Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
104 Pages « < 17 18 19 20 21 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD� Socket-AM2/AM2+ Overclocking thread (V8), Phenom Phenom Phenom

views
     
pikacu
post May 5 2008, 12:22 AM

male tag rosak
*******
Senior Member
7,740 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Some Yih


guys,i got something to ask about ram DDr2 vs overclock..

let say im using value ram 667mhz.

basically, during OC, we need to make sure that the ram speed will not go higher than 667mhz, since we are OC-ing processor, not ram, no?

so.....there is no need for extra voltage at ram right? since the ram clock speed is not higher than its original value..
Lacus
post May 5 2008, 12:30 AM

Lacus Sama No Tameni!
Group Icon
Staff
5,250 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
if BE not need. coz we increase the multiplier not the htt mah =D
mizivincible
post May 5 2008, 12:30 AM

"They'll be singing que sera sera"
******
Senior Member
1,633 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: Cheras, Selangor


QUOTE(pikacu @ May 5 2008, 12:22 AM)
guys,i got something to ask about ram DDr2 vs overclock..

let say im using value ram 667mhz.

basically, during OC, we need to make sure that the ram speed will not go higher than 667mhz,  since we are OC-ing processor, not ram, no?

so.....there is no need for extra voltage at ram right? since the ram clock speed is not higher than its original value..
*
U would want to lower the RAM speed since you dont want it to bottleneck the proc. Basically if you plan to see how far your proc can go, for 667 you just lower it to 400, the speed will be slightly higher from 667 after you oc to 3.0ghz.
pikacu
post May 5 2008, 12:45 AM

male tag rosak
*******
Senior Member
7,740 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Some Yih


QUOTE(Lacus @ May 5 2008, 12:30 AM)
if BE not need. coz we increase the multiplier not the htt mah =D
*
QUOTE(mizivincible @ May 5 2008, 12:30 AM)
U would want to lower the RAM speed since you dont want it to bottleneck the proc. Basically if you plan to see how far your proc can go, for 667 you just lower it to 400, the speed will be slightly higher from 667 after you oc to 3.0ghz.
*
umm...that not the point.

my point is...the voltage ram aka vdimm , there is no need to increase it, since it wont go beyond 667 mhz, right?
Najmods
post May 5 2008, 01:12 AM

*mutter mutter mutter mutter*
*******
Senior Member
5,211 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Konohana


QUOTE(pikacu @ May 5 2008, 12:45 AM)
umm...that not the point.

my point is...the voltage ram aka vdimm , there is no need to increase it, since it wont go beyond 667 mhz, right?
*
Of course not
mizivincible
post May 5 2008, 01:15 AM

"They'll be singing que sera sera"
******
Senior Member
1,633 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: Cheras, Selangor


QUOTE(pikacu @ May 5 2008, 12:45 AM)
umm...that not the point.

my point is...the voltage ram aka vdimm , there is no need to increase it, since it wont go beyond 667 mhz, right?
*
You wont need to increase the vdimm for it not passing 667 figure. But certain value ram I know, even doing 700 mhz it needed to increase the vdimm if not the system cant boot at all, even some passing slightly above 667 would need to increase the vdimm.

Your question was abit confusing since u were asking "since we are OC-ing processor, not ram, no?"

Increasing the speed of proc will increase the speed of ram as well. Its just the matter of what divider we are using.

This post has been edited by mizivincible: May 5 2008, 01:16 AM
TS-pWs-
post May 5 2008, 01:44 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
8,545 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: 224.0.0.6


QUOTE(ah_khoo @ May 4 2008, 10:57 PM)
gotta agree w/ u bro, Asus makes better boards for Intel.  smile.gif
usually ram clock higher in intel platform bro (from my experience), d mem controller (chipset) has higher latency iirc...  wink.gif
*
QUOTE(sempronic @ May 4 2008, 11:22 PM)
nahhh...for me AMD have good mem controller....coz now im running with my intel rig as wanna see how can it perform...proc easy to OC....but the RAM not as good as AMD... tongue.gif
*
Ram can be oc higher in Intel platform. wink.gif

QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ May 4 2008, 11:35 PM)
Becos the Intel Memory is not integrated together with the processor but Intel uses their "Chipset" as the memory controller,While AMD Memory Controller is already integrated on the proc itself.But if AMD is better,why our proc(AMD) cant get Sub 20 Secs(Super PI 1M)?Is it causes by the CACHE?
*
Architecture is the main reason. whistling.gif

-pWs-
alive88
post May 5 2008, 02:04 AM

Pata Pata Pon! Pon Pon Pata Pon!!
******
Senior Member
1,406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007


On-die mem controller is only on amd..intel use chipset..so the proc architecture wont be so messed up, as the mem controller is outside of the die..
this may be the reason why intel can put lots of cache and have better architecture..

@najmods..wif that budget of yours, maybe ull consider to save a bit and get a better cooler such as tuniq or xigmatek?
if cant, go wif cm 212..its better than AC64 IMHO...correct me if im wrong..
AMDAthlon
post May 5 2008, 02:25 AM

The future is Fusion
*******
Senior Member
5,221 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: Deneb star


Yeap thats correct.Deneb has 128Bit memory controller..= = =X128?/128Bit?

So guys regarding on ram thinggy,If i OC my Proc to 340HTT so my ram will become 340Mhz,it will go higher than 667/333.So how do i make it to boot?Must increase vDimm?
BuLaNaR
post May 5 2008, 03:36 AM

penyair sepi
*****
Senior Member
777 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: bandar baru bangi


QUOTE(BuLaNaR @ Apr 28 2008, 11:41 AM)
bro,pls update mine  tongue.gif

26.426 | BuLaNaR | 32800MHz 328x10 | Biostar TA690G | 2x1GB Crucial 10th Anniversary | 1093.2MHz @ 5-5-5-15-11-2T | Thermaltake MiniTyp 90

[attachmentid=455865]
*
bro,pls update mine notworthy.gif
krizalid88
post May 5 2008, 03:43 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
981 posts

Joined: Feb 2008



can i know what is da limit for x2 4400 when oc? i try on my proc & it only can hit 2.7ghz.. anybody pls help me..
Lacus
post May 5 2008, 03:46 AM

Lacus Sama No Tameni!
Group Icon
Staff
5,250 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
depending on ur hardware and etc. Can list out the specification of ur motherboard?
krizalid88
post May 5 2008, 04:43 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
981 posts

Joined: Feb 2008



my mobo is gigabyte ga-ma78-s2h


Added on May 5, 2008, 4:47 amowh... i got it finally...

This post has been edited by krizalid88: May 5 2008, 04:47 AM
mizivincible
post May 5 2008, 05:35 AM

"They'll be singing que sera sera"
******
Senior Member
1,633 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: Cheras, Selangor


QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ May 5 2008, 02:25 AM)
Yeap thats correct.Deneb has 128Bit memory controller..= = =X128?/128Bit?

So guys regarding on ram thinggy,If i OC my Proc to 340HTT so my ram will become 340Mhz,it will go higher than 667/333.So how do i make it to boot?Must increase vDimm?
*
Not necessarily. Depends on your ram too. Err, this one is based on 1:1 ke ? And I dont think 680mhz will need you to increase the vdimm. Even last time when using my value ram at 700mhz I didnt increase the vdimm but that depends on your hardwares too.
ah_khoo
post May 5 2008, 09:05 AM

- No Action Talk Only -
Group Icon
Elite
8,103 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.


QUOTE(-pWs- @ May 5 2008, 01:44 AM)
Ram can be oc higher in Intel platform. wink.gif
Architecture is the main reason.  whistling.gif

-pWs-
*
d guru has spoken... biggrin.gif

can't wait for 2ml, there'll be somethin new... tongue.gif
alive88
post May 5 2008, 09:33 AM

Pata Pata Pon! Pon Pon Pata Pon!!
******
Senior Member
1,406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007


let me guess..9850 BE??
AMDAthlon
post May 5 2008, 09:42 AM

The future is Fusion
*******
Senior Member
5,221 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: Deneb star


= = so alot switching to 9850.Drool edy?Cant wait for Deneb Silicon eh? whistling.gif
ah_khoo
post May 5 2008, 09:55 AM

- No Action Talk Only -
Group Icon
Elite
8,103 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.


QUOTE(alive88 @ May 5 2008, 09:33 AM)
let me guess..9850 BE??
*
wrong... how can a ta690g supports 9850be whistling.gif


hint:

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «



AMDAthlon
post May 5 2008, 10:00 AM

The future is Fusion
*******
Senior Member
5,221 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: Deneb star


Hmm..no doubt its X3 proc? sweat.gif
TA690G..wonder what proc u changing doh.gif

This post has been edited by AMDAthlon: May 5 2008, 10:01 AM
ah_khoo
post May 5 2008, 11:20 AM

- No Action Talk Only -
Group Icon
Elite
8,103 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.


QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ May 5 2008, 10:00 AM)
Hmm..no doubt its X3 proc? sweat.gif
TA690G..wonder what proc u changing doh.gif
*
still on f3, but gonna be gfx less since i got no pci-e card at d moment, gotta use my secret weapon ledi... d sis 8MB pci display card... laugh.gif

104 Pages « < 17 18 19 20 21 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0295sec    0.42    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 05:26 AM