oh... ok. i knew it.

the funny thing is why in the first place. those sc designed for not supporting native 44.1? arent the market is flooded with 44.1 standard?

well, fine....

Last time I thought foobar was a kind of chocolate, that you can sample and see how it taste like. If you take the samples slowly, you get to taste it better as it melts in your mouth. But if you sample it like many many thousand times very very fast, you get mouth cramp. Your teeth become so bad that they drop off one by one over night. Then somebody answered my question, told me foobar is computer something something, that it is y2k compliant. I said does that mean reverse order will work, because normally it is a2z. She said no lah no lah, it is a software for playing music files. I thanked her then for questions to my answers. I asked her what is all these sampling going on, are they blood samples, urine samples, stool samples. She also say no. She said those are mostly fluid samples. If you use these samples on the computer, the whole computer can go bang! and you get to see some smoke. I said orrr .......

what r u trying to say here? no offense i dont get u.....

cheers!

To see if I can change the topic ........

we have other fb2k discussion such as foobar2k customization for visual enhancement/plugin..

whether you like it or not fb2k is among the software that can resample signal easily...and since it is in the audiophile section, i presume the previous discussions/argument is being properly carried out for the benefit of our community.

Cheers

This post has been edited by jigon: Oct 25 2008, 05:46 AM

I been using foobar since 2003, way before v0.9.

A Q&A thread could serve to point users to skins, plugins and resource links specific to the software, among other things related. BUT for topics such as resamplings which is so general and not players specific, it would be beneficial to everybody in this forum to have it discuss in a separate thread. I don't use WMP, but I can see its users benefit(?) from this too. Resampling is not exclusive to foobar.

Half the pages in this thread are devoted to resampling already. Maybe someone can start a new topic, like resampling in foobar and watch that bumped up to 50 pages in no time.

This post has been edited by BCurve: Oct 25 2008, 10:26 AM

ok lets go back to the original thread.....

well..the resampling argument actually indirectly 'marketing' this thread to good number of pages..since you dont want free marketing i'll stop discussing the resampling bla bla..

so, come on guys, someone pls give us new topic..so that we can 'discuss' for another half of this thread..

What DSP you currently used in foobar 2000? recommend me some please!!

Resampler [SSRC] Slow mode @ 44100
a lil bit of noise sharpening if ur speaker is less of treble..

that's it, try to keep it as original as possible when enjoying music..

Is that all? How bout resampler to 192kHz?

Why you need to resample? You might not hear the difference, and it just a waste of CPU processing power. You can try to use them as you wish, but I prefer no DSP at all, just ASIO and thats all

I'm using Convolver with impulses that emulate analogue tubes and Advanced Limiter at the end of the DSP chain

actually Resampler [SSRC] Slow mode @ 44100 is to make sure all the music is at 44100 coz some of the music might be at 48000..

original is the best in music..

mind to direct me where to download the plugin?

TQ

Plugin: http://www.foobar2000.org/components/index.html
Impulses: http://sjeng.org/foobar2000.html

There is also a DSP that emulate Tube sound

What I really like is a DSP to use Winamp only DSP (like AudioBurst or iZotope Ozone) on foobar2000, link is here

And the equalizer preset for foobar

thing is to avoid as much alteration as possible.

if the music itself starts at 48000Hz, why stop it from being 48000Hz?

Is ASIO = WASAPI = Kernel Streaming ????

Is it recommend to leave ASIO setting at the system tray icon to its default setting?

This post has been edited by Angel of Deth: Oct 27 2008, 03:59 PM