QUOTE(gaeria84 @ May 23 2017, 03:54 PM)
Not really, you can have several different cuts of the same film like 2-3 months before release (*cough* Suicide Squad *cough*)
Anyways, for countries that required the film to have dubbing, ideally the release date will be later than the rest of the world

Isn't the whole point of editing is to have multiple version so the studio can pick one version to finish up to release theatrically. It's already been a standard practice started from the Godfather days. I'm saying fundamentally Whedon does not have a lot of room to make changes to the edit as release date is too close for effects heavy film like this one. Simply no knowing whether minor or extensive reshoot. Furthermore it's disrespectful to a degree for Joss Whedon to do a 180 on Zack Snyder's rough cut unless the state of it really bad which simply again no way of knowing it. In order for the studio to greenlight the reshoot, think they already decided which rough cut version to base on. Pretty sure Zack Snyder already shares more than one of his extended edits to gauge feedback.
Does it even need Whedon edit vs Snyder edit to begin with? If it's good,it's good...so if it's sucked then it's sucked and not a single thing you can do about it.
The edit structure of BvS extended cuts....are just missing scenes without touching the heavy effects shots too much. It's not like Ridley Scott's Kingdom of Heaven which is night and day different.
So did Gareth Edwards cries when the last one third of Rogue One being reworked by Tony Gilroy. Neither did Gilroy came out dissing Edwards for not being credited for his contribution.
Unless you are living under a rock....blockbuster movies nowadays are being released simultaneously regionally mostly to call first dip on foreign ticket sales and to compete against streaming services.
This post has been edited by 6so: May 23 2017, 08:13 PM