Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Why choose Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8?, and not Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5?

views
     
vikingw2k
post Nov 24 2008, 11:23 AM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(Maniac @ Nov 23 2008, 09:25 PM)
below are my summary after playing with them for quite some while ago.

Sickma focus real fast but does not guarantee pristine image quality, tammy in the other hand, offers quality instead of focusing performances.

Nikon offers both at the cost of 3 times more expensive.  Canon offers an over priced lens at this FL range.
*
You forgot something. Canon offers both and on top of that the only 17-55 which comes with IS smile.gif

This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Nov 24 2008, 11:24 AM
vikingw2k
post Nov 25 2008, 09:18 AM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(Andy0625 @ Nov 24 2008, 10:42 PM)
I really wonder why Tokina never popular in Malaysia.
Their built quality are top-notch and yet it's wider than T1750mm aswell.

If I have the budget for sure I'll go for Tokina as the built is compareable to Nikkor ones.
*
If you have the budget might as well go for Nikkor 17-55mm f2.8 or the 24-70mm f2.8 biggrin.gif


vikingw2k
post Nov 25 2008, 09:30 AM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(nairud @ Nov 25 2008, 09:25 AM)
which is why i'm looking for one since i helped my friend cover his wedding and the outcome is not so favourable with T17-50. SWM ftw thumbup.gif
*
Means you are hunting for 17-55mm or the 24-70? brows.gif

Get 24-70 la. You still can utilize it if you switch over to D700

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0436sec    0.62    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 08:33 PM