Why choose Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8?, and not Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5?
|
|
 Dec 24 2008, 03:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
6,413 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong Not For Human Live One....  
|
I now hunting for a F2.8 lens for next year KLIMS. Hence should i go for a Tammy 17-50 or Sigma 24-70, since both almost priced the same?
I would want some sharpness to surpass my bread and butter lens Sigma 18-200 as well as some decent bokeh. I did tried Tammy and the bokeh n colors are just nice. Not sure about 24-70. |
|
|
Dec 24 2008, 03:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
6,413 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong Not For Human Live One....
|
QUOTE(KTCY @ Dec 24 2008, 03:47 AM) What's your budget ? If budget allow, why not Nikkor 17-55 f/2.8 ? Definery not above 2k leh    One thing to point that tamron 17-50 f2.8 may be the most popular F2.8 lens but it is also slow in focusing and QC issues emerged as my fren had a problemtic one. I would need some reviews for the sigma 24-70 as well. I quit fond with sigma since i using its 18-200 now. |
| Change to: |  0.0449sec
 0.47
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 08:37 AM |
Quote