Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
46 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Art & Design So you're interested in ARCHITECTURE? Version 2, A guide to becoming an Architect.

views
     
TSazarimy
post Mar 25 2008, 07:38 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE
Hi, i come from an average family and thanks to my parents, they had work hard to provide me with education. Engineering is my 1st choice if i were to compare it to architecture. The main reason is a Master in Architecture(RIBA/RAIA/ PAM part 2) is very expensive and the whole progress takes at least 5 years. Another thing is that it's 2 separate degree. Let's say i take Bachelor of Science(Hons) Architecture in Taylor's. What are the requirements for me to enter a university for a masters degree that is PAM part 2 equivalent? Is there possibility of not getting enrolled? NUS offers Master of Architecture(RIBA) and has a very low cost comparing to other RAIA/RIBA master degrees overseas. But since it's a public university, does it accept BSc from private institutes?


first things first.

not all part 2 qualification is offered via masters degree. in malaysia and most UK unis offer part 2 as a degree programme. it doesnt matter really in architecture, bcoz all the industry cares about is whether u hold a part 2 or not, not how far u've studied.

but it does concern the students, as the masters, a post-graduate degree, usually costs a few thousands more per year than an undergraduate degree. if money is an issue, u might be better off looking for a part 2 degree programme.

going into ur issues:

if u take degree in taylor's, the requirement for any part 2 universities is primarily a part 1 qualification. remember that taylor's degree is not accredited with part 1. so even if u graduate from there, u still do not hold sufficient qualifications to proceed to part 2.

so without a part 1, there's a possibility u wont get enrolled. however, most universities may consider u, if ur results are good with an exceptional portfolio, to join in at final year part 1 (3rd year 1st degree). finishing off the final year will award u with a proper part 1 qualifications, and later u will be able to continue with their part 2 programme. yes, it does take longer.

optionally, u could attempt to take ur part 1 exam independently. inquire with taylor's as how u can do that.

NUS do accept degrees from private universities, but similar to malaysian IPTAs, they would only consider u to a part 2 programme IF u've fulfilled the part 1 requirements.

QUOTE
Today i attended a career talk, and the guys in charged (from taylor or sunway cant recall) said that taking English Literature actually helps in landing a job on the architecture field. izit really that necessary?


that's rubbish.

what u need is exquisite language proficiency, be it in BM or english, although it is preferred that u could master both. in malaysian architecture, u tend to juggle between both languages when u deal with clients (english/BM), contractors (english/BM), other consultants (english), local authorities (BM) and so on.

u need to be good, but not to the point u need to take english literature. i dont think those incharge knew exactly what english literature is all about. tell me their names, i'll get them fired from their school tongue.gif.




TSazarimy
post Mar 27 2008, 05:07 AM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(aprisis @ Mar 25 2008, 02:38 PM)
i dunno their names since i listened only partially. but i was sure i heard, "if employers see 2 applications, 1 with EL and another 1 without, the 1 with EL will be put in a category and will be considered 1st. that moment i was like, omgwtfbbq?
*
even more rubbish. if i'm their boss, they'll be fired right then and there wink.gif.

QUOTE(Benjamin911 @ Mar 26 2008, 09:04 AM)
Based on some articles that I have read before, that is true actually.

The Arts definitely have a play in Architecture, be it Music (Different Genres), Humanity, English Literature, Religion, History, Culture, or even Psychology.

In addition to the above (Based on different Articles that I have read), it was also stated that Architecture also have its interest in the Sciences, Astronomy, Physics, Mathematics, Engineering, Innovations, Inventions and Technology.

In fact, a book that I read states;

Architects have a high degree of interest in designing and creating solutions to problems that involve both Engineering and Artistic principles. The Architect is interested in improving the buildings in which we live so that they are in keeping with the needs of today. Consequently, he is very observant of the problems around him - Social as well as Technical. He has an Appreciation for beauty and can see beauty in a well - Engineered Project.

The Architect must have the Engineer's ability to communicate graphically, orally, and in writing, but he will probably have greater Artistic Aptitude than the Engineer. His profession will require that he develop many drawings and pictorials that must be clearly understood, not only by people within the industrial field, but also by the client, who may have little understanding of detailed working drawings. Therefore, the Architect uses perspectives and Artistic methods to transmit his ideas so that they can be understood, approved, and finally realized in buildings.

The Architect must understand the Technical aspects of Engineering well enough to know how to obtain help when it is needed. A typical project requires him to be a coordinator of many Technical Fields. It is virtually impossible for him to be proficient in all the relevant fields, such as structures, air conditioning, heating, and landscaping; consequently, he must use consultants on large projects.

The Architect should have aptitude in Mathematics, Graphics, English, Social Topics, Physics, and Art. His need for Chemistry is less than that of the Engineer.

College training for the Architect is a five-year program with design emphasized throughout the entire period. He will take basic courses in Mathematics, Graphics, Materials, Physics, Engineering Mechanics, History, Structures, Environment Studies, City Planning, Mechanical & Electrical Equipment, and Landscaping. During each year of his college training, he will work on realistic design problems that will prepare him for entry into his profession.

Many Architects carry double majors whereby they obtain an Engineering Degree or a Business Administration Degree in addition to Architecture. The Master's Degree is being taken by more Architects now than in the past. However, the Master's Degree is less important for the Architect than for the Engineer.
*
what u should also understand is that architects may venture to give more emphasis on one aspect of architecture and lessen the others. a single school may even produce a multitude of architects with various different emphasis and skillset. an example of UTM, we have generally 7 specializations: urban, environmental, socio-cultural, architectonic/technology, history/conservation, vernacular/regionalism and theory/philosophy. so a student may specialize in environmental design and become an expert in anything about it, but at the same time absolutely crap in theory and philosophy.

relating back to whether english literature would contribute to higher chance of getting a job? i highly doubt so. mainly bcoz it doesnt relate directly to design and architecture. english literature might fit as a sub-topic in theory/philosophy, but for environment-prone practices currently popular in malaysia, i doubt firms would give priority of english literature over, say, an expertise in tropical climate designs.

QUOTE(tomatos @ Mar 26 2008, 09:40 AM)
Does the Part 1 exam has grades? If i passed it and have a bachelor degree, is my chances of going to NUS for MArch still tough?
*
no. LAM exams only have a pass and fail. i cant really say much about ur chances in NUS other than u're competing with hundreds of other singaporeans, not to mention other international students.

QUOTE(Benjamin911 @ Mar 26 2008, 10:22 AM)
Do not worry. Relax, things are looking very good for Diploma in Architecture students who are studying in Taylors School of Architecture & Building Design. smile.gif

Firstly, we will all be having the choice of the following universities after our Diploma in Architectural Technology; Universities that will be accepting us with a minimum cumulative average (achiever) of 60% only!!! rclxm9.gif That is too good to be true, and we (Diploma in Architecture) will also be going straight to the "Final" (3rd) year of their Part 1 Degree program.

You know, in the Malaysian Government Universities, you will only be allowed to enter into the 2nd year of their Part 1 Degree Program at the very best of your luck (I do not think that they would even accept you with a 60% cumulative average; you will need to be much better than that).


the 60% average is a "deal" that taylor's have made with those universities. it should never be translated as the diploma programme holds a higher quality than others. this is what partnership/twinning programmes all about.

QUOTE
In addition, the Malaysian Government Universities can also just reject you, seeing that you are from a private university.


no we dont. we reject students with low achievements, regardless whether they're from private or public. never assume about such things.

QUOTE
On the other hand, those oversea universities listed out below will be ever willing to accept you at a 60% cumulative average and give you a place in the final year of their Part 1 Degree; smile.gif (These Universities also have their own Part 2 Architecture Degrees as listed in the parenthesizes.) 

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Secondly, we, Taylor's Diploma in Architectural Technology today, will be having the chance to study in the new Taylor's Flagship State of the Art Lakeside University Campus upon its completion next year. smile.gif

Thirdly, we will be having the option to remain back in Taylors by taking their Bachelor (Hons) of Science (Architecture), and then proceed to any of the universities listed up above straightaway into their Part 2 Degree! thumbup.gif

*
part 2 equivalent, not accredited with part 2 yet wink.gif.

QUOTE(iphonegizmo @ Mar 26 2008, 10:52 AM)
just received offer for Taylor Bachelor 3yr Arch Degree this March intake but still pending if i should accept it and pay rm 58 k 
(plus oversea 2yrs to get B.Arch + spend over 200k)

[Note: Not yet accr. by PAM nor  LAM /JPA  (so cant get  PTPTN loan yet as no RUJ no.) .. just subject approved lo doh.gif ]

OR

go to study in 'King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi' School of Architecture in thailand straight down 5YRs B.Arch. for rm60k only
(need SAT 1 pass/ TOEFL  or A-Level pass  plus Portfolio ..i can make it  rolleyes.gif )

Which path to choose.. i have very tight budget. . self supporting for next 5 yrs . sweat.gif
any comments recommendations..


i'm not quite sure about king mongkut's university of technology, so i cant really give good replies to assist ur judgement.


QUOTE(iphonegizmo @ Mar 26 2008, 03:10 PM)
LAM
Part I and II  Examination.. anyone know what kind of exam (interview, academic writing, or  ..?
*
it usually includes a review of past works and an interview. if those two are unsatisfactory, u will be required to sit for an assignment (report writing or that sort of thing). u can find more info about the exam in LAM's website.

QUOTE(aprisis @ Mar 26 2008, 05:05 PM)
is there actually much difference between ADP and the one offered in Taylor (not sure which)? from what my counselor told me ADP is only 4 years while the latter 1 is 6 years. She also said the syllabus are identical but a 2 years gap?
*
ADP? american degree programme?
TSazarimy
post Mar 27 2008, 06:05 AM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(aprisis @ Mar 26 2008, 09:54 PM)
Yeah american degree program smile.gif
*
i still dont get u. u're comparing which ADP with which course?

if u're talking in general, american architecture courses are very different and not widely accepted in malaysia. a close colleague of mine, a Phd already with an associate professor title, had to take the LAM part 1 and 2 exams bcoz his archtiecture degree from university of miami (one of the prestigious architecture schools in the UK) is not recognized in malaysia.

my point is, they are VERY different.


TSazarimy
post Mar 27 2008, 04:58 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(aprisis @ Mar 27 2008, 08:25 AM)
sorry sorry  tongue.gif

i had to wait for a friend of mine to confirm.

its ADP and Melbourne Degree Programme. do u know anything about them?
*
still, u havent told us which ADP u're referring to. in the US, each state has its own code of practice for architecture. if malaysia has LAM, UK has RIBA and australia has RAIA, each state in the US has its own governing body for the practice. so u gotta be very specific which school are u gonna end up with in the US before we can start to compare anything.

and after u've decided that, do tell us what sorta difference r u looking for wink.gif. and dont ask about quality, bcoz there's no way to compare them.
TSazarimy
post Mar 27 2008, 07:06 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(aprisis @ Mar 27 2008, 10:03 AM)
not very detail, but i juz wanna know y the difference in years doh.gif
*
without knowing where u gonna end up in, it's very hard to tell u what's the difference and why. i suggest u try to wiki more info on american architecture programmes to get an idea of how different they are. u can start by understanding that US universities do not require a pre-u programme.
TSazarimy
post Mar 28 2008, 03:30 AM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(Benjamin911 @ Mar 27 2008, 06:09 PM)
Based on what I was told, the minimum qualification of the lecturers in the School of Architecture & Building Design is a Masters Degree, and that all of them are having good English proficiency. (Based from my observations so far, the lecturers were capable of giving good lectures, and they were also fluent in English.)

The "Standard" is clearly there, at Taylors. (BTW, if their Architecture course is being moderated by the University of Melbourne, then it would definitely need to be having the standard.)

Recently, there was a famous Architect who came to share his works with all of us, his works was great to say the least. (I really cannot describe how fantastic the works are, you will need to see it to know how awesome it is.)
*
which as compared to IPTAs, where the minimum qualification for a lecturer is a PhD.

by the way, taylor's use melbourne's curriculum, hence why it is being moderated by melbourne. a good school would be able to moderate themselves rather than having another school tell them which should pass, and which shouldnt. what it basically says is that "taylor's, u may use our curriculum and teach however u want, but we have the final say of what happens to the student".

u shouldnt confuse between moderation and external examination. external examination determines the standard between schools, where independent experts gather in ur school and assess the school's standards.
TSazarimy
post Mar 28 2008, 09:58 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(Benjamin911 @ Mar 28 2008, 08:08 AM)
That was my point. wink.gif

I am glad to know that Taylor's Architecture program is moderated by the University of Melbourne. (Considering that the University of Melbourne is a top Architecture school.) smile.gif

When I was enrolling into the Architecture program at Taylors, the admission officer had to inquire with the University of Melbourne on whether I could be accepted into the Architecture program or not. (The Melbourne U had to screen through my high school accomplishments and results.)

If Taylor's program is moderated by the University of Melbourne, then Taylors need to live up to the standard.  icon_idea.gif

[I cannot imagine Taylor's students graduating from a below par program, and then getting twinned to the University of Melbourne at a 60% cumulative average...] Taylors have to be good for the University of Melbourne to be able to accept their students at a 60% cumulative average.

It is not just the University of Melbourne that will be the only one accepting Taylor's students at a 60% cumulative average, but the following list of Universities will too >>>


it is very possible for someone to graduate below par from taylor's. they just dont get to further their studies in melbourne.


QUOTE
Regarding the lecturers, a Masters Degree should already be adequate for the Diploma program, and for the Part 1 Degree progrm as well.

Why waste more $$$$ to employ PHD holders to lecture subjects that could be taught just as well by Masters Degree holders??? (Do you need to pay an Automotive Engineer to become your car mechanic, when a car mechanic, for less $$$$, could do the job for you just as well at this level???)


that's what most people think. in actual fact, a masters degree doesnt carry much weight in conducting academic programmes, as they are not the expert in the fields they're teaching. they are not qualified to review or change the syllabus, hence depraved from being a full academic. why waste more money to employ phd holders? bcoz they own the knowledge they're teaching. it's copyrighted to their name. u will learn first hand knowledge from the person who discovers it.

i wouldnt argue that there are good lecturers holding only a masters. i'll let to go through tertiery education first. u will realize ur perception will change, that masters is not much different from a degree, but a long-long way from a PhD. more over, holding a masters doesnt guarantee they can teach. remember, lecturers are NOT trained to teach. if u expect lecturers to teach, u're already way off in ur expectations wink.gif.

TSazarimy
post Mar 28 2008, 10:39 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(aprisis @ Mar 28 2008, 02:13 PM)
@azarimy

let's say i do take up architecture, from ur view, which kind of course should i take?

sry if i'm bugging..coz i'm a form5 without much knowledge about these but dun wanna wait till spm is over to get knowing doh.gif
*
what kind of course to take?

err... architecture laa. what else? biggrin.gif
TSazarimy
post Mar 28 2008, 11:46 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(aprisis @ Mar 28 2008, 03:09 PM)
oops..i thought there's different kind of them?
*
not so much. there's no differentiation in architecture courses, unlike engineering, where u have mechanical, electrical, electronic etc.

all architectural programmes will train u the same basics, more or less, with some emphasis according to the school's philosophy. emphasis doesnt carry much difference. u still learn the same thing, u just spend more time learning things that they emphasis about.
TSazarimy
post Mar 29 2008, 01:04 AM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(aprisis @ Mar 28 2008, 04:37 PM)
erm..ok..

how do i become a full fledged architect? is gaining work experience a must? or once i graduate i'm officially one?
*
depends on what u mean by "full-fledged". if u're talking about becoming a chartered architect with part 3, then yes, u need at least 2 years work experience or accumulate enough experience in the logbooks. graduation only makes u an architect (part 2).

this have been discussed in page 1. do refer.
TSazarimy
post Mar 29 2008, 07:17 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(aNNd33 @ Mar 28 2008, 07:13 PM)
Erm....i'm kinda new here..... mind to let me know whether UIA AED foundation that is offer in UPU has an interview 1st b4 entering it?

and can u explain me more details bout the portfolio? 1 more thing.....

my spm result was 2a1=english,modmath 2a2=agama islam,addmath 3b3=b.melayu,sejarah,physics 2b4=biology,sport sc.

so am i qualified enuff for UIA AED foundation?  icon_question.gif
*
u need to check with UIA's foundation requirement. i'm only familiar with intakes AFTER pre-university levels.

refer to the FAQs (in page 1) for details on the portfolio.

QUOTE(*TeDucK* @ Mar 29 2008, 12:56 AM)
hello! smile.gif
ill make this clear n short

i applied UCAS n got this conditional offers for undergraduate studies (architecture):

-->>UNI OF PLYMOUTH<<--
-->>UNI OF PORTSMOUTH<--

duration: 3 years
tuition fees: 8,750 pounds
course start: 22sept 08
i am really,badly in need of financial support! sweat.gif u know how expensive studying in uk will be...
but that will not stop me cz im very determine to study there!

i got 6A in spm (yeah..i wish i could get better..huuu) n will finish my foundation in architecture at Center Of Foundation Studies of IIUM (CFS IIUM) in june..but i already finish all my core course.
my personal estimation is to get 3.4-3.5 cgpa.
really hope u guys reading this could help me. rolleyes.gif
ive been browsing for days searching scholarships (if i cant get one, i should probably need to get a loan instead whistling.gif ) but there's prob like:

-only for LOCAL UNI
-ARCHITECTURE course is EXCLUDED
-not QUALIFIED (like for sime darby n Yayasan Khazanah Global Scholarship)
-wont sponsor for students GOING TO UK (yes..mara n jpa)
doh.gif doh.gif
*
i'm not sure how i could help here. i'm not very familiar with fundings.

QUOTE(aprisis @ Mar 29 2008, 10:18 AM)
ok, so after i graduate, i'm a part 2 architect, another 2 years of work experience i'm into part 3 already?


Added on March 29, 2008, 6:21 pmfrom the chart there isnt part 3. so i assume everyone automatically upgrades to part 3 after 2 years?
*
the chart stops at part 2 bcoz that's where ur formal education in architecture stops. this section is called the education essentials, hence i just summarized it in one paragraph. there's only one way to get part 3, that is via part 2, practice for about 2 years and fill the logbook, and sit for the part 3 exam. it's not automatic, and the exam could be too hard for some, which is why we only have about 1600 part 3 architects in malaysia right now, despite producing roughly 500 part 2 architects per year.


TSazarimy
post Mar 29 2008, 08:05 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(Benjamin911 @ Mar 29 2008, 11:30 AM)

WTH??? Even Curtin University of Technology is accredited by LAM - PAM??? (That is LIMKOKWING's partnership university lol! laugh.gif)

This is a surprise to me! (Azarimy, are you sure that the University of Melbourne is also accredited by LAM - PAM??? biggrin.gif) Why haven't I known this before??!! rclxms.gif


where did i say melb or curtin is accredited by LAM/PAM? no they are not.

QUOTE
To continue from where I left just now;

When you finish your Part 2 Degree, you are finally known as the real Architect; the one who can practice Architecture! (The MASTER BUILDER!) cool2.gif


i would refrain from using the term "master builder". master builder is a term reserved from super architects who not only have built prestigious designs, but more importantly, have significantly contributed to the architectural world and influenced other architects. holding a part 3 with the title AR infront of ur name does not allow u to call urself a master builder. especially dont simply use the term infront of other architects/lecturers, coz u'll become the laughing stock of the community biggrin.gif.

QUOTE
You will have the option to register with the Board of Architects Malaysia to become a Chartered (Professional) Part 3 Architect. After registering as a Part 3 Architect, you will have to work for a minimum of two (2) years and fulfill the requirements, and then finally sit for the Part 3 exam in order to qualify as a Part 3 (Chartered/Professional) Architect.
*
haih... no.

first, after graduating with a part 2, u will register urself with LAM as a part 2 architect. this will start ur journey to fill in the log book by practicing for 2 years and fulfill the requirements. at the end of the day, the committee will review ur logbook. and if they're satisfied, u will be able to sit for the exam. once passed, u will register urself as a part 3 architect.

u dont register as part 3 to take the part 3 exam. the term registration assumes u've already achieved all the requirements.

QUOTE(destroyer @ Mar 29 2008, 11:31 AM)
hello. i would like to ask something.
i would like to apply diploma seni bina for politeknik. So, i would like to ask students or lecturer in architecture. I would lyke to ask you have you meet any student from politeknik diploma? how do they perform? because i heard thet politeknik student don't perform well in their degree. how bout politeknik students for architecture?

Edited: any other experienced stuedent or lecturer can give their opinion?
*
i've had a lot of experience with poly students, both from diploma and certificate. if anything u can say about them, not performing well is not one of them. remember that architecture is more of a hands on learning, where u will spend more time doing than reading. this is something the poly students are damn good at: DOING. with rigorous trainings in poly, they have a firm technical foundations with drawing skills that most straight to degree students could ever dream of.

ofcourse, those i've experienced are top poly students who got selected into UTM. it means i have not met anybody from the lower end of the food chain. regardless, the poly students that i've met have extremely good drawing skills. when most mainstream students would spend time trying to draw their ideas for the entire night, the polys just stream through their ideas at 10 A3s per hour. when they're good, they're THAT good.

i think the 'bad perception' about poly students starts off from the low SPM intake. people always say if u cant qualify for a degree or diploma, go poly. this ends up with people saying polys are only a place for those who didnt score SPM. in actual fact, it's not. poly is a higher level of vocational training. it's totally different from mainstream academic. architecture itself is totally different from mainstream academic, hence why poly students fare pretty well in it.

i cant say the same for other courses though.
TSazarimy
post Mar 29 2008, 09:41 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(Benjamin911 @ Mar 29 2008, 12:33 PM)
Then what is this from Architecture Malaysia (am) >>>
And >>>
From Wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architecture

icon_idea.gif


Added on March 29, 2008, 8:37 pm

OK, thanks a lot for clarifying this part.
*
u see, u're reading, but u're not understanding the context of the word. the word architect is derived from the meaning master builder. architects call themselves architects. in the architecture community, master builder is a high ranking architect, not just any. it's someone who is respected in the industry who have contributed alot of things. some master builders in malaysia would be ken yeang or hijjaz kasturi. but u dont call someone who just graduated and designed a bungalow a master builder. get what i mean?

if an architect is a master builder, then how does interior architect, landscape architect or computer systems architect come into context? do they really "build", or more towards designing? do they actually build anything? this is what we call context. one word could mean a lot of things, we call it semantics. u'll see alot of this later on.

QUOTE(destroyer @ Mar 29 2008, 12:56 PM)
btw, is it easy to enter degree in UTM if i'm using my polytechnic diploma? is there any discrimination towards poly students in U?

how much polytechnic diploma pointer do i need to enter UTM architectural degree? do i still need to attend interview for degree?

btw, do architectural diploma in polytechnic require me to go through interview?
*
easy? like i said, u need top grades. UTM treats all diploma as the same, intakes will go straight into 2nd year. poly dip will compete with other dip holders from UTM dip school, IPTS and other institutions that awards architectural diplomas.

u will need at least 3.50 to stand a chance, preferrably with 1 or 2 years experience, and u will still need to attend the interview.
TSazarimy
post Mar 29 2008, 10:06 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(destroyer @ Mar 29 2008, 02:01 PM)
so that's mean after i get my diploma, i have to get a working experience for entering UTM degree?
does this apply only to poli student or to all diploma holder who is trying to apply for architecture degree? sorry for asking a lot of question?
*
after diploma, it is always recommended that u get some working experience first. it's not a requirement, but UTM only offers 8-12 places for diploma students per year, and we have applications averaging between 50-80 per year. so competitions are fierce. u need all the bonus stuff u can get to boost ur chances.

it applies to all diploma, including UTM's own diploma students.
TSazarimy
post Mar 29 2008, 10:19 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(destroyer @ Mar 29 2008, 02:11 PM)
owh. i see. tanx azarimy.

normally, diploma grads will go for draughtman position or architect assistant?
*
either one or both. most firms in malaysia dont really differentiate between them. with experience a diploma holder can become an architect assistant. one of architect assistant's job description is draughtmanship biggrin.gif. so either way, u'll do both.
TSazarimy
post Mar 29 2008, 11:20 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(destroyer @ Mar 29 2008, 02:28 PM)
btw azarimy, do we need to attend interview for architect diploma in politeknik?

yeah. btw, i really thank you very much for helping me. you help me a lot.

i've came across an article somewhere in newspaper that architecture grads all manage to get job. it is the same level as doctor. 100% grads manage to get job.
*
i dont know. check with polytechnic' intake requirements.


in other news:

QUOTE
UTM Architecture Student Top Winner of Just Jerusalem Global Competition

Skudai, 23rd March: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia's (UTM) architecture student has been declared top prize winner in the Just Jerusalem Competition, an international competition organized by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

The result was announced at MIT on March 21st and released simultaneously on the competition official website. Just Jerusalem was an open global competition attempted at seeking ideas and proposals that addressed different aspects of urban life in a futurist Jerusalem. The news was announced by the Vice Chancellor, Tan Sri Datuk Ir. Dr. Mohd Zulkifli bin Tan Sri Mohd Ghazali, in his officially address during the 40th Convocation held at UTM Skudai campus today.

Initially a total of 1,150 people from 85 countries registered for the competition. Eventually only 125 eligible proposals were accepted by the organizer which later undergone review by world-class panel of jury convened at MIT. Among the nine-member jury were Suha Ozkan and Herman Hertzberger, both a well-known scholars and architects.

Chan Wai Lai, a senior architecture student decided to take up the competition as her final year Design Thesis project at beginning of the academic session. She hoped and aspired to see Jerusalem as city of peace through the idea of sharing. In her project abstract, she elaborated,

"Without raising awareness of the need for sharing, energies devoted to constructing iconic architecture or designing beautiful buildings do not make sense. To achieve new and true peace, we must solve the problems of man, not of buildings, facilities or land division -- because all these problems come from man alone."

As an expression of hope for future Jerusalem she adopted "Children's Village for Jerusalem" as the title for her competition entry. It is in the children that she hoped the future community of peace would be nurtured and raised out of a built environment that she have designed, and hopefully in the end the proposed dwelling environment would help to address social equality and harmony among citizenry of Jerusalem.

As top winner she will be given the opportunity to spend up to an academic semester in residence at MIT as Jerusalem Visionary Fellow, with all expenses paid, including travel, housing, and stipend. It is estimated that a total amount USD50,000 been allocated for her appointment as visionary fellow.


read more
TSazarimy
post Mar 29 2008, 11:59 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(destroyer @ Mar 29 2008, 03:40 PM)
all right, i'll give them a call this Monday.

Btw, from ur experience, do u remember mostly, the polytechnic student studying in UTM for degree come from which poly?

just asking. tanx in advance
*
cant remember. it doesnt really matter bcoz all use the same syllabus and have more or less the same facilities. perhaps the only difference is lecturers/teaching staff.
TSazarimy
post Mar 30 2008, 12:41 AM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(destroyer @ Mar 29 2008, 04:25 PM)
yeah, rite now am searching or the right poly to study. i'm worry a bit about the lecturer. heh. but i don't expect myself to just live by spoon fed till i grad.

btw azarimy, you're continuing ur study in UK under sponsorship or self-sponsor?
*
u know, it would be easier to put ALL ur questions in one post. this isnt a chat room, u know.

i am under sponsorship, ofcourse. i'm not from a wealthy family tongue.gif. o
TSazarimy
post Mar 30 2008, 05:48 AM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(destroyer @ Mar 29 2008, 04:49 PM)
hah. i believe that u r not from wealthy famly, but i don't believe that urself r not wealthy. hak3.

who sponsor you to study in UK? mind sharing how you get there?
*
JPA-UTM. when i was offered a place as an academician in UTM, it comes with a scholarship to further my studies in masters and PhD anywhere i want. so for my masters i chose the most expensive and prestigious school - the bartlett in UCL, and for my PhD at the leading school of architecture education - university of sheffield. the contract comes with a 7 year contract that begins after i finish my PhD.

QUOTE(Erozx` @ Mar 29 2008, 08:51 PM)
Hi , im new to this thread and i find it very helpful indeed.If it wasn't for azarimy i would have known nothing bout architecture.Thank you arazimy !Well , there's something i would like to enquire about.If i were to study in a non-accredited school and have taken the LAM exam independently, does  it mean my degree would then be accredited by LAM ?
*
ur degree wont, but u will.

doing an accredited degree kills two birds in one throw - u accumulate knowledge and skill + getting the license. doing an unaccredited degree only awards u with the knowledge and skills, but u'd have to get the license independently.
TSazarimy
post Mar 30 2008, 08:38 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(aprisis @ Mar 30 2008, 11:46 AM)
if for example a building collapses or something similar, will the architect in charge of it be found responsible? from what i heard even if there's flaw in the design the architects will be exempted.
*
in such events, it is hard to point the responsibilities to the architect, bcoz it usually boils down to two parties: the engineers and the contractors/builders.

in constructing the building, the engineers' job is to verify that the building is buildable and safe in engineering sense. meaning the structure is safe, all the the parts are actually buildable and able to take all the loads and so on. when this process is complete, they will issue endorsed drawings with their signature on it. the signature means everything has been verified and the engineer takes full responsibility of it.

the contractors' job, on the other hand, is to build EXACTLY to the architect's and engineers' specification (using the drawings). they may not, in whatsoever way differ from the drawings.

so as u can see, when the building collapses, people will first look at the engineers drawings. they'll check whether everything is truely safe. if it werent, then they'll hang the engineer. if the drawings are sound, they'll look into the contractors. if the contractors didnt follow the drawings, then it's the contractor's fault.

in such events, it's hard to blame the architect, bcoz certain responsibilities were delegated to the experts. unless the architect did the engineering calculations or constructing the building themselves, it'll be very hard to take down the architect. however, this does not mean the architect is 100% responsibility free. they will still be responsible for SELECTING the faulty engineer or contractors in the first place. so they still have a hand on it.



building collapsing is usually the least of the architect's worries. there are lots of other things where the architect can be directly at fault. for example, failure to design according to the fire-safety standards; or if tenants complain about rooms being too hot to live in; or social problems created by their designs (usually at low cost, high density houses like flats). these sort a thing is something the architect will be directly responsible for.

46 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0213sec    0.63    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 08:05 AM