Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Why choose Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8?, and not Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5?

views
     
nairud
post Nov 25 2008, 09:25 AM

One Leg Kick Ultra
Group Icon
Staff
7,529 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Nov 25 2008, 09:18 AM)
If you have the budget might as well go for Nikkor 17-55mm f2.8 or the 24-70mm f2.8 biggrin.gif
*
which is why i'm looking for one since i helped my friend cover his wedding and the outcome is not so favourable with T17-50. SWM ftw thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by nairud: Nov 25 2008, 09:25 AM
vikingw2k
post Nov 25 2008, 09:30 AM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(nairud @ Nov 25 2008, 09:25 AM)
which is why i'm looking for one since i helped my friend cover his wedding and the outcome is not so favourable with T17-50. SWM ftw thumbup.gif
*
Means you are hunting for 17-55mm or the 24-70? brows.gif

Get 24-70 la. You still can utilize it if you switch over to D700
SUSabang
post Nov 27 2008, 10:39 AM

Abang Familia
*******
Senior Member
2,078 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuching, Sarawak.


how much a 17-70 sigma street price? interested... f4.5 but sharp its ok for me..
travis_ckf
post Dec 24 2008, 03:32 AM

ambitious but rubbish......
*******
Senior Member
6,413 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong Not For Human Live One....


I now hunting for a F2.8 lens for next year KLIMS. Hence should i go for a Tammy 17-50 or Sigma 24-70, since both almost priced the same?

I would want some sharpness to surpass my bread and butter lens Sigma 18-200 as well as some decent bokeh. I did tried Tammy and the bokeh n colors are just nice. Not sure about 24-70.


KTCY
post Dec 24 2008, 03:47 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(travis_ckf @ Dec 24 2008, 03:32 AM)
I now hunting for a F2.8 lens for next year KLIMS. Hence should i go for a Tammy 17-50 or Sigma 24-70, since both almost priced the same?

I would want some sharpness to surpass my bread and butter lens Sigma 18-200 as well as some decent bokeh. I did tried Tammy and the bokeh n colors are just nice. Not sure about 24-70.
*
What's your budget ? If budget allow, why not Nikkor 17-55 f/2.8 ? smile.gif
travis_ckf
post Dec 24 2008, 03:56 AM

ambitious but rubbish......
*******
Senior Member
6,413 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong Not For Human Live One....


QUOTE(KTCY @ Dec 24 2008, 03:47 AM)
What's your budget ? If budget allow, why not Nikkor 17-55 f/2.8 ? smile.gif
*
Definery not above 2k leh sweat.gif

One thing to point that tamron 17-50 f2.8 may be the most popular F2.8 lens but it is also slow in focusing and QC issues emerged as my fren had a problemtic one.

I would need some reviews for the sigma 24-70 as well. I quit fond with sigma since i using its 18-200 now.
Sp00kY
post Dec 24 2008, 01:53 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
Im looking at 17-70 as well...!!
Radeon
post Dec 24 2008, 01:57 PM

Semi-Retired Overclocker
*******
Senior Member
2,257 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

imba thread
should be compared with sigma 18-50 f2.8 only equal mah
art806
post Dec 24 2008, 09:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
Was looking for tammy 17-50 but now the price has gone up about
RM300... What's the sigma price?
mybiebie
post Dec 24 2008, 10:22 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,419 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
looks like tamron the clear winner here....maybe my next buy if have extra cash....ha..ha...
camedemac
post Dec 25 2008, 12:19 AM

Newbie
*****
Senior Member
954 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Ampang Kg. Pandan Status: Idle



different level. should compare with sigma 18-50
and i still prefer tamron 17-50 f2.8 bcoz its cheaper and f2.8 at any focal length

yet still prefer nikkor/canon but the price?


Sp00kY
post Dec 26 2008, 07:30 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
anyone knows the price of 17-70?
mohdsh
post Dec 26 2008, 08:27 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
56 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Any comment on the SIGMA LENS 70-200mm 70-200 , F2.8, EX DG HSM MACRO for my D300 and pairing with my Nikkor 17-55 F2.8??

How much selling in KL??
albnok
post Dec 26 2008, 03:58 PM

Alpha Male
Group Icon
Elite
4,956 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL


The Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4.5 can focus closer than any other lens and get 1:2.3x maximum magnification.

Do you remember how you had digicams with super macro modes? This feels like it. You can go REALLY close to something at the 17mm end! You can really touch the flowers with your lens! You can put your lens against a computer screen!

Of course, if you want F2.8 at 50mm then the Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 is cheaper. I cannot comment on the sharpness compared to the 17-50mm but the 17-70mm is sharp.

The Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 comes with a Tamron micro-motor in the Canon and Nikon versions (so it sounds like a Transformer buzzing inside.) The Sony and Pentax versions are screw-driven and they are a lot quieter, but not as quiet as a Canon USM or Nikkor SWM.

4 Pages « < 2 3 4Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.1416sec    0.48    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 11:48 AM