Apr 19 2009, 03:24 AM
QUOTE(praetorian @ Apr 18 2009, 10:26 PM)
Looks like Djokovic is in the final took 3 sets to beat Warinka, next match is Murray Vs Nadal, hopes Nadal takes it, coz if not Murray could be World No:2 if he wins the tournament ,could be wrong abt that though.....
Nah.... Murray can't be no.2 just by winning Monte Carlo. He's still a few thousand points behind Fed, this is just a Masters series after all. Not a grand slam.Though, Murray just got beaten by Nadal.
QUOTE(diegoadriadona @ Apr 19 2009, 12:40 AM)
if to choose between sampras and agassi..i'd give more edge to aggasi..with all respect to sampras..agassi clawed his way back into the top draws when he was 30+ i think?? the oldest man to reach no.1 .. so all the credits goes to agassi...
Well federer on the other hand..only time will tell..he's mentality has certainly changed..from winning almost everything to suddenly losing to lower ranked players..kinda hard to take..no?
Agreed.Well federer on the other hand..only time will tell..he's mentality has certainly changed..from winning almost everything to suddenly losing to lower ranked players..kinda hard to take..no?
Agassi is absolutely awesome, he played in low-ranking tourneys right up to the highest in his 30's and claw his way back up. If Fed can do it, all respects goes to him.
Though Sampras at his prime was untouchable. His serve and volley tactics is hands down the best I've seen until today.
Quote
, football all show live then tennis only Grand Slam show fully live..
0.0283sec
0.71
6 queries
GZIP Disabled