Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Speedo meter reading is different from GPS?, Speedo meter reading is different.

views
     
TSadvanceNissan
post Aug 1 2008, 03:15 PM, updated 17y ago

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
205 posts

Joined: May 2008


Does anyone out there face the problem that the speedo meter reading is different from the GPS speed reading? Like when your speedo meter reading is at 110km/h, the GPS reading is only at 105km/h or already over the speedo meter reading like 120km/h?
LeVis_Jeans
post Aug 1 2008, 03:23 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
511 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(advanceNissan @ Aug 1 2008, 03:15 PM)
Does anyone out there face the problem that the speedo meter reading is different from the GPS speed reading? Like when your speedo meter reading is at 110km/h, the GPS reading is only at 105km/h or already over the speedo meter reading like 120km/h?
*
GPS is use satellite to calculate your location and speed. Speedo meter from your car is calculate direct from your tayer turning.
2 difference calculate but speedo meter more correct then GPS.
sleepwalker
post Aug 1 2008, 03:31 PM

Need sleep....
Group Icon
Staff
5,568 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: the lack of sleep


QUOTE(LeVis_Jeans @ Aug 1 2008, 03:23 PM)
GPS is use satellite to calculate your location and speed. Speedo meter from your car is calculate direct from your tayer turning.
2 difference calculate but speedo meter more correct then GPS.
*
A slight correction here. Speedometer calculation is done from gearbox turning and not and not really tyre turning. That is why if you change tyres to the wrong OD from OEM, the speedometer is no longer accurate as the manufacturer has tuned the speedometer to match the factory tyres.


Added on August 1, 2008, 3:33 pm
QUOTE(advanceNissan @ Aug 1 2008, 03:15 PM)
Does anyone out there face the problem that the speedo meter reading is different from the GPS speed reading? Like when your speedo meter reading is at 110km/h, the GPS reading is only at 105km/h or already over the speedo meter reading like 120km/h?
*
There is a 2 second delay for signals traveling from ground level to the satellites (and this is via big sat dish, would be longer for small GPS devices). The data will no longer be accurate.

The only accurate way to measure your speed is to use a speed camera. This gives you your Actual Speed. The next level of accuracy would be to use your speedometer. This gives you your Metered Speed.

Using GPS to track your speed will not be accurate as there is a latency in your GPS signal that would interfere in the calculations of your speed.

This post has been edited by sleepwalker: Aug 1 2008, 03:33 PM
scorgio
post Aug 1 2008, 03:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,694 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


QUOTE(LeVis_Jeans @ Aug 1 2008, 03:23 PM)
GPS is use satellite to calculate your location and speed. Speedo meter from your car is calculate direct from your tayer turning.
2 difference calculate but speedo meter more correct then GPS.
*
Nope, GPS is more accurate.

And that's why our PDRM allow a 10km/h difference b4 sending u a speeding ticket.

TSadvanceNissan
post Aug 1 2008, 03:46 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
205 posts

Joined: May 2008


Ya, I heard people said GPS is the most accurate way to know your vehicle speed. If not, satelite will cause a lot of error and all the telecomunication including Astro won't able to work properly liao because it is using digital.
sleepwalker
post Aug 1 2008, 03:49 PM

Need sleep....
Group Icon
Staff
5,568 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: the lack of sleep


QUOTE(scorgio @ Aug 1 2008, 03:39 PM)
Nope, GPS is more accurate.

And that's why our PDRM allow a 10km/h difference b4 sending u a speeding ticket.
*
That's where you are wrong. PDRM does not give you 10km/h difference. That's because they are capturing your speed from an angle. For speedo cameras to be accurate, it has to be shot directly in front of the car. Any angle will give you a variance. So actually, they are not giving 10km/h difference, it is just that they are always capturing a slightly slower speed than your actual speed. Furthermore, in most cars, there is a meter variance of up to 5% faster, meaning that your speedmeter is faster by up to 5% at 110km/h.

This combined with your actual speed taken at an angle, people end up with the urban myth that the police give you 10km/h more before saman. That is wrong because if you are travelling at about 120km/h on your speedometer, your actual speed is most probably around 115km/h with the police capturing your speed at 110km/h.
sevendogz
post Aug 1 2008, 03:53 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,276 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: Klg-Ktn-Klg-KK-PG-BM
JUST USE UR TACHYMETER...
LeVis_Jeans
post Aug 1 2008, 03:55 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
511 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(sleepwalker @ Aug 1 2008, 03:31 PM)
A slight correction here. Speedometer calculation is done from gearbox turning and not and not really tyre turning. That is why if you change tyres to the wrong OD from OEM, the speedometer is no longer accurate as the manufacturer has tuned the speedometer to match the factory tyres.

*
Thanks for correction.. thumbup.gif
But my GPS speed lower then my speedo meter.
I using garmin Q. hehehe

This post has been edited by LeVis_Jeans: Aug 1 2008, 03:56 PM
sleepwalker
post Aug 1 2008, 03:58 PM

Need sleep....
Group Icon
Staff
5,568 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: the lack of sleep


QUOTE(advanceNissan @ Aug 1 2008, 03:46 PM)
Ya, I heard people said GPS is the most accurate way to know your vehicle speed. If not, satelite will cause a lot of error and all the telecomunication including Astro won't able to work properly liao because it is using digital.
*
I'm not talking about error. I'm talking about lag. GPS speed calculation works by calculating your distance traveled divided by time. However, due to differences in the lag time that it take for the signal to get to the satellite. Since the lag time varies as you move, it affects the real time calculation of your speed.

Astro works fine with sats because they are streaming a constant rate to earth. It is not affected by the lag time. Have you tried internet communications over Sats? I have tried it from our very own Earth Satellite station in Bukit Jalil. Signal takes a minimum 240ms (average about 500ms) to get from earth to the sat (one way) and another lag of 240ms-500ms from Sat to earth.

Ok, I would not say that GPS is not accurate but rather it is not precise.


Added on August 1, 2008, 4:00 pm
QUOTE(LeVis_Jeans @ Aug 1 2008, 03:55 PM)
Thanks for correction..  thumbup.gif
But my GPS speed lower then my speedo meter.
I using garmin Q. hehehe
*
That's because your metered speed is always faster than your actual speed. The manufacturer's made it this way.

This post has been edited by sleepwalker: Aug 1 2008, 04:00 PM
LeVis_Jeans
post Aug 1 2008, 04:04 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
511 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(sleepwalker @ Aug 1 2008, 03:58 PM)
I'm not talking about error. I'm talking about lag. GPS speed calculation works by calculating your distance traveled divided by time. However, due to differences in the lag time that it take for the signal to get to the satellite. Since the lag time varies as you move, it affects the real time calculation of your speed.

Astro works fine with sats because they are streaming a constant rate to earth. It is not affected by the lag time. Have you tried internet communications over Sats? I have tried it from our very own Earth Satellite station in Bukit Jalil. Signal takes a minimum 240ms (average about 500ms) to get from earth to the sat (one way) and another lag of 240ms-500ms from Sat to earth.

Ok, I would not say that GPS is not accurate but rather it is not precise.


Added on August 1, 2008, 4:00 pm
That's because your metered speed is always faster than your actual speed. The manufacturer's made it this way.
*
Yes.. strong agree with him.
GPS lag.
GPS is using a device send keep send signal from your location to satellite, then receive signal from satellite and your device show which location you rite now.

Speedo meter from GPS is calculate how many meter you already pass per second.
Remember is how many meter already pass.. wink.gif
binary
post Aug 1 2008, 04:31 PM

PreBeT_LaPok
******
Senior Member
1,535 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: N3 07.190 E101 40.586



I am using GMXT and the speed reading in the GPS is same with my car speed.
scorgio
post Aug 1 2008, 05:01 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,694 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


QUOTE(sleepwalker @ Aug 1 2008, 03:49 PM)
This combined with your actual speed taken at an angle, people end up with the urban myth that the police give you 10km/h more before saman. That is wrong because if you are travelling at about 120km/h on your speedometer, your actual speed is most probably around 115km/h with the police capturing your speed at 110km/h.
*
If the police captured my speed at say 1km/h over 110km/h, then why the record on the saman or the picture taken will record 120 or 121 km/h?
SUSsharkteef
post Aug 1 2008, 05:03 PM

Not Godlike
*******
Senior Member
2,504 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Hollander


before u go on ranting bout GPS, do u even understand how it works ?
what type of GPS are u talking about ? aGPS ? or plain 1990's GPS ? HSGPS ?

and no, the GPS machine you have isnt accurate. whether its on a crummy i550 or N95 or garmin nuvi or tomtom or mio c230 or magellan its not accurate.
if it is, please head on over to mypdacafe.com and there'll be 1000 users waiting to buy the system from you to sell to the military. even military's high sensitivity receivers condones a .7 sec delay.

aGPS 7 HSGPS uses calculation correction methods to make it seem like its on real time but it just isnt. so u may be travelling 100km/h @ 12.09.0543am but in actual fact u're not.

like what sleepwalker has said, if u wanna know what speed u're at, on that current moment, use a speed camera. they exist for a reason.


btw there was once a court case hearing from a police officers son, who claimed the speed on his sat nav didnt tally with the speed camera captured. the judge ruled it out and arguments went on.
anyway the speed camera recorded the real deal and the judge ruled it in favor. i'll see if i can dig up that old news. it came out in the newspapers once in the star. forgot when.

This post has been edited by sharkteef: Aug 1 2008, 05:08 PM
Rusty Nail
post Aug 1 2008, 05:15 PM

Why am I still here?
*******
Senior Member
4,883 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Petaling Jaya



QUOTE(scorgio @ Aug 1 2008, 05:01 PM)
If the police captured my speed at say 1km/h over 110km/h, then why the record on the saman or the picture taken will record 120 or 121 km/h?
*
whatever your actual speed is.

what speedwalker pointed out is that speedometer reading and actual speed (laser speed trap camera or old fashion radar gun) might not be the same and are subjected to calibration tolerances.
TSadvanceNissan
post Aug 1 2008, 05:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
205 posts

Joined: May 2008


I have tried 4 different brands GPS at once and the result is the same, all also shown the same speed, but maybe some will a little bit slower, but not much, maybe less than 1 second, this is probably due to the processor speed, so I think the GPS is quite accurate kua.
SUSsharkteef
post Aug 1 2008, 06:00 PM

Not Godlike
*******
Senior Member
2,504 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Hollander


QUOTE(advanceNissan @ Aug 1 2008, 05:55 PM)
I have tried 4 different brands GPS at once and the result is the same, all also shown the same speed, but maybe some will a little bit slower, but not much, maybe less than 1 second, this is probably due to the processor speed, so I think the GPS is quite accurate kua.
*
and i highly agree with the words that u used. quite accurate is right.
sleepwalker
post Aug 1 2008, 06:00 PM

Need sleep....
Group Icon
Staff
5,568 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: the lack of sleep


QUOTE(scorgio @ Aug 1 2008, 05:01 PM)
If the police captured my speed at say 1km/h over 110km/h, then why the record on the saman or the picture taken will record 120 or 121 km/h?
*
How do you know that you were traveling at 111km/h and that they captured and recorded you as 121km/h? I don't quite get your point.
kenshin81x
post Aug 1 2008, 06:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
71 posts

Joined: May 2005


I think it depends on the GPS unit as well. I'm using a Garmin Nuvi and the speedometer in the GPS is very accurate when I'm travelling back to Ipoh from KL at highway speeds. I believe if tested on a windows mobile phone cum GPS, there's a noticeable lag.
sleepwalker
post Aug 1 2008, 06:05 PM

Need sleep....
Group Icon
Staff
5,568 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: the lack of sleep


QUOTE(sharkteef @ Aug 1 2008, 05:03 PM)
before u go on ranting bout GPS, do u even understand how it works ?
what type of GPS are u talking about ? aGPS ? or plain 1990's GPS ? HSGPS ?

and no, the GPS machine you have isnt accurate. whether its on a crummy i550 or N95 or garmin nuvi or tomtom or mio c230 or magellan its not accurate.
if it is, please head on over to mypdacafe.com and there'll be 1000 users waiting to buy the system from you to sell to the military. even military's high sensitivity receivers condones a .7 sec delay.

aGPS 7 HSGPS uses calculation correction methods to make it seem like its on real time but it just isnt. so u may be travelling 100km/h @ 12.09.0543am but in actual fact u're not.

like what sleepwalker has said, if u wanna know what speed u're at, on that current moment, use a speed camera. they exist for a reason.
btw there was once a court case hearing from a police officers son, who claimed the speed on his sat nav didnt tally with the speed camera captured. the judge ruled it out and arguments went on.
anyway the speed camera recorded the real deal and the judge ruled it in favor. i'll see if i can dig up that old news. it came out in the newspapers once in the star. forgot when.
*
I was just about to mentioned about crummy GPS systems aka RM2k types but you beat me to it. tongue.gif

I was trying to tell them about the lag as even BIG SAT DISH cannot beat the laws of physics. Fastest turn around time one way is about 240-250ms from earth to Sat. Combine that with the triangulation required, even the Military's super duper GPS will have a lag of 0.7 secs turnaround time as you mentioned. Some just don't understand and think that everything travels in the speed of light. Unfortunately, Sat comms signals do not travel at the speed of light.


Added on August 1, 2008, 6:08 pm
QUOTE(kenshin81x @ Aug 1 2008, 06:05 PM)
I think it depends on the GPS unit as well. I'm using a Garmin Nuvi and the speedometer in the GPS is very accurate when I'm travelling back to Ipoh from KL at highway speeds. I believe if tested on a windows mobile phone cum GPS, there's a noticeable lag.
*
That is why I mentioned earlier, it is not about the accuracy but rather the precision. The GPS would most probably be accurate if you travel in a constant speed in a constant direction as it can easily calculate the distance traveled and provide a more precise calculation. But once you start to slow down, change speed and direction, the calculation will not longer be so precise.

This post has been edited by sleepwalker: Aug 1 2008, 06:08 PM
SUSsharkteef
post Aug 1 2008, 06:41 PM

Not Godlike
*******
Senior Member
2,504 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Hollander


QUOTE(sleepwalker @ Aug 1 2008, 06:05 PM)
I was just about to mentioned about crummy GPS systems aka RM2k types but you beat me to it.  tongue.gif

I was trying to tell them about the lag as even BIG SAT DISH cannot beat the laws of physics. Fastest turn around time one way is about 240-250ms from earth to Sat. Combine that with the triangulation required, even the Military's super duper GPS will have a lag of 0.7 secs turnaround time as you mentioned. Some just don't understand and think that everything travels in the speed of light. Unfortunately, Sat comms signals do not travel at the speed of light.


Added on August 1, 2008, 6:08 pm
That is why I mentioned earlier, it is not about the accuracy but rather the precision. The GPS would most probably be accurate if you travel in a constant speed in a constant direction as it can easily calculate the distance traveled and provide a more precise calculation. But once you start to slow down, change speed and direction, the calculation will not longer be so precise.
*
you're welcome !

adding on...... nothing is real time ! not even calculations (based on moving vehicle because when u're stagnant why would it need to be real time anyway). if sat navs are all in real time + accuracy, our body would've been mutated by radiowaves and we'd all have cancer. i dont want cancer.
theanswer
post Aug 1 2008, 08:38 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,024 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Kajang


QUOTE(advanceNissan @ Aug 1 2008, 03:15 PM)
Does anyone out there face the problem that the speedo meter reading is different from the GPS speed reading? Like when your speedo meter reading is at 110km/h, the GPS reading is only at 105km/h or already over the speedo meter reading like 120km/h?
*
i'm driving myvi ezi..last week using my bro's n82 gps..the reading is almost exact.
neato4u
post Apr 2 2009, 06:03 AM

Cha La, Head Cha La!
******
Senior Member
1,664 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Ipoh

Fantastic thread! minus the comments from users which does not read and simply post based on their own findings, not facts.. ah sometimes ignorance is a bliss.. laugh.gif
ah liew
post Apr 2 2009, 10:43 AM

エンジンオイル
*****
Senior Member
829 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: ☆柔弗洲 to 沙巴★ Status: Dori Dori



QUOTE(neato4u @ Apr 2 2009, 06:03 AM)
Fantastic thread! minus the comments from users which does not read and simply post based on their own findings, not facts.. ah sometimes ignorance is a bliss.. laugh.gif
*
same to you, because you bump an old thread.
jacktai
post Apr 2 2009, 11:10 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
339 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: Cheras, KL


QUOTE(theanswer @ Aug 1 2008, 08:38 PM)
i'm driving myvi ezi..last week using my bro's n82 gps..the reading is almost exact.
*
Agree, I drive kancil, the GPS reading are same as the speedo meter. When I drive the old saga, which have about 10km/h faster then the GPS. Its even worst for motorbike, about 15-20km/h different.

Conclusion that Perodua had the most accurate speedo meter. So don't speeding, there is not tolerate variance for Perodua driver. thumbup.gif
blackmachine
post Apr 2 2009, 02:54 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
723 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: SG Wang Plaza



QUOTE(sleepwalker @ Aug 1 2008, 03:49 PM)
That's where you are wrong. PDRM does not give you 10km/h difference. That's because they are capturing your speed from an angle. For speedo cameras to be accurate, it has to be shot directly in front of the car. Any angle will give you a variance. So actually, they are not giving 10km/h difference, it is just that they are always capturing a slightly slower speed than your actual speed. Furthermore, in most cars, there is a meter variance of up to 5% faster, meaning that your speedmeter is faster by up to 5% at 110km/h.

This combined with your actual speed taken at an angle, people end up with the urban myth that the police give you 10km/h more before saman. That is wrong because if you are travelling at about 120km/h on your speedometer, your actual speed is most probably around 115km/h with the police capturing your speed at 110km/h.
*
i agree, example, if you have 2 set of tv, try to open same channel, let say, tv3 using normal and tv3 using astro, you can see that the tv3 using astro is slightly delayed
TSadvanceNissan
post Apr 2 2009, 06:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
205 posts

Joined: May 2008


QUOTE(jacktai @ Apr 2 2009, 11:10 AM)
Agree, I drive kancil, the GPS reading are same as the speedo meter. When I drive the old saga, which have about 10km/h faster then the GPS. Its even worst for motorbike, about 15-20km/h different.

Conclusion that Perodua had the most accurate speedo meter. So don't speeding, there is not tolerate variance for Perodua driver.  thumbup.gif
*
This is because your car is still in stock, nothing change, especially rims or tyres.
xshiro
post Apr 2 2009, 07:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



QUOTE(sleepwalker @ Aug 1 2008, 03:49 PM)
That's where you are wrong. PDRM does not give you 10km/h difference. That's because they are capturing your speed from an angle. For speedo cameras to be accurate, it has to be shot directly in front of the car. Any angle will give you a variance. So actually, they are not giving 10km/h difference, it is just that they are always capturing a slightly slower speed than your actual speed. Furthermore, in most cars, there is a meter variance of up to 5% faster, meaning that your speedmeter is faster by up to 5% at 110km/h.

This combined with your actual speed taken at an angle, people end up with the urban myth that the police give you 10km/h more before saman. That is wrong because if you are travelling at about 120km/h on your speedometer, your actual speed is most probably around 115km/h with the police capturing your speed at 110km/h.
*
i got warning before from police...speed limit there was 80...
on my meter shows 110.the police showed i was speeding about 123kmh..almost the same like ur theory..default rim was 14 ...changed to 15

This post has been edited by xshiro: Apr 2 2009, 07:29 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0219sec    0.77    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 02:13 PM