Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Speedo meter reading is different from GPS?, Speedo meter reading is different.

views
     
SUSsharkteef
post Aug 1 2008, 05:03 PM

Not Godlike
*******
Senior Member
2,504 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Hollander


before u go on ranting bout GPS, do u even understand how it works ?
what type of GPS are u talking about ? aGPS ? or plain 1990's GPS ? HSGPS ?

and no, the GPS machine you have isnt accurate. whether its on a crummy i550 or N95 or garmin nuvi or tomtom or mio c230 or magellan its not accurate.
if it is, please head on over to mypdacafe.com and there'll be 1000 users waiting to buy the system from you to sell to the military. even military's high sensitivity receivers condones a .7 sec delay.

aGPS 7 HSGPS uses calculation correction methods to make it seem like its on real time but it just isnt. so u may be travelling 100km/h @ 12.09.0543am but in actual fact u're not.

like what sleepwalker has said, if u wanna know what speed u're at, on that current moment, use a speed camera. they exist for a reason.


btw there was once a court case hearing from a police officers son, who claimed the speed on his sat nav didnt tally with the speed camera captured. the judge ruled it out and arguments went on.
anyway the speed camera recorded the real deal and the judge ruled it in favor. i'll see if i can dig up that old news. it came out in the newspapers once in the star. forgot when.

This post has been edited by sharkteef: Aug 1 2008, 05:08 PM
SUSsharkteef
post Aug 1 2008, 06:00 PM

Not Godlike
*******
Senior Member
2,504 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Hollander


QUOTE(advanceNissan @ Aug 1 2008, 05:55 PM)
I have tried 4 different brands GPS at once and the result is the same, all also shown the same speed, but maybe some will a little bit slower, but not much, maybe less than 1 second, this is probably due to the processor speed, so I think the GPS is quite accurate kua.
*
and i highly agree with the words that u used. quite accurate is right.
SUSsharkteef
post Aug 1 2008, 06:41 PM

Not Godlike
*******
Senior Member
2,504 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Hollander


QUOTE(sleepwalker @ Aug 1 2008, 06:05 PM)
I was just about to mentioned about crummy GPS systems aka RM2k types but you beat me to it.  tongue.gif

I was trying to tell them about the lag as even BIG SAT DISH cannot beat the laws of physics. Fastest turn around time one way is about 240-250ms from earth to Sat. Combine that with the triangulation required, even the Military's super duper GPS will have a lag of 0.7 secs turnaround time as you mentioned. Some just don't understand and think that everything travels in the speed of light. Unfortunately, Sat comms signals do not travel at the speed of light.


Added on August 1, 2008, 6:08 pm
That is why I mentioned earlier, it is not about the accuracy but rather the precision. The GPS would most probably be accurate if you travel in a constant speed in a constant direction as it can easily calculate the distance traveled and provide a more precise calculation. But once you start to slow down, change speed and direction, the calculation will not longer be so precise.
*
you're welcome !

adding on...... nothing is real time ! not even calculations (based on moving vehicle because when u're stagnant why would it need to be real time anyway). if sat navs are all in real time + accuracy, our body would've been mutated by radiowaves and we'd all have cancer. i dont want cancer.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0254sec    0.49    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 09:14 AM