Just hit the ignore button bro. Let him be a ghost in all DC threads. Hahaha

simply amazing...

Read this and This

I won't bother replying anymore.

They say she is pregnant during the shooting, so she probably is having some difficulties

Just watched it. I give 8/10. I enjoyed this movie and don't care about the RT and all the haters. I know it has the flaws like bad CGI and etc...but..does it deserved to be hated that much..
Critics in RT is too much... at least give it 50-70%

Well, if so many hate it to the max, better cancel all the DC movies in the future. Let us watch only the Marvel Movies
i love both DC and Marvel by the way...

ROFL. Mark Hughes (Forbes) just revealed "rotten scumbag" attitude of Rotten Tomato

Mark never submitted his report on Justice League. Yet as he logged-in, it appeared his report has been sent & the score was "rotten"

Mark tagged RT & bombards them with questions as he claims to fans havin fun time watchin Justice League givin it a FRESH report

It also appears RT's current score for JL is 38% with their twitter account labelling the film as disappointment among "critics". ROFL. Who are those critics? Wanna meet them.

Every Tom & Dick with 1000+ Twitter & Facebook followers are calling themselves "critics" & RT's bias for MCU is further evidenced.

Now dont go label me as DC fan & stuff. I like both DC & MCU films equally.

Uhhh.....hmmmm.......heehhhh.....actually WB owned some stakes in RT through their investment in Fandango. Why on earth would they want to sabotage their own movie? Even RT wanted to help Marvel or WB, the FCC will take action as the anti-trust lawsuit no joke over there cause there are other big studios just won't let such thing slide. 😑
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotten_Tomatoes

Either their system glitching or someone about to get fired big time.

This post has been edited by 6so: Nov 18 2017, 11:56 AM

lol...1 review get mislabeled, big fking deal.

Also, the one who label their review fresh/rotten are the critics themselves, not RT.

I miss the ending cutscene....any1 have link for it?

JL projected to make less than 100m OW on a 300m budget, the flop is real
Hoping this won't happen cos I want to see a JL2

Then again, I want WB and Snyder to realize how badly they effed up this franchise

This post has been edited by gaeria84: Nov 18 2017, 01:03 PM

Watched it yesterday with a friend who is a comic book fan. Both of us think it is a subpar movie. Although I think BvS is bad but I still watch it 2 or 3 times for its visuals and 3rd act sequence and ww soundtrack. This one all seems pretty average and won't be back for repeat viewing. Those banter and interactions between the heroes is pretty ok, nothing to be shout about.

The only time I truly entertained in the movie is

Difference between Snyder & Whedon cut revealed

https://www.reddit.com/r/DCEUleaks/comments...al_cut_details/

After reading through, I realized now why WB decided to do reshoots. Snyder's version is a lot messier and would've gotten even worse reviews
Whedon's contributions were the ones that made the story a bit more cohesive and were the ones that got praised the most by critics

Though I felt that if they kept some of the deleted scenes in, it would've made for a much more engaging story

This post has been edited by gaeria84: Nov 18 2017, 04:56 PM

Watched it today, slowpoke. Mann im disappointed with this movie.

- First half was boring as hell
- F* the CGI team they did bad job with Cavill moustaches
- F* Danny Elfman, I hated the score its so unoriginal
- Storyline really messed up I can see plenty of involvement
- I feel like BvS was much tidier than this one

Really really disappointed with WB.. they had one job...

No wonder Ben Affleck wants to quit. F* WB.... 2/5 from me.

WB already becum like EA, cut out the extra scenes and put them into bluray/dvd

Bahahahah this is exactly what i need!!

Despite its problems, I still think the film is good. Dunno why people would nitpick it to death and call it the worst movie they've ever seen

This post has been edited by gaeria84: Nov 18 2017, 05:53 PM

hhhmmmm....that explain why some of 3/5 score has either fresh or rotten score....it depend on critic..

a few flawed arguments there. first of all, RT is actually partially owned by Warner Bros, the same studio which made Justice League. so there isn't any conspiracy to downgrade JL ratings intentionally from RT part. in fact, there are other critics claiming RT is intentionally doing a late reveal of JL score on the website so that WB can have more ticket sales.

RT is merely a review aggregate site. it does not hire the critics, or related the critics in anyway. but there are criticism regarding how RT produces the score. RT uses a computer algorithm to check for keywords in many reviews and then assign either a fresh or rotten rating to each review. therefore, it is either 100% good or 0% rotten for each review. it does not take into account of whether the review are actually mixed, such as half good half bad, or 60% bad but 40% good. this all or nothing approach can skew the final score unfairly towards very good or very bad, compared to the actual reviews in existences.

also, who know how accurate that computer algorithm really is when it tries to determine whether a review is actually "fresh" or "rotten".

http://www.indiewire.com/2017/11/ben-affle...aal-1201898213/

according to this article, it sounds like ben affleck wants the old batman to die and then replaced by another new batman. sort of like what happened at Nolan's Dark Knight Rises. it does not sound like he just want to quit abruptly and then replaced by a different person.