QUOTE(lim47 @ Nov 5 2008, 09:47 PM)
Yes the n82 is better although the
c902 has 8.1 MP !!!
u mean c905 rite?

Added on November 5, 2008, 10:33 pmQUOTE(vexus @ Nov 5 2008, 08:54 PM)
sony using lousy lens, that's y all their photo not sharp n wash out.
maybe u r not aware, but from reviews like gsmarena n smape, they use latest FW n the pics produce by c905 can be on par with Innov8, sometimes slighty lower n sometimes slightly better.
QUOTE
Sony Ericsson C905 seems to have undergone a complete rehash of the image processing algorithm. The photos have vibrant and balanced colors and very mild sharpening. Noise is kept to really comfortable values for a camera phone. Chromatic aberrations even in high-contrast or underexposed areas are well under control. The purple fringing has almost completely gone. C905 produces astonishingly fine detail.--GSMARENA
QUOTE
As you see, the quality of color rendering, the sharpness and overall feel stay on a level and it’s hard to find a leader. In some pictures, we see C905 leading by a small margin, in others i8510 does a better work with a more precise focusing and color rendition.
The camera of Sony Ericsson C905 has its strengths and weaknesses. On the one hand, it can’t offer an image quality as good as that of Samsung’s; on the other hand, it is backed up by a xenon flash ensuring more advantageous night shooting conditions than i8510 has to face with its much weaker LED flash. Likewise the xenon flash gives the C905 an advantage at close-range indoor shooting. C905 manages to take nighttime portraits (e.g. at a party) in good quality, a goal out of Samsung’s reach.
That’s why there’s no distinct winner in this competition, either of the two models serving better for accomplishing specific tasks. If you take a special focus on nighttime shooting, C905 would be a better option. Otherwise you may take the advantage of the slightly superior quality of daytime shots that is observed with Samsung i8510. --SMAPE
This post has been edited by squall_kay: Nov 5 2008, 10:33 PM