1. In general, if your bank DOES NOT ALLOW
paying to reduce the loan principal then it would be much better to pay it by the month because you could not save any interest by paying upfront. Just keep the money you have in ASB or ASB2 account and generate dividends on them
My opinion is, if you are thinking to pay (more than the monthly installment) to reduce the loan principal, why bother applying for ASBF? Because the concept of ASBF is using OPM. The cash you use to reduce the principal will not be compounded, so I think it's better if you use that cash to take up higher loan amount OR just left it in the ASB and let it compounding. 2. For some banks like CIMB, there are 3 options, if you choose "reduce loan principal", you would save interests but you would still be responsible for paying the subsequent monthly installment. So you can't have a cake and eat it too.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
So my answer would be that it is better to just pay by the month and keep whatever money you have on hand in ASB/ASB2 as cash
1. On the first part, the so-called "hybrid method" is nothing more than
two separate ASB loan accounts, one paid using cash on a monthly basis, and the other paid using the rolling-method. In this thread we have had a long discussion about this a few pages back of which we were unanimous about categorizing this "hybrid method"
Here's the link to the discussionYes, basically the so-called "hybrid method" is just combination of rolling and compounding method; hence the name.2. I disagree that the "hybrid method" would allow you to get more profit over the long run. Since
the hybrid-method utilizes the rolling-method, it would generate less return than paying your installments normally in the next 30 years; and if you are adventurous, to refinance it every 5 years or so to maximize the capital.
The key for hybrid is, ONLY when you can't afford to take up full RM 200K ASBF in one shot. E.g. RM 100K ASBF compounding 5 years < RM100K hybrid for 5 years (adding new sijil on 2nd year). This method really leverage the OPM concept. Else, go for RM200K componding any day.3. As for surrendering the policy, the bank will sell your unit-certificate, and if there is a balance you would have to pay for it. This happens if you:
a. make a settlement too early into your loan tenure, for example about a year into it
b. you took a high-premium ASB-Reducing-Term-Assurance (ARTA), which would be capitalized into your total loan amount
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
For example, this client below
took a loan of 50k plus RM1.6k in ARTA. If the client chooses to make a settlement for the loan, the balance that she would to pay is
calculated as RM50,222.42 minus RM50,000 (her certificate value) which equals to RM222.42. Based on her ARTA surrender schedule, she is due for a surrender value of about RM900 or so, to be paid by Sun Life (the ARTA provider), but that would be deposited a few months later.
QUOTE
I believe you will only need to pay for the shortfall only if you opt for takaful/insurance and you terminate it too soon where the principal balance is more than the loan amount (as per in picture).
If you don't opt for takaful/insurance, even if you terminate after 1 month, you will not have to pay anything since the principal balance < loan amount. Correct me if I'm wrong.1.
At 4.85%, if you are looking at borrowing RM100,000, the monthly installment is only
RM528/m2. Provided that you took some minimal insurance for a premium of RM150, your total loan amount is just RM100,150
3. After 5 years (60 months), the total loan balance is RM91,769. Your certificate value does not change, it remains RM100,000 in those 5 years. RM100,000 - RM91,769 = RM8,231
4. You would be left with RM8,231 in your ASB account upon settlement with the bank.
5. At this point you are ready to reapply at full RM100,000, and the units in your account will be RM100,000 plus RM8,231, plus whatever dividends earned that you have left untouched in the past 5 years.
This is considered an "advanced-method", but don't let it scare you, all you need to do is to reapply when the time is right, to maximize the capital.
Try consider using "hybrid method"
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
I want to explain what is the hybrid method by using calculation. Why its better not to stay compounding when you still not max out your 200k asbf. Here I will give you 2 different calculation.
1st method compounding
100k compounding for 5 years.
Prinsipal sv - 8172
Compounding div. - 40,255
Total - 48,427
2nd method hybrid
apply 100k at 1st year than another 100k 2nd year (hybrid) for 5 years
1st 100k
Principal sv - 8172
Div. Balanced (7000 - 6441.84) x 4 years) - 2232
(div. Balanced = dividen - 1 year installment)
5th year div. - 7000
Total - 17,404
2nd 100k
Principal sv - 6370
Compounding div. (4 years) - 31080
Total - 37,450
Nett total for both certificate after termination - 54,854
Additional 6427 if using hybrid technique than compounding only from 100k. Just think how much the different gap if you terminate at 10,15,20 or 30 years.
Its just a simple comparison and hybrid will give more for you at the end. You just need to pay installment the same like you did with your 100k.
This method only suitable for those who cant afford to max out 200k asbf to maximize the potential return from the normal compounding technique.
You can start as low as 10k and max out till 200k however it will take many years to achieve it.
Dun stay compounding when you still not max out your 200k asbf.
Notes :
Loan rate 5%, tenure 30 years without insurance. Dividen prorate 7% (monthly - 536.82)
-haziq-