QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Nov 25 2008, 09:18 AM)
which is why i'm looking for one since i helped my friend cover his wedding and the outcome is not so favourable with T17-50. SWM ftw This post has been edited by nairud: Nov 25 2008, 09:25 AM
Why choose Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8?, and not Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5?
|
|
Nov 25 2008, 09:25 AM
|
|
Staff
7,529 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Nov 25 2008, 09:18 AM) which is why i'm looking for one since i helped my friend cover his wedding and the outcome is not so favourable with T17-50. SWM ftw This post has been edited by nairud: Nov 25 2008, 09:25 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2008, 09:30 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
|
|
|
Nov 27 2008, 10:39 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,078 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuching, Sarawak. |
how much a 17-70 sigma street price? interested... f4.5 but sharp its ok for me..
|
|
|
Dec 24 2008, 03:32 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,413 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong Not For Human Live One.... |
I now hunting for a F2.8 lens for next year KLIMS. Hence should i go for a Tammy 17-50 or Sigma 24-70, since both almost priced the same?
I would want some sharpness to surpass my bread and butter lens Sigma 18-200 as well as some decent bokeh. I did tried Tammy and the bokeh n colors are just nice. Not sure about 24-70. |
|
|
Dec 24 2008, 03:47 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(travis_ckf @ Dec 24 2008, 03:32 AM) I now hunting for a F2.8 lens for next year KLIMS. Hence should i go for a Tammy 17-50 or Sigma 24-70, since both almost priced the same? What's your budget ? If budget allow, why not Nikkor 17-55 f/2.8 ? I would want some sharpness to surpass my bread and butter lens Sigma 18-200 as well as some decent bokeh. I did tried Tammy and the bokeh n colors are just nice. Not sure about 24-70. |
|
|
Dec 24 2008, 03:56 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,413 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong Not For Human Live One.... |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Dec 24 2008, 03:47 AM) Definery not above 2k leh One thing to point that tamron 17-50 f2.8 may be the most popular F2.8 lens but it is also slow in focusing and QC issues emerged as my fren had a problemtic one. I would need some reviews for the sigma 24-70 as well. I quit fond with sigma since i using its 18-200 now. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 24 2008, 01:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
Im looking at 17-70 as well...!!
|
|
|
Dec 24 2008, 01:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,257 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
imba thread
should be compared with sigma 18-50 f2.8 only equal mah |
|
|
Dec 24 2008, 09:25 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
115 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
Was looking for tammy 17-50 but now the price has gone up about
RM300... What's the sigma price? |
|
|
Dec 24 2008, 10:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,419 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
looks like tamron the clear winner here....maybe my next buy if have extra cash....ha..ha...
|
|
|
Dec 25 2008, 12:19 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Ampang Kg. Pandan Status: Idle |
different level. should compare with sigma 18-50
and i still prefer tamron 17-50 f2.8 bcoz its cheaper and f2.8 at any focal length yet still prefer nikkor/canon but the price? |
|
|
Dec 26 2008, 07:30 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
anyone knows the price of 17-70?
|
|
|
Dec 26 2008, 08:27 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
56 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
Any comment on the SIGMA LENS 70-200mm 70-200 , F2.8, EX DG HSM MACRO for my D300 and pairing with my Nikkor 17-55 F2.8??
How much selling in KL?? |
|
|
Dec 26 2008, 03:58 PM
|
|
Elite
4,956 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
The Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4.5 can focus closer than any other lens and get 1:2.3x maximum magnification.
Do you remember how you had digicams with super macro modes? This feels like it. You can go REALLY close to something at the 17mm end! You can really touch the flowers with your lens! You can put your lens against a computer screen! Of course, if you want F2.8 at 50mm then the Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 is cheaper. I cannot comment on the sharpness compared to the 17-50mm but the 17-70mm is sharp. The Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 comes with a Tamron micro-motor in the Canon and Nikon versions (so it sounds like a Transformer buzzing inside.) The Sony and Pentax versions are screw-driven and they are a lot quieter, but not as quiet as a Canon USM or Nikkor SWM. |
| Change to: | 0.1416sec
0.48
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 11:48 AM |