Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

19 Pages « < 14 15 16 17 18 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Movies The Incredible Hulk, Hulk Smash ! In Cinema Everywhere

views
     
SUSyukikaze
post Jun 21 2008, 09:13 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
315 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Ipoh,Perak


QUOTE(mrsmile @ Jun 21 2008, 08:46 PM)
can someone guide me to explain all tis marvel thing, there's like so many 'heroes' and so many 'teams'. so, how r they gonna explain about things in justice league, pening wacko.gif  rclxub.gif

and did stan lee alone drew all those heroes comics?
*
justice league is DC's universe
the avenger or the ultimates or whatsoever they call it which include spidahman,ironman,hulk and such are from Marvel's universe
mrsmile
post Jun 21 2008, 09:24 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
606 posts

Joined: May 2008
oh now i understand but it seems the less understood i am rclxub.gif wacko.gif
kobe8byrant
post Jun 21 2008, 09:52 PM

I'm too old for this stuff
********
All Stars
12,275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: KL


One question, does anyone (esp Burga) know where I can get Norton's script because this one was horrible and paper thin. Norton however did himself no favors with a piss poor bland performance. I still stand by what I said that I'd watch this over Lee's Hulk though tongue.gif
screech
post Jun 21 2008, 10:39 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
398 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(mrsmile @ Jun 21 2008, 08:46 PM)
and did stan lee alone drew all those heroes comics?
Nope, Stan Lee never drew anything. He only did the plotting/scripting. The art chores were handled by a number of different artists, most famous among them Jack Kirby.

Together they created Ironman, Captain America, Thor, Hulk, Avengers, Fantastic Four, X-Men and other lesser known works.

This post has been edited by screech: Jun 21 2008, 10:52 PM
Azhar85
post Jun 21 2008, 11:13 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Bayan Lepas, P.Pinang


Stan Lee are not alone when he created the characters of Marvel Universe. There a lot more who give the idea of the characters. But the famous of them all are Stan Lee..
QuickFire
post Jun 21 2008, 11:39 PM

The more you sin the more you win
*******
Senior Member
2,867 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(kobe8byrant @ Jun 21 2008, 09:52 PM)
One question, does anyone (esp Burga) know where I can get Norton's script because this one was horrible and paper thin. Norton however did himself no favors with a piss poor bland performance. I still stand by what I said that I'd watch this over Lee's Hulk though tongue.gif
*
norton almost always carries an air of blandness around him anyway.... tongue.gif I mean he's okay, but he never excels past being just good except in one or two movies.

Watch Lee's Hulk again with a different mindset la. Dont expect a standard hollywood action blockbuster and you should at least find it pretty good.
kobe8byrant
post Jun 21 2008, 11:50 PM

I'm too old for this stuff
********
All Stars
12,275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: KL


QUOTE(QuickFire @ Jun 21 2008, 11:39 PM)
norton almost always carries an air of blandness around him anyway.... tongue.gif I mean he's okay, but he never excels past being just good except in one or two movies.

Watch Lee's Hulk again with a different mindset la. Dont expect a standard hollywood action blockbuster and you should at least find it pretty good.
*
Point 1: Edward Norton in my opinion is an excellent actor. Very demanding but nonetheless, excellent. I've always admired his willingness to stay away from big budget blockbusters and stay with smaller projects. Primal Fear, American History X and Fight Club have provided enough for me to think of him as being a fine actor. Hulk just sucked. Be it because of a lack of material to work on or him being pissed at his ideas not getting accepted, no one knows.

Lee's Hulk sucked. Okay, the comic book editing was great - I'd give you that and after seeing this Hulk, I'd say that Bana, Connelly, Nolte (Nolte >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roth shakehead.gif ) and the old Ross (can't remember his name, Elliott?) were way better than this movie but for feck sake, you are directing a summer blockbuster, what the hell were you trying? Try directing a Bond movie and make it look like Get Smart. Let's see if that genius will get slated by the critics. I gave it another go on TV3 last week I think and I still thought it sucked.

I am Jack's enraged fingers.
BurgaFlippinMan
post Jun 21 2008, 11:58 PM

Wachaaa!
*******
Senior Member
6,486 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
I agree with.....Quickfire
kobe8byrant
post Jun 22 2008, 12:06 AM

I'm too old for this stuff
********
All Stars
12,275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: KL


QUOTE(BurgaFlippinMan @ Jun 21 2008, 11:58 PM)
I agree with.....Quickfire
*
Not surprising considering how we don't agree on anything. tongue.gif
BurgaFlippinMan
post Jun 22 2008, 12:28 AM

Wachaaa!
*******
Senior Member
6,486 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Well its obvious who has the better taste then...wink.gif ROFL. jk.

Anyway you can buy the Incredible Hulk's (and many others) screenplays here
kobe8byrant
post Jun 22 2008, 12:31 AM

I'm too old for this stuff
********
All Stars
12,275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: KL


QUOTE(BurgaFlippinMan @ Jun 22 2008, 12:28 AM)
Well its obvious who has the better taste then...wink.gif ROFL. jk.

Anyway you can buy the Incredible Hulk's (and many others) screenplays here
*
How the heck you got Darabont's script then?!
BurgaFlippinMan
post Jun 22 2008, 12:39 AM

Wachaaa!
*******
Senior Member
6,486 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Darabont's Indy script is not for sale. Its presumably locked up somewhere in Lucasfilm archives along with Jeb Stuart's, Jeff Nathanson's and Jeffrey Boam's. But, as fate would have it, Darabont's leaked and then spread like wildfire on the internet. I mean, this is the one script that everyone wanted to see after its rejection by Lucas despite enthusiasm from Spielberg. Now it hasn't been confirmed by Paramount, Lucasfilm or Darabont that its legit, but Moriarty of AICN and some other industry insiders have stated that it is legit. It reads like a real script (if it were a hoax, the writer would have to be a screenwriter himself) and someone has definitely been playing whack-a-mole with the sites that hosted the script. So all indications are that it is indeed legit. smile.gif

This post has been edited by BurgaFlippinMan: Jun 22 2008, 12:42 AM
tech_frix
post Jun 22 2008, 09:11 AM

Boo Yah!
*******
Senior Member
5,656 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: wheres d oil price is higher than condoms..

i like dis movie...
sooo childish... tongue.gif tongue.gif
QuickFire
post Jun 22 2008, 10:27 AM

The more you sin the more you win
*******
Senior Member
2,867 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(kobe8byrant @ Jun 21 2008, 11:50 PM)
Point 1: Edward Norton in my opinion is an excellent actor. Very demanding but nonetheless, excellent. I've always admired his willingness to stay away from big budget blockbusters and stay with smaller projects. Primal Fear, American History X and Fight Club have provided enough for me to think of him as being a fine actor. Hulk just sucked. Be it because of a lack of material to work on or him being pissed at his ideas not getting accepted, no one knows.

Lee's Hulk sucked. Okay, the comic book editing was great - I'd give you that and after seeing this Hulk, I'd say that Bana, Connelly, Nolte (Nolte >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roth  shakehead.gif ) and the old Ross (can't remember his name, Elliott?) were way better than this movie but for feck sake, you are directing a summer blockbuster, what the hell were you trying? Try directing a Bond movie and make it look like Get Smart. Let's see if that genius will get slated by the critics. I gave it another go on TV3 last week I think and I still thought it sucked.

I am Jack's enraged fingers.
*
I'm not gonna argue about norton. Try as he may he just cant shed that slight bit of blandness around him. Even in his best roles he has suspect acting moments, like at the end of AHX where he cries. That almost ruined the scene for me.

I'm not talking about the movie getting mauled by the critics here. I'm saying people should go watch it again in a different light, and not AS A SUMMER BLOCKBUSTER. Sometimes I wonder why people love Batman Begins and slate this. It's not a fun movie. There is hardly any fun in it. Perhaps its because batman has always been one of the darker and more serious of superheroes, while Hulk is the brainless all-fun-and-no-depth counterpart... so fans cant appreciate it when a director comes along and tries (and pretty successfully) gives it depth?
Cheesenium
post Jun 22 2008, 11:07 AM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(kobe8byrant @ Jun 21 2008, 11:50 PM)
Point 1: Edward Norton in my opinion is an excellent actor. Very demanding but nonetheless, excellent. I've always admired his willingness to stay away from big budget blockbusters and stay with smaller projects. Primal Fear, American History X and Fight Club have provided enough for me to think of him as being a fine actor. Hulk just sucked. Be it because of a lack of material to work on or him being pissed at his ideas not getting accepted, no one knows.
*
Yeah,i watched AHX and Fight Club few months ago.Edward Norton's acting was really great in both movies but in Hulk,i just find that he wasnt really given a chance to show his talent.

I guess the reason that he doesnt want to Hulk 2 is because of that.Hulk is too brainless and emotion less for him. tongue.gif
kobe8byrant
post Jun 22 2008, 11:42 AM

I'm too old for this stuff
********
All Stars
12,275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: KL


QUOTE(QuickFire @ Jun 22 2008, 10:27 AM)
I'm saying people should go watch it again in a different light, and not AS A SUMMER BLOCKBUSTER. Sometimes I wonder why people love Batman Begins and slate this. It's not a fun movie. There is hardly any fun in it. Perhaps its because batman has always been one of the darker and more serious of superheroes, while Hulk is the brainless all-fun-and-no-depth counterpart... so fans cant appreciate it when a director comes along and tries (and pretty successfully) gives it depth?
*
No matter which light you see it in, the Hulk should have been trimmed down by half an hour (the first half hour) and I think Iron Man has proved that you can have a good origin story (depth and fun) without boring the heck out of the audience. What made Batman Begins, Iron Man and even this (by .5 star) a better movie was the pacing of the film. I think Begins and Hulk was about the same length but by God, I thought I was watching Lawrence of Arabia when I was switching on to the Hulk.

This post has been edited by kobe8byrant: Jun 22 2008, 11:58 AM
QuickFire
post Jun 22 2008, 12:02 PM

The more you sin the more you win
*******
Senior Member
2,867 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Iron Man's depth doesn't even skin the surface of Hulk. Look at Hulk as a good, complex drama with a comic book element. Iron Man for all it accomplishes is still very much a standard fun blockbuster ala Spiderman. It's still is very well done though, I'm not gonna take that away. Needed more action and it could have been great.

I think it wouldnt be fair to Hulk if we were to compare it to movies like Spiderman, X=Men, and Iron Man. Its just different from the usual popcorn fare. It made the mistake of coming out in the wrong season, being hyped for the wrong reasons, and being targeted at the wrong audience.
kobe8byrant
post Jun 22 2008, 12:25 PM

I'm too old for this stuff
********
All Stars
12,275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: KL


QUOTE(QuickFire @ Jun 22 2008, 12:02 PM)
Iron Man's depth doesn't even skin the surface of Hulk. Look at Hulk as a good, complex drama with a comic book element. Iron Man for all it accomplishes is still very much a standard fun blockbuster ala Spiderman. It's still is very well done though, I'm not gonna take that away. Needed more action and it could have been great.

I think it wouldnt be fair to Hulk if we were to compare it to movies like Spiderman, X=Men, and Iron Man. Its just different from the usual popcorn fare. It made the mistake of coming out in the wrong season, being hyped for the wrong reasons, and being targeted at the wrong audience.
*
Yes, but I wasn't talking about depth alone. I said that I thought that Iron Man had the right balance of both depth and fun.

By your logic, shouldn't we forgive Joel Schumacher's Batman bastardization for being a tongue in cheek mindless comedy with a comic book element? Doesn't take away that the film was rubbish. Admittedly, Lee's Hulk doesn't hit that level by any means, but it still sucked. In a nutshell, I wouldn't watch both Hulk movies again even if I was paid to do so.
peinsama
post Jun 22 2008, 12:26 PM

Au fait
*****
Senior Member
725 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(kobe8byrant @ Jun 21 2008, 09:52 PM)
One question, does anyone (esp Burga) know where I can get Norton's script because this one was horrible and paper thin. Norton however did himself no favors with a piss poor bland performance. I still stand by what I said that I'd watch this over Lee's Hulk though tongue.gif
*
I would say Edward Norton acting in this movie is better than the one he starred in The Illusionists and Kingdom of Heaven.

You know the first thing in my mind when Lee drank the 'green juice', i was like 'OMG, what will he become?'
kobe8byrant
post Jun 22 2008, 12:29 PM

I'm too old for this stuff
********
All Stars
12,275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: KL


QUOTE(peinsama @ Jun 22 2008, 12:26 PM)
I would say Edward Norton acting in this movie is better than the one he starred in The Illusionists and Kingdom of Heaven.

You know the first thing in my mind when Lee drank the 'green juice', i was like 'OMG, what will he become?'
*
I was okay with Illusionist and Orlando Bloom ruined KoH for me to even care two hoots about it. Liam Neeson FTW!!! rclxms.gif

19 Pages « < 14 15 16 17 18 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0251sec    0.31    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 12:47 AM