QUOTE(kaiserreich @ Sep 25 2008, 07:06 PM)
I don't get what you are trying to say. With all due respect, it seems that you are just stating the facts without opinion or something.
For standard HDTV, we sit quite far from it so SD content would not look awful, but we are talking about monitors which most of us are sitting maybe around 1 - 1.5 m from, and the blocks certainly look bigger than as compared to a HDTV.
Given that : if most contents in your library are 1080p files, certainly there's no issues there with 1920x1200 being the best choice.
But if most contents are SD contents, we should still go for highres screen + >=24", is that what you say, even if you'll be seeing blocky images all the time? What I'm thinking is, with mostly SD content, maybe it's better to get a 22" with 1680 x 1050 or a HDTV with 1366x768 res, which would make the images look better, which you disagreed. Why is that?
Hmm, no offence taken, as you said I merely pointed out the facts of watching SD content on HD screens. (i.e it will appear blocky if stretched to full screen).
If you bought a Full HD display in the 1st place, it's because you want to enjoy Full HD material correct ? The downside of this though, is you will find your SD content looking blocky. So what would you do now ? enjoy Full HD (whenever you can, games, videos etc) and tolerate blocky SD video, or return the HDTV for a lower res monitor, so that the SD content displays better ? With a 24" LCD, you can afford to sit further than 1.5m.
"Most contents are SD" would be valid a few years ago, but now, even the TV shows floating for free are encoded in 720p (or higher). The only deciding factor to me would be the price of the display itself. Not the content.