QUOTE(charles_nkj @ Jun 24 2008, 05:44 PM)
well, i heard it from a fren of mine....
1. he said the cam is bad.... (maybe becoz of the small lense)
2. battery life.... (i suppose its due to brutal usage on touch screen)
3. limited 3rd part application.... (well uiq 3 is way behind s60 in this)
so, wat u guys think? would the be an improvement by SE?

Davidmak....
u seems to noe a lot about SE platform.... u work for them or sumthing?

Ah, the usual assumption that one knows too much will be associated with whatever company he speaks on.
The answer is no because you can get these information from esato forums, gsmarena, mobile-review, etc. If you want me to speak on Nokia's platform, I am just as competent. Hehehe!
By the way, UIQ is an UI interface (with touch capability) that sits on top of the Symbian kernel. It is an extension to the Symbian OS just like S60. Both are Symbian. Now there's a good chance for a software to work on S60 will work with UIQ. Not all will though. You can find a lot of UIQ applications if you search hard enough. GPS navigation applications for example are available on all mobile OS platforms. Of course, it is not as robust and scalable as S60 but it has a pretty good track record so far.
Also most games that you download from internet or telco are J2ME based and they can run cross-platforms. Its essentially JAVA. The only requirement is that the resolution must be correct/match your display resolution and in some cases, the soft keys must be correct.
Then again, your friend is right to a certain extend. I am not a great fan of UIQ, in fact I am a new user. G900 is my first UIQ phone and so far my experience has been pleasant.