
Since Sony has produced the Alpha - they have just used KM technology and Sony's ideas. Does NOT mean that it's going to be the best.
QUOTE(kucingfight @ Jan 21 2009, 09:44 PM)
Sony A200/Nikon D60/Canon 1000D, all will work juz fine, i doubt u can tell the diff. Sony has the highest number of AF-9points
Again, i'm using sony myself, no complains. U can view the Sony's thread and gauge how 'good' it is. Put it this way, d60/1000d have their pros n cons too..
mm i noticed ur partly one sided, recommending 1000d as always. I guess u know Sony was from Konica Minolta rite? Ur point on having Too Many AF points with PnS, i don really get what ur trying to say. Having 9AF points IS useful. Let's say ur limited to a composition area, and if the subject is not insight of the AF points, ur AF area is not covering the subject. this is when more AF points is useful
Lol, can't agree much with you. well, if u noticed it was always 1000d

If you have too many AF points, you probably won't make full use of it if you're still a newbie to the DSLR world - therefore, you'll be using the DSLR with so many AF points just like how you would use a PnS...
QUOTE(joyyy @ Jan 21 2009, 11:30 PM)
Quoted for truth.
I myself am a Canon user, but I always encourage people to look at the A200.
Unlike what
toblerone said, I on the other hand think that Sony PnS are lousy and not worth a second look.
It's good to know that Konica Minolta ventured into the DSLR market earlier than both Canon and Nikon, which followed suit only a few years later.

As quoted in my first reply, Sony bought over Konica Minolta, they did not send all their DSLR staff to go learn from them. They just bought the blueprints and branded it with a new name - they didn't make it on their own. Their newer models are using bits and pieces they are learning from the older blueprints.