Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Overclocking E7XXX Series

views
     
JoBigShow
post Sep 1 2009, 10:18 PM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(nidzamputra @ Sep 1 2009, 12:22 PM)
nevermind bro..i'm already tired to troubleshoot my DFI...

hehehe..finally i got replacement mobo already..got TPower I45..waiting for shipment...

later i will post the result for my replacement mobo...
*
I always been planning to get that board! i'm dreaming to CF my 4870 drool.gif
Some people underestimate that board but the Tpower can performs as good as those high end mobo like
MSI Platinum, ASUS M.F II, DFI LanP LPDK P45, Asus Striker2 Formula, etc...
How much it cost u bro??? brows.gif

Yes, report back on how the TPower overclocks u'r E7200, maybe 4.2Ghz tongue.gif
JoBigShow
post Sep 4 2009, 12:02 AM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(hantu667 @ Sep 3 2009, 08:56 PM)
want to ask..what p35 best oveclock mobo..abit p35E??
In the class of P35, the abit doing pretty good in OCing, but it has a rival in competition:
DFI Blood Iron P35-T2RL
Price: RM340@ LYPlaza.
These two board has always been competing with one another..(equivalent to the rivalry of Subaru impreza WRX sti vs. Mitsubishi Evo) nod.gif
But this was back years ago, its just up to what u prefer...
The abit is better looking, but the DFI may look simple, but it got tricks up its sleeves.
pic:
http://www.tweaktown.com/popImg.php?img=dbll_5.JPG

As for your mobo, the msi p43-neo 3 should have no prob OCing the E7400 more than 3.6ghz.
Most E7400 can run 3.5ghz@ stock vcore/"automatic", 1.35v is in the region of 3.8ghz-ish. (hell some chip can run 4.0ghz on that vcore.)

The real power of CM Extreme 460 is about 435w, hope this is enough for OCing hmm.gif
U can calculate the Watts usage in your entire system here, just in case:
http://extreme.outervision.com/psucalculatorlite.jsp

What the temp of u'r E7400? Do you use after market CPU coolers? One thing i can thinks of right now due to insufficient info:
The cpu might reached a certain Autoshutdown when reached TJMax or BIOS auto shutdowns when cpu temp reached 90c plus(or what the bios specifies)...

333 x 10.5, are using 677mhz rams? Btw, is your 'FSB to Northbridge strap' set to 333 as well? need a little more info bro tongue.gif

This post has been edited by JoBigShow: Sep 4 2009, 12:04 AM
JoBigShow
post Sep 4 2009, 01:17 AM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(farscope @ Sep 4 2009, 12:49 AM)
i did try running 333x10.5 with auto Vcore, tat shoots up to 1.31V shown in cpu-z..  rclxub.gif

as i mentioned earlier i set my Vcore to 1.28750V to get a stable 333x10.5..

do u remember how much is yr voltage when u set it auto?
*
For my previous 334 x 10.5; I think it was around 1.26v, with v-droop it was 1.242v in CPU-Z.
Plus I was using Artic Cooling Freezer Xtreme that time, maybe the low temps contribute to my stability @ that vcore settings. hmm.gif

Just to remind u i used that setting bcoz thats the maximum ghz you can get if you use DDR2 667mhz ram to get that 1:1, nod.gif
now i'm using hyperx 800mhz, my usual preset of OCing is: 3.4ghz, 3.6ghz, 3.8ghz, 4.0ghz, etc.....

These days I'm experimenting on how much FSB can my mobo handle, (ASUS P5QL-Pro) latest trial is:
FSB 420 : DRAM 841mhz (1:1), i have to increase the hyperX from 1.8v to 2.0v to be stable, but fails at times..probably because to changed my timing from 5-5-5-15 to 4-4-4-12... sweat.gif
Still in the experiment phase though.. tongue.gif

JoBigShow
post Sep 4 2009, 01:30 AM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(hantu667 @ Sep 4 2009, 01:17 AM)
what +12v mean..
n how to make it higher bro..
*
There's two version of CM Extreme 460; one is the one u'r using currently and 2nd is the newer one : CM Extreme 460 Plus
the 'CM460 Plus' has revised railings for the +12v since the older version has encounter lots of problems in term of railings and low true power output..
as low as 430w-ish of true power if i remember..

Yes your +12v is pretty low, should be at least 11v minimum, 11.8v average.

This post has been edited by JoBigShow: Sep 4 2009, 01:34 AM
JoBigShow
post Sep 4 2009, 01:49 AM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(hantu667 @ Sep 4 2009, 01:35 AM)
mine is xtream power plus..
i will try that.. rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif
*
If its Exreme power plus, then the problem might be elsewhere.
(i'm not an electrician, but u'r +12v is STILL pretty low, probably i'm just wrong about the CM 460Plus,
maybe the CM460Plus hasnt improve much on its railings... hope any other CMextreme+ users can clarify me on this)


But of course still cant ruled out the possibility of PSU insufficient power output.
I think you should try very troubleshoot possible before deciding to buy new PSU's,
but if u got the $$$, a new PSU is somewhat recommendable and a good investment in the future u want to upgrade hardware bro nod.gif


JoBigShow
post Sep 4 2009, 03:35 AM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(hantu667 @ Sep 4 2009, 02:20 AM)
p/s..i try 3.65ghz with 1.36 vcore..stable.. rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif
about 12v--still cannot solve..still at 10.++..hahha
*
3.65ghz, whats u'r FSB now??? If its 400 and slightly above, then its good when running with DDR2 800. I think when u were OC'ing @3.5ghz, u downclocked u'r DDR2 800mhz DRAM to 678mhz-ish, which i presume might cause some instability. Maybe all these time the problem has to do with the Dram freq., not the Vcore because E7400 @3.5ghz does not really need to be push up to 1.35v...(maybe those unlucky chips might have to)

When u'r using DDR2 800, its recommended to OC u'r CPU to: (IMO nod.gif )
3.4ghz (400 x 8.5)
3.6ghz (400 x 9)
3.8ghz, (400 x 9.5)
4.0ghz, (400 x 10)
etc..........
^^^This is a common baseline for overclocking CPU with DDR2 800. (without needing to OC the DRAM) Later u can fine tune...
And as a bonus you obtain the FSB to Dram ratio of 1:1 biggrin.gif

With the FSB maintain at 400,(or slightly above) u dont have to overclocked/downlocked u'r DRAM frequency.
When OC'ing DRAM, usually need to alter the DRAM voltage or choose a compatible settings for 'clock twister' for stability.
e.g. my DDR2 is at 820mhz(410mhz)@1.9v; or 840(421mhz)@2.0v to remain stable.
But right now i'm on stock 800(400mhz) @1.8/AUTO.

Yeah the amps of the railings u cannot do anything about it once you bought a PSU.
But i think u'r PSU is good enough when u are currently using 9600 GT.
(FYI, 400w of real power and 26Amps on the 12v rail (combined) is more than enough for this card)

HD4850, 4870, 9800GT, GTs250, etc.. has drop its price significantly these days, just FYI if u'r planning to get those GC,
u at least need PSU with 500w+ of real power; 600w+ real power for SLI and C.Fire nod.gif

Anywayz, try playing around with those settings i recommend above and report back bro,
bcoz these are valuable data/info for all other E7xxx users to read. thumbup.gif
JoBigShow
post Sep 4 2009, 10:36 PM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(hantu667 @ Sep 4 2009, 03:22 PM)
BRO..I CANT SET TO 400 X 9 FSB..
IT WILL SHOW PREVIOUS OC IS FAILED..
EVEN I SET  fsb to 400 x 7 is oso failed.. rclxub.gif  rclxub.gif

one more, is it ABIT IP35-E about 150 is worth to buy??
*
Man that's unlucky cry.gif It's the mobo...

ABIT IP35-E is RM350 brand new @LowYatPlaza, The DFI i reccomended earlier is RM340 @LYP. If u got the cash, there's another P35 mobo, buts its consider expensive if u'r in a budget:
MSI MS-7345 P35 PLATINUM (2 PCIE=Crossfire) @RM490 LYP.
pic:
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/fullimage.php?image=7419
Its doesnt always have to be P35 bro, u just need to find another P43/P45 mobo, e.g. like Gigabyte EP43-UD3L, Asus P5QE,
Jetway JXBLUE-P45(this one fetured in Goldfries's review on OCZ 1.2ghz in GameAxis magazine) Asus P5P43TD (DDR3), Biostar TP 43, etc...
(all the mobo above budget less than RM350)

or if u feel lucky u can go hunting in LYN garage sales for a bargained price thumbup.gif


JoBigShow
post Sep 4 2009, 11:00 PM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(farscope @ Sep 4 2009, 10:37 PM)
juz check in bios.. it shows 12.429V.. phew..

anyway, +12Va with 18A good enuf? hmm.gif
*
18Amps per single +12V railings is above enough or standard nod.gif

I'm using FSP Epsilon 80Plus 600w, with 64Amps, combination of 4/quad +12v railings of 18Amps each.
JoBigShow
post Sep 4 2009, 11:21 PM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


^^^whats psu u using bro?

This post has been edited by JoBigShow: Sep 4 2009, 11:21 PM
JoBigShow
post Sep 4 2009, 11:56 PM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(farscope @ Sep 4 2009, 11:33 PM)
Gigabyte superb 550W onli..
*
Yes, the gigabyte has double railings of +12v, in which 360w/+12v = 30A combined.

Attached Image

This post has been edited by JoBigShow: Sep 6 2009, 08:02 AM
JoBigShow
post Sep 5 2009, 03:12 AM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(hantu667 @ Sep 5 2009, 01:34 AM)
ok2 bro..thankz .. notworthy.gif

i hear that p35 n 45 chipset will more excellent in oc..rite??
*
First of all,
The main difference is the CFire setup, the P35 has a x16 - x4 arrangement and the P45 has a x8 - x8 for both of the PCI-E graphic slots.
the P45 uses the newer ICH10 southbridge, the P35 uses the older ICH9. Not too much difference. But of course the p45 is the more newer/updated chip.

45 chipset will more excellent in oc..rite??

Intel claims that p45 does slightly better in Oc'ing compare to p43.
Attached Image

Just for your info, a p43 and p45 'almost' the same thing, (probably is, because the are manufactured with the same crystals)
but the main difference is that p45 is CFire capable and the p43 can't.

But there are few mobo's out there that have p45 chipset but does not utilize CF.
Some say it's a 'marketing gimmick' when it comes to such mobo's such as for example;
Gigabyte EP45-UD3L, MSI 7514 P45 Neo3-FR, Asus P5Q Turbo, etc......
This is because these mobo's use p45 chipsets but doesnt offer CF, which means u pay more unnecessarily for a mobo with chipset the similar performance as p43. But is that true? hmm.gif (the rest is better to be discussed in another thread unfortunately)..

My opinion is as such:
- P43 fsb overclocking is supposedly going to be restricted to 400-425fsb, but p45 can go moderately over that.
- If u'r not planning to go CrossFire the P43 is adequate.
- If u still not planning to go Crossfire but want a slight edge in OC'ing, go for the p45.
(Me personally will go for the p45 CF enabled mobo BUT if u don't want the CF option, the p43 is good enough and save some $$$. ) thumbup.gif
- p45 is probably a more updated version to p35 if u have trouble with which one to buy
- non-CF p45 mobo's cost more than p43 and p35

Overall i think u should get the p43 mobo's if u plan to use DDR2 800 because u dont need to go over 400fsb to get the 1:1 ratio,
get a p45 mobo if u plan to use DDR2 1066 & DDR2 1200 to get FSB up to 533..


To conclude in a logical sense, get a p43 mobo's if u are in a budget because you still can get 4.0ghz+ from the CPU. (400fsb~425fsb X 10~10.5)
But if u have some extra $$$, a tad more OC'ng headroom and won't mind emending to the 'marketing gimmick', its your choice to get the non-CF p45 mobo's.
Get a p35 mobo's if u want 'the reasonable of the p43 mobo's' and 'the similar performance of a p45 mobo's, but suffer a little from the older southbridge.




(man the thread is seriously getting out of its real topic lately............E7xxx. I have the funny feeling i might have cause it ever since i enter this thread) laugh.gif

JoBigShow
post Sep 5 2009, 03:35 AM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(campsol2k @ Sep 5 2009, 02:16 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


12V rail for that PSU is actually 32A max allowed when combined both rails...
if hardware already accomodates 18A at 12V1 rail and balance capacity for 12V2 is 14A... vice versa...
ie..
12V1 =16A,12V2=16A...
12V1 = 17A, 12V2=15A
*
I see...its equilibrium. So the max for 1 railing is 18Amps on that psu. How do you know its max Amp? whats the calculation?

Here's my PSU info:
Attached Image

so for my quad +12V, if one railing occupies 18A, the rest of the 3 unoccupied railings will have a shared/unshared Ampage of???
(at the moment all me rails are occupied)
In fact where does it written on the PSU details above of how much Max Ampage my psu have. Is it 60Amps?(just guessing)

I knew it i was suppose to pay more attention to Physics in high school doh.gif

This post has been edited by JoBigShow: Sep 5 2009, 03:40 AM
JoBigShow
post Sep 5 2009, 05:53 AM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(campsol2k @ Sep 5 2009, 05:12 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

Sorry.. i made a mistake earlier. The correct value is 30A.. U can refer to the label on both column "12V1 and 12V2" and row "max combined  wattage"... 360W divide by 12V = 30A (Note..power law equation  Power=Current X Voltage )...

As 4 your PSU.. Its simple actually.. simple mathematics... nothing to do with physics except the power law....
575W (combined {+12V} + {+3.3V} + {+5V} rails) - 155W (combined {+3.3V} + {+5V} rail) =  420 W capacity@12V rails  (equivalent to 35A)
*
Thanks for the schooling, biggrin.gif the equation 'Power(W) = Current(A) X Voltage(V)' is such a basic formula, doh.gif but the last time i was in high school was years ago....

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

My former math teacher must be disappointed if he knows i forgot his teachings... sweat.gif


Added on September 5, 2009, 6:08 amOne more question, lets say a hardware occupies/acommendate 12v1 @ 18A, then how the 'balance capacity' works out on the rest of 12v2, 12v3, & 12v4? is it spread evenly?

This post has been edited by JoBigShow: Sep 5 2009, 06:09 AM
JoBigShow
post Sep 5 2009, 07:00 AM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(campsol2k @ Sep 5 2009, 06:22 AM)

CPU already accomodated *18A @12V1.. so total capacity left @+12V rail is 17A... and that 17A is for the rest of the hardwares @ 12V2, 12V3, 12V4..
* In reality... CPU doesnt eat that much power... my stock Q9550 eats around 55W~60W and when OCed w/ voltage increment @1.325V is approx 110W (ASUS EPU-6 Engine monitor report) .. and usually max possible usage for a CPU is 130W (11A) unless if the CPU is overclocked w/ voltage increment which add another +60W(5A) usage for example
*
Thanks bro, with what i learned, now i can accurately calculate how much my whole system consumes in terms of wattage, which hence i can figure out if my PSU is adequate for my current system and for other hardware upgrade to come in the future. thumbup.gif

Yes, i forgot the real world application of power usage is different theoretically, like u mentioned,
So, my cpu consumes average 45W (on my E7400 OC'ed at 1.3v@ 35A x 1.3 = 46.2W)
My GC 4870 idle @ 150W (needs 2 6pin connector(75w x 2), load about 290W
DDR2 Ram 1.8v = 63w.

Thats already 400W, excluding the calculation of CD drives, FDD, HDD, etc. Am I underpowered, or am i just exaggerating theoretically? because lot of other people i know have similar PC setup as mined but able to run their pc even with lower powered PSU than mine.

Rig:
E7400 3.8ghz@ 1.312v
HD 4870
Asus P5QL-Pro
DDR2 2G 800mhz HyperX
1 HDD
1 DVD-R


JoBigShow
post Sep 6 2009, 07:53 AM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(campsol2k @ Sep 5 2009, 02:20 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
OK, i'll try to do the estimates again, correct me again if i'm wrong:
1 HDD rated @ +12v/+5v (0.5A, 0.6A), hence ((0.5A x 12)+(0.6A x 12)) = 9W
4 case fans, approx. 1.2w~1.4w each = approx. 5.2w
1 CPU fan 120mm = approx 1.8w
1 4870; 75w x 2 = 150w average
2 DDR2; 3W x 2 = 6w
1 OC'ed e7400 3.8ghz @1.3v = LOAD approx. 50w average. (reference from Everest readings)
1 Asus P5QL-Pro; SB,NB, etc. via 4pin atx + 24-pin EATXPWR = Just guessing about 50w max.

= 272w of approximation wattage usage

Therefore:
(155w - 50w) + (420w - 222w) = approx. 303w of headroom @575w;
303w x 100% / 600w = approx. 50.5% total reserved wattage.
Yes bro, how's this estimation measured up in the practical real world scenario? biggrin.gif

And does the 80Plus efficiency by any chance can curb down the wattage usage? even a little?

JoBigShow
post Sep 7 2009, 06:16 AM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(campsol2k @ Sep 6 2009, 03:30 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Yes, my estimation seems to aim at the max. of what my whole system will/can consume at peak wattage...
Probably in the back of my mind all these times i have second thoughts if my PSU is capable enough of handling another 4870 to CrossFire. hmm.gif
(Yes, since my rig is 3 months new, its still 'under watchful scrutiny' if the PSU capacity is suitable and have the capability to handle another 4870.)

It seems that the real power consumptions are variables, i dont think i'll be getting any accurate readings at any fixed measure...
Thanks for correcting the misinformation i have; that a system doesnt always hover/stays too long in its peaks wattage.
Like u said, in the premise of 70% ~ 90% load. thumbup.gif

Relatively, adding insult to injuries I think I was made confused or mislead by PSU manufacturer's 'marketing gimmicks' when they advertised their PSU often @ peak wattage, but seldom their true power. It makes a hassle to those who's aware to the importance of power requirements and wants to build a rig with a complied PSU. Its just not about peak powers, but prominently are 'combined Amps' and the max. wattage at +12v rails, (which most power consuming hardware occupies/resides) which then follows with wattages @ +5v, then etc..

Efficiency-wise that u mentioned, that's a fair amount of energy saved if looked at a 1 years perspective of energy consumption in a household.
That 80Plus rating is for sure no gimmick i suppose.

Much gratitude man to your intervention and schooling in Mathematics i have now completed with another Chapter (Power Supply Unit 101),
which now adds into my 'resume' on 'Rig Building, OC'ing & PC Mods'. notworthy.gif




To Moderators: I'll be back to E7xxx OC'ing topics any time soon

JoBigShow
post Sep 7 2009, 01:05 PM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(campsol2k @ Sep 7 2009, 12:30 PM)
@JoBigShow
Power Requirement for 4870 CF
http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/gra...quirements.aspx

i checked the FSP manual. I believe your PSU's +12v rail is capable handling more than 35A (the 35A is the minumum and the max will be around 47A~48A). See at +5v,+3.3v, +12v combined wattage is 575W and minimum +5v & 3.3v(in the manual) is 5W and max 155W (on the PSU label) but your PSU label is quite confusing because it doesn't state the max maximum +12v rail like other PSUs ie Gigabyte PSU we discussed the +12v rail before and it has 30A max. For safety... 35A is the best assumption...
Your PSU absolutely can handle 4870 CF and still got few headroom for other hardwares ie HDD... so don't worry...  smile.gif
*
I'm relief that the PSU can handle 2 of them GC's. sweat.gif I thought i bought the wrong PSU bcoz i always hear people rave about that u need minimum 750w PSU for SLI and CF. (Ok maybe if they mean like SLI'ed GTX285 or Tri SLI'ed GTX260 than thats understandable...)

How did u calculate the max amps of +12v rail? The only info i get is from the manual book and is on the reference of Over Current Protection, which stated that:
OUTPUT VOLTAGE
+12v1,2,3, & 4 = 30A each max. current limit
+3.3v = 60A max. current limit
+5v = 48A max. current limit
Even in the manual it doesnt state about max Amps on +12v rails, so i deduce that its couple of Amps below the when the OCP kicks in.




JoBigShow
post Sep 8 2009, 08:13 AM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(campsol2k @ Sep 8 2009, 02:40 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Alright bro, I'll migrate to the threads you showed me, the moderators wont be to pleased for strayed topics.
Anyways I read reviews that the power consumption of 4870CF are around 270w~300w, for example:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

I think my PSU is sufficient to handle them to GC's. thumbup.gif I turst your judgments bro.
I will venture out into International forums for more info on the FPS Epsilon 600..
Thanqs for all the abundance of help you have given bro notworthy.gif





I'm back for E7xxx OC discussions . Will post my latest development of E7400 OC results soon...

JoBigShow
post Sep 8 2009, 08:13 AM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


QUOTE(campsol2k @ Sep 8 2009, 02:40 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Alright bro, I'll migrate to the threads you showed me, the moderators wont be to pleased for strayed topics.
Anyways I read reviews that the power consumption of 4870CF are around 270w~300w, for example:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

I think my PSU is sufficient to handle them to GC's. thumbup.gif I turst your judgments bro.
I will venture out into International forums for more info on the FPS Epsilon 600..
Thanqs for all the abundance of help you have given bro notworthy.gif





I'm back for E7xxx OC discussions . Will post my new E7400 results soon...


Added on September 8, 2009, 8:15 am
Sorry for Double post guys, my Internet connection is sluggish these days...

This post has been edited by JoBigShow: Sep 8 2009, 08:15 AM
JoBigShow
post Sep 9 2009, 08:42 AM

Ω Ξ Ψ Σ Д Ӫ Ж Π ✿
*****
Senior Member
969 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: ɹndɯnן ɐןɐnʞ


OC TRIAL #3

FSB 400 x 9.5 = 3.8ghz @ 1.296v (BIOS)
Run Time on Linx: 28m 34s

Main Components in Rig:
E7400 3.8Ghz @ 1.280v, with AC Freezer Xtreme
Asus P5QL-PRO
2G Kingston HyperX 800mhz
FSP Epsilon 80Plus 600W

Attached Image

Report
:
I have decrease the Vcore to the point of minimum voltages that the E7400 can handle @ 3.8Ghz:
1.280v. in CPU-Z; 1.296v in BIOS, which is about just one increment away compared with my previous 'OC TRIAL #2' @ 1.3v BIOS

The Vcore hovers around 1.28v to 1.292v in CPU-Z during the 20 rounds of LinX test runs.
I'm really stocked with the maximum temperature readings by only reaching @72c this time, rclxm9.gif
probably due to the lower voltage than my previously OC TRIALs, and not to forgot, the good work of the AC Freezer Xtreme.
On average the temps are approximately around 60c~65c on the LinX test runs.

I will humbly accept this OC setup because this is my main rig and I intend to run it 6hours+ average, per day.
Therefore I will stick to this setup, for now. nod.gif

-------

Talking about 4Ghz as benchmarking, I still could not ascertain any stability within those Ghz range. My hypothesis is that due to motherboard lacking the capability to OC 400 X 10. So in the next benchmarking test, I will try varieties of FSB X multiplier combinations to attain the 4Ghz mark, or at least the closest as possible.
I probably need a P45 chipset motherboard to OC seriously. But then again like I mentioned, I'm fine with 3.8ghz system for daily usage........



This post has been edited by JoBigShow: Sep 9 2009, 08:57 AM

5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0210sec    0.66    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 12:33 AM