Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

PC Audio foobar2k Q&A, Guides, help & comments are welcome...

views
     
TSgac
post Oct 15 2008, 03:53 AM, updated 17y ago

Music Soul
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur


hi guys... notworthy.gif

jus in case is relevant, i m using z5500 + x-fi platinum fatality champion series

note: i only listen to CDs and NO other formats even the losses one (FLAC, TTA, Monkeys Audio) not to mentioned the lossy types. smile.gif

currently, does enjoy the WMP11 sound quality. And i do aware as some said the foobar2k + additional plugin is better, i wondering.

i download the lastest version of foobar2k with the additional 3rd party plugin, as follows: -

1) kernel streaming
2) Asio
3) DSP Delta
4) Secret Rabbit Code
5) Advance Control

Is the above, sufficient for GOOD AUDIO QUALITY? i do presume the ASIO plugin is sufficient right? icon_question.gif

Thanking u in advance notworthy.gif

cheers!!! thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by gac: Oct 15 2008, 04:51 AM
TSgac
post Oct 15 2008, 04:42 AM

Music Soul
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(mofonyx @ Oct 15 2008, 04:29 AM)
what's wrong with lossless formats? sad.gif
*
nothing wrong... but i only listen to CDs. smile.gif
TSgac
post Oct 15 2008, 11:57 AM

Music Soul
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur


huh..... just wanna compare both sound quality.
TSgac
post Oct 15 2008, 03:04 PM

Music Soul
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(dlyz @ Oct 15 2008, 12:45 PM)
Why do foobar2000 need asio? I tot totally no plugin is the most original sound?
*
QUOTE(Hitman66 @ Oct 15 2008, 12:48 PM)
To talk the truth when you got the decent soundcard like yours it's best if you just use the both plug-ins nothing else.The difference is unnoticable with my ears last time. nod.gif

try leaving it into this only :_

1 - Secret Rabbit Code
2. - ASIO plug-in
*
i tried foobar2k without plugins is sucks!!

ok.... i will try both plugin...
TSgac
post Oct 15 2008, 03:09 PM

Music Soul
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(DEVICLOT @ Oct 15 2008, 03:07 PM)
Using Secret Rabbit now. ASIO is juz for onboard soundcard? My fubar cant use it =.=
*
ok or not
TSgac
post Oct 15 2008, 03:25 PM

Music Soul
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur


what is the use of SRC???

i m currently using optical as output.

so is there any different optical & coxial cable??? cool.gif

This post has been edited by gac: Oct 15 2008, 03:28 PM
TSgac
post Oct 15 2008, 06:30 PM

Music Soul
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(andrekua @ Oct 15 2008, 06:27 PM)
First time I heard about Rabbit Code and its SECRET.

Anyway, just tried it and its pretty good at reducing sibilance. Thanks for letting know. Havent read much about audiophile stuffs lately. But it consume 25% of my P4 2.26GHz. Holy god...
*
huh resources hungry monster... i always thought foobar2k is lesser than WMP shocking.gif


Added on October 15, 2008, 6:31 pm
QUOTE(Hitman66 @ Oct 15 2008, 04:23 PM)
dude if you have any prob regarding to foobar pls use this guide

http://www.gempakstarz.com/gforum/viewtopi...=foobar#p334845
*
i like ur guide...... i oledi bookmark it long2 time ago. good job but maybe u need to update it rclxms.gif


just another retarded question. installing 2 players wont effect my WMP11 right? shakehead.gif

This post has been edited by gac: Oct 15 2008, 06:40 PM
TSgac
post Oct 15 2008, 08:14 PM

Music Soul
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur


thanks... wondering why there is no such thread before..... life on!!! rclxm9.gif
TSgac
post Oct 15 2008, 08:18 PM

Music Soul
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur


just tried out the foobar2k.... just wanna check my setting is ok blush.gif


Despite i installed the ASIODLL but it reflected CREATIVE ASIO. Anything wrong? blush.gif

Why it only show 16bit? cry.gif

user posted image

More than 20 mapping to done??!! Anything Wrong??? but i only listen to stereo so can i stick to 2 mappings???

user posted image

Despite i set to 96000KHz on the resampling rate but it appears only 44.1?? Why huh??

user posted image


thanks Sifu icon_rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by gac: Oct 15 2008, 08:44 PM
TSgac
post Oct 15 2008, 09:27 PM

Music Soul
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur


i m still debating on the quality for WMP & foobar2k...... hard to differentiate. i keep on repeatedly listening to one song. cool.gif
TSgac
post Oct 15 2008, 09:58 PM

Music Soul
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur


Is WMP11 producing 24bit output or even resampling???..... i wanted to see what WMP11 can do.... the point here is both WMP & foobar2k quality is almost matching.

**** I bought some good CDs 24bit 192Khz remastering one.... but why foobar2k only indicating it is a 44.1khz format???? this is suck!


but one thing i admit....foobar2k look nicer & consume lesser memory, 200% different at least rclxm9.gif

This post has been edited by gac: Oct 15 2008, 10:03 PM
TSgac
post Oct 15 2008, 10:27 PM

Music Soul
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(andrekua @ Oct 15 2008, 10:17 PM)
LOL...

Bro,

Remastering is like it said, altering/refining the original audio signal. However, audio files stored in Audio CD format is still bound to 44.1KHz. You can resample it as much as you like all the way to 96KHz but the original audio cd format is 44.1KHz which is what Foobar is displaying.

Get your info right first. That is the reason why many doubt that 24bit have any benefit over 16bit as the original audio CD format is 16bit 44.1KHz. Upsampling 16bit to 24bit would only introduce 0's for the remaining extra 8bits which is why so many people critise manufacturers saying 24bit will sound better as the original sound is just 16bit. There is no way for it to recover the loss data for the remaining 8bits.
*
omg..... shocking.gif

but infact those CDs sound better.... comparatively to some local ones.... is there anything to do with the recording???
TSgac
post Oct 16 2008, 12:39 AM

Music Soul
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur


so to cut it short in a layman term would be....

CDs is encoded to 16bits 44.1Khz from a 24bit 192Khz source. thus, in order to "enjoyed" the extra bits, thats why resampling comes in..... like the one in foobar2k or any other players.

can this be it???
TSgac
post Oct 16 2008, 01:25 AM

Music Soul
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(BCurve @ Oct 16 2008, 12:48 AM)
Can be any source, but most CD players accepts 16bit audio disc.  Depends on whether the extra bits are stored on the disc.  And if it is there, the drive can read them and the player can play them, correctly of course.
*
do u think mine can do it? blush.gif ...... X-fi Platinum Fatality Champion Series + Z5500 + DVD-RW (as player)
TSgac
post Oct 16 2008, 02:45 AM

Music Soul
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur


After much try & error, install, uninstall & such efforts sweat.gif testing, keep on testing, tweaking for hours .... blah..... whistling.gif just ensure that i m NOT bias.

Testing rigs = MY Gear (X-Fi Platinum Champion Series + Logitech z5500)
Listening Test = compare to my buddy's hifi set. (Primare CD-31 + Primare 1-30 Intg. Amp + Pro Ac Studio 140 Speakers)

Human tester tongue.gif = Myself, my wife, my buddy + GF, my 7 yrs old son & my 6 yrs old daugther....
Venue: my entertainment room (12' x 23')

CD tested: -

1) Best Audiophile Voices Selections
2) Lee Lessack, in good companion
3) Aiza, Open Arms
4) AURACLE, LESIEM
5) Musik Wie Von Einem Anderen Stern
6) Signature Audiophile Instrumentals
7) Acaustic Audiophile Voices

my conclusion is WMP11 vs foobar2k.... ultimately, WMP11 is the winner!!! rclxm9.gif

Music Clarity - WMP11
Instrument Detailing - WMP11
Voice/Vocal Projection - WMP11
Originality? - WMP11
Music Low Volume - WMP11
Music High Volume - WMP11
Bass - WMP11
User interface - WMP11 (b'coz WMP11 nothing to set!)
Player Outlook/Visual - foobar2k (5-star!!!)
Music Management - foobar2k (5-star!!!)


So i will stick back to WMP11... but again, its all depend on "individual ears". Or perhaps different combination of hardware & software produced different result (i strongly believe so) unsure.gif

NOTE: well i m not degrading foobar2k or any other players, this is purely my view. brows.gif

- One thing i learned, the speakers placement is significantly IMPORTANT whether is stereo or 5.1s. (lately, i did come across a few articles on speaker placement. Well, it is not ultimate but it does ENHANCE in a way cool2.gif

Cheers!!!

p/s: this thread should be continuing...

This post has been edited by gac: Oct 16 2008, 03:02 AM
TSgac
post Oct 16 2008, 11:35 AM

Music Soul
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(BCurve @ Oct 16 2008, 09:39 AM)
One of these days, switch over to foobar2000 without them knowing, ask them what they think of WMP11 ....... I know I know..... but just for the fun of it, and they will have their revenge.  rclxm9.gif
*
during my testing.... i tested both players without them knowing which is which.... my children does even know what is WMP11 or foobar2k shakehead.gif

btw what is the ASIO buffer latency? 80ms is ok?

how about buffer lenght???


This post has been edited by gac: Oct 16 2008, 11:50 AM
TSgac
post Oct 16 2008, 02:21 PM

Music Soul
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(dlyz @ Oct 16 2008, 01:10 PM)
How do you position your Z5500? I am a Z5500 user too smile.gif Hopefully can have some pics.

I have been searching to no avail, what is the best way to position speakers nearfield.

Would using Secret Rabbit Code be considered Colouring the music?
*
SRC is not consider a "colouring" device. SRC is a re-sampler. i.e. resampler from 44.1KHz to 96KHz..... etc

I presume stuff like SRS, 3FX, CMSS, equalizer, etc are "colouring" agents


There are many philosphies & theories... hard to say. but u cant try this

My speaker placement:

1) LF, RF & CF try to put it 3 feet away from the listening point. LF & RF 4ft away from each other. all MUST be "ear" level
2) All front speakers should be 1 feet away from your wall. (nearer u will get heavier bass/LFE)
3) Rear speaker must be at the back of course. but try to put it 3 feet up of your listening point/ear level.
4) Placement of subwoofer is important & complex...... but mine on the left side and leaving 1 feet gap between the wall & sub

try this: -------

1) www.polkaudio.com/education/article.php?id=20www.polkaudio.com/education/article.php?id=20
2) www.atlantictechnology.com/default.asp?IsDev=False&NodeId=108 www.atlantictechnology.com/default.asp?IsDev=False&NodeId=108

u need to try every position possible in order to get the best "point"

one thing, if u would to visit any hi-fi shop as u might realized that none of those speakers are place close to the wall. right? wink.gif

i m still in the learning stage now..... sweat.gif

This post has been edited by gac: Oct 16 2008, 02:27 PM
TSgac
post Oct 16 2008, 04:16 PM

Music Soul
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(tps18489 @ Oct 16 2008, 03:26 PM)
I tried using WASAPI. The problem is that it mutes any other sounds except the music, which is sometimes inconvenient. I tried ASIO and KS but they both don't work on my laptop. The option to select KS doesn't appear in the Output Device column. For ASIO, I get an error when I try to press the Add button. Any ideas? Thanks.
*
What OS r u using? WASAPI that is the point....

I m not sure about the KS issues. but maybe u paste wrongly to a different folders. it should be C:\Program Files\foobar2000\components

But for the ASIO, u need a sound card which support ASIO. U wont able to use it.

For non ASIO supprted SC, use KS only and should try out Secret Rabbit Code (SRC).

cheers!!!
TSgac
post Oct 16 2008, 07:09 PM

Music Soul
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(tps18489 @ Oct 16 2008, 06:05 PM)
I'm using Windows Vista. WASAPI is good due to the fact it bypasses the Windows mixer. As many have said, Windows Vista sound system has some problems which causes music to sometimes jerk during playback. I'm facing this problem. Using WASAPI solves the problem and I'm very happy about it. The only thing I don't like is that it mutes all other sounds. So I can't hear any alerts during playback.

I posted the dll file in the directory you mentioned. But I just don't see it there. Not sure why too. Maybe my soundcard doesn't support it or something.

Okay. I'll try it. I guess my soundcard doesn't support ASIO. Thanks for the information. smile.gif
*
maybe u should try updating your SC driver.....
TSgac
post Oct 16 2008, 09:09 PM

Music Soul
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur


can anyone show some pictures..... its better illustration right?

5 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0280sec    0.40    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 06:11 PM