Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

40 Pages « < 18 19 20 21 22 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Overclocking E7XXX Series

views
     
nidzamputra
post Aug 12 2009, 11:45 PM

newbie
*******
Senior Member
3,890 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur > Kuala Ketil > Kuala Muda
using xigmatek thor hammer...
farscope
post Aug 19 2009, 01:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,427 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Gangster Paradise


i juz installed xiggy RS to my E7400 yday..

but my idle temperature for
Core #1 is 40°C n never drop below tat..
Core #2 drop to around 30~33°C..

currently 3.2Ghz at max load 58°C
is that normal or i din seat my HSF properly?
OC4/3
post Aug 19 2009, 03:17 PM

.
Group Icon
Elite
4,746 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Speed rule


QUOTE(farscope @ Aug 19 2009, 01:42 PM)
i juz installed xiggy RS to my E7400 yday..

but my idle temperature for
Core #1 is 40°C n never drop below tat..
Core #2 drop to around 30~33°C..

currently 3.2Ghz at max load 58°C
is that normal or i din seat my HSF properly?
*
I think your core 1 temperature sensor is stuck laugh.gif
chchyong89
post Aug 19 2009, 03:22 PM

shittie mittie
******
Senior Member
1,293 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Ladang


my E5200 core 1 temperature also stuck.. sweat.gif
never go below than 38, while my core 0 minimum can beyond 29~30

This post has been edited by chchyong89: Aug 19 2009, 03:25 PM
farscope
post Aug 19 2009, 04:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,427 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Gangster Paradise


QUOTE(OC4/3 @ Aug 19 2009, 03:17 PM)
I think your core 1 temperature sensor is stuck laugh.gif
*
but before tis when using stock cooler.. it shows min 38 or 39°C.. now stuck at 40°C pulak..

i scare i din seat my HSF properly.. but load test temperature seems nice..
JoBigShow
post Aug 24 2009, 04:02 AM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


Using E7400 400 x 9 @???voltage (still in the process of finding the right stable volts)

Regarding Prime95, when using the torture test, which one should I choose to find the right stability for the cpu's voltage?:

1. Small FTT's
2. In-place Large FTT's
3. Blend

I'm pretty bump coz I got errors when running 'Blend' up to 1.42v, I'm informed that 1.3625v is recommended as maximum increments, and 1.4v+ is really pushing it. Is it just that my chip is bad that i gotta push above 1.45v+ to be stable?

In 'small FTT's' i havent encounter any error so far, is 'small FFt's' the one I should be running?

icon_question.gif


dun_panic
post Aug 26 2009, 12:44 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
433 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: Kay Bee~Kay Eyy


just run all the test to make sure ur system r rock stable, better if u run it 24hours
JoBigShow
post Aug 27 2009, 07:01 AM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(dun_panic @ Aug 26 2009, 12:44 AM)
just run all the test to make sure ur system r rock stable, better if u run it 24hours
*
How do you know when u have enough voltage or too much voltage? at the moment I'm within 1.34v-1.3625v@ 3.6ghz, I hope that's adequate enough. Do you guys know whats the territory (in terms of voltage) for 4.0ghz for E7400? Hope its doesn't have to reach up to 1.41v...I've read somewhere some guy rev up his e7400 up to 1.5v+ @4.0ghz, that's just plain ridiculous...
8tvt
post Aug 27 2009, 09:05 AM

Peace Lover
*******
Senior Member
8,753 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
not ridiculous.. can boot on 4ghz between stable..is different..
and not all proc are same..
kayQay
post Aug 27 2009, 11:18 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
10 posts

Joined: May 2008
QUOTE(JoBigShow @ Aug 24 2009, 04:02 AM)
Using E7400 400 x 9 @???voltage (still in the process of finding the right stable volts)

Regarding Prime95, when using the torture test, which one should I choose to find the right stability for the cpu's voltage?:

1. Small FTT's
2. In-place Large FTT's
3. Blend

I'm pretty bump coz I got errors when running 'Blend' up to 1.42v, I'm informed that 1.3625v is recommended as maximum increments, and 1.4v+ is really pushing it. Is it just that my chip is bad that i gotta push above 1.45v+ to be stable?

In 'small FTT's' i havent encounter any error so far, is 'small FFt's' the one I should be running?

icon_question.gif
*
I have same question.....which one to choose
1. Small FTT's
2. In-place Large FTT's
3. Blend

Any otai here can answer ? biggrin.gif

8tvt
post Aug 27 2009, 12:03 PM

Peace Lover
*******
Senior Member
8,753 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
use blend - cpu & ram stressed
JoBigShow
post Aug 27 2009, 06:13 PM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(8tvt @ Aug 27 2009, 09:05 AM)
not ridiculous.. can boot on 4ghz between stable..is different..
and not all proc are same..
*
Even though its a RM400 chip doesn't mean we should blow it up. rclxms.gif
Different processors are unique which makes OC'ing fun i guess.
I think my chip aint that bad coz I dont need to juiced it up to 1.45v+ to get stable @ 4.0ghz. For now...

8tvt
post Aug 27 2009, 06:24 PM

Peace Lover
*******
Senior Member
8,753 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
than it's normal for E7400..
my E7200 1.4v stable @ 3.8ghz
4ghz need 1.6v..
nidzamputra
post Aug 27 2009, 07:05 PM

newbie
*******
Senior Member
3,890 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur > Kuala Ketil > Kuala Muda
mine E7200 @4.0ghz need 1.36v
8tvt
post Aug 27 2009, 07:16 PM

Peace Lover
*******
Senior Member
8,753 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(nidzamputra @ Aug 27 2009, 07:05 PM)
mine E7200 @4.0ghz need 1.36v
*
maybe mine old crappy one.. haha..
nidzamputra
post Aug 27 2009, 07:51 PM

newbie
*******
Senior Member
3,890 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur > Kuala Ketil > Kuala Muda
hehehehe

maybe i'm lucky to get this gem..hehehe
JoBigShow
post Aug 27 2009, 08:20 PM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(kayQay @ Aug 27 2009, 11:18 AM)
I have same question.....which one to choose
1. Small FTT's
2. In-place Large FTT's
3. Blend

Any otai here can answer ? biggrin.gif
*
In 3 days of hard research on google, sweat.gif I learn that 'Blend' is the more suitable candidate for trying to find the stability in your system becoz its more practical. This is bcoz 'Blend' (stressed both cpu and ram) works how PC should work, by applying both usage of CPU and RAM simultaneously.

Small FFT's is a more theoretical approach if u want to know your proc more closely/intimately. (used a lot in OC contests)

Large FFT's is also theoratical if u wanna know the maximum level your whole system can endure, which stressed mostly everything in your system like PSU, CPU, RAM, capacitors of the mobo, etc. Beware, this one heats the pc like hell, my cpu temp reached up to 75c+ on load even though i have aftermarket cooler: Artic Cooling Freezer Xtreme. Large FFT's is the favourite of hardware manufactures to test their products to the max.

hope anyone else can verify me on this... nod.gif


farscope
post Aug 28 2009, 12:21 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,427 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Gangster Paradise


QUOTE(JoBigShow @ Aug 27 2009, 08:20 PM)
In 3 days of hard research on google,  sweat.gif I learn that 'Blend' is the more suitable candidate for trying to find the stability in your system becoz its more practical. This is bcoz 'Blend' (stressed both cpu and ram) works how PC should work, by applying both usage of CPU and RAM simultaneously.

Small FFT's is a more theoretical approach if u want to know your proc more closely/intimately. (used a lot in OC contests)

Large FFT's is also theoratical if u wanna know the maximum level your whole system can endure, which stressed mostly everything in your system like PSU, CPU, RAM, capacitors of the mobo, etc. Beware, this one heats the pc like hell, my cpu temp reached up to 75c+ on load even though i have aftermarket cooler: Artic Cooling Freezer Xtreme. Large FFT's is the favourite of hardware manufactures to test their products to the max.

hope anyone else can verify me on this... nod.gif
*
how does this compare to the simple LinX?
JoBigShow
post Aug 28 2009, 08:33 AM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(farscope @ Aug 28 2009, 12:21 AM)
how does this compare to the simple LinX?
*
LynX measures the CPU performance in Gflops. (It's something i havent heard of apart from the more familiar Lucas-Lehmer test.)
This pretty popular among russian overclockers.
LynX stressed the cpu way more than Orthos and Prime95.
It is claimed that LnyX saves more time bcoz 1 hour of LynX stressed test is equivalent to 6 hours of stressed test performed by prime95.
Bcoz of this, it is known that LynX raised up more higher temps than u get when running 'Large FTT's' on prime95. e.g 10c-15c more!
So u have to be careful when leaving u'r PC unattended when running this software.
(Large FTT's on prime95 already makes my cpu really hot, i will expect this software to raise my cpu temps up to 80c, even with my Artic Cooling Freezer Xtreme.) rclxub.gif

Here's a thread on Lynx from the original creator:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=201670

I'm gonna try this 'linpack interface' soon...


8tvt
post Aug 28 2009, 09:13 AM

Peace Lover
*******
Senior Member
8,753 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
i got 90C..

40 Pages « < 18 19 20 21 22 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0235sec    0.79    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 05:39 AM