QUOTE(kersing @ Aug 29 2009, 12:43 AM)
Brather kersing, where did U buy the iswara SE wooh? Did Proton come up with SE edition for Iswara?RPM reading @ 110km/h, survey
RPM reading @ 110km/h, survey
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 01:11 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
291 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Kedai Bakuteh Ah Kau Pte. Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 07:08 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
mine gen2 cps MT rpm 3.1k at 110km/h
|
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 02:24 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
11 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
|
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 02:35 PM
|
|
Staff
9,417 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Bladin Point, Northern Territory |
|
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 05:17 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
11 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
|
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 05:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,897 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
SEG AE 111 Auto
RPM at 2k when reach 110kph Iswara 1.3 2.5k when reach 110kph This post has been edited by feralee: Aug 29 2009, 05:41 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 05:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
492 posts Joined: Nov 2008 From: Boleh-Land |
Waja 1.6(M) Mitsu engine
110kmh --> 2.9k 140kmh -->4k 1) At 140kmh..the car feels more quieter..why?? 2) Izzit true that if we continuously drive our car at peak torque..we will get perfect fc from that engine? If i'm not mistaken..the mitsu waja peak torque is around 2.7k..so if i'm driving the car 2.7k engine speed..will i get more kilometers?(assume i'm using 5th gear la) |
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 08:28 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
QUOTE(SeNnDoh-7 @ Aug 29 2009, 05:59 PM) Waja 1.6(M) Mitsu engine i think its true 110kmh --> 2.9k 140kmh -->4k 1) At 140kmh..the car feels more quieter..why?? 2) Izzit true that if we continuously drive our car at peak torque..we will get perfect fc from that engine? If i'm not mistaken..the mitsu waja peak torque is around 2.7k..so if i'm driving the car 2.7k engine speed..will i get more kilometers?(assume i'm using 5th gear la) most of ic engine in car give similar FC trending.. lowest FC occur at the rpm of peak torque.. This post has been edited by pedanglaut: Aug 29 2009, 08:29 PM |
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 08:30 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 |
Peak torque.. Maybe and maybe not, try imagine that I drive my City at peak torque which is 4800 RPM... and in the highest gear 4800 RPM I don't know my speed until where already.
120 @ 2500 RPM, 140 @ 3000 RPM... If let's say it continues in this way, 4800RPM I am 220 KM/H.. |
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 08:35 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
QUOTE(ZeroSP @ Aug 29 2009, 08:30 PM) Peak torque.. Maybe and maybe not, try imagine that I drive my City at peak torque which is 4800 RPM... and in the highest gear 4800 RPM I don't know my speed until where already. there is different between car FC n engine FC IMO 120 @ 2500 RPM, 140 @ 3000 RPM... If let's say it continues in this way, 4800RPM I am 220 KM/H.. imagine cruising at 220 kph, drag force give most impact on FC i think.. |
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 08:43 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
291 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Kedai Bakuteh Ah Kau Pte. Ltd. |
QUOTE(pedanglaut @ Aug 29 2009, 09:35 PM) there is different between car FC n engine FC IMO Not 2 4get abt torque/weight ratio... directly propotional to fuel comsumption but inversely propotional to coefficient drag of aerodynamic.imagine cruising at 220 kph, drag force give most impact on FC i think.. |
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 09:39 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 |
Ya.. That's why I say not really driving at peak torque...
|
|
|
Aug 30 2009, 04:03 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
492 posts Joined: Nov 2008 From: Boleh-Land |
so can we say that if we continuously driving at peak torque we can get better fuel consumption?..i guess we can..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 30 2009, 05:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,952 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Aug 31 2009, 12:50 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,620 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Kuantan, Pahang |
toyota ke70 3.4k
|
|
|
Aug 31 2009, 01:10 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
104 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
tested my vios 09 just now, 2.7k at 110kmh
![]() |
|
|
Aug 31 2009, 01:11 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,620 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Kuantan, Pahang |
not bad what 1.5 ?
|
|
|
Aug 31 2009, 01:12 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
104 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
yeah, of coz. vios 1.5 engine only
|
|
|
Aug 31 2009, 01:15 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,620 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Kuantan, Pahang |
better than mine lol , mine 3.4k
|
|
|
Aug 31 2009, 01:55 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
104 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
| Change to: | 0.0277sec
0.40
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 06:46 AM |