Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Restrict accounts from same IP, No multiple accounts

views
     
TSb00n
post Jan 8 2008, 11:35 AM, updated 18y ago

delusional
Group Icon
VIP
9,137 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Wouldn't be around much, pls PM other mods.
Not really good at IT.

Is it possible that when registering a new nick, a check is done on the source IP to see whether it's a match to current nick with the same IP?

If it's a match, than a pop up message to inform that there's only one nick per account and have found a match in IP add. Explanation for the purpose of 2 nicks within the same IP will have to send to the admins.

Also flag out an exception list on the particular nick so in the event the guy try registering from another IP, it's still a match.

Just a suggestion because sometimes seeing ppl creating multiple accounts just to spam or to the extent of another con in sales section. Thus by the time that someone found out and report, it could be too late.
Example: http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/606183
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/604343

This post has been edited by b00n: Jan 8 2008, 11:40 AM
RBR
post Jan 8 2008, 11:45 AM

keeping calm..
Group Icon
VIP
3,107 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sydney



There are plenty of people who legitimately share IP with another user:- housemates, cybercafe, university dorms etc. Asking for an explanation will inevitably result in 'housemate' being the dominant reason. We have other ways to determine whether or not 2 nicknames belong to the 1 user which is far more effective.
goldfries
post Jan 8 2008, 12:01 PM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




That's why forum participants' cooperation in helping nab these people who create multiple account is critical. smile.gif
stevanistelrooy
post Jan 8 2008, 12:03 PM

Ten seconds you won't believe what's gonna happen.
Group Icon
VIP
2,450 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
b00n, not really possible when the IP is dynamic.

One other option was to have a registered email, such as xxx@streamyx.com or uni/college email address or referral by already approved members which we can trace.

Also, buyers are partly at fault. If you look at the first link that you've given, if he counter-check/search the number, it would point to another thread in trade dispute section before he bank-in. Question was, did he did own research before purchasing?If we can enforce something like you said, but buyer still did not do his/her research, no point of having such implementation. The thread was started more than 12 days(which was when the deal took place*refer link1).

If you refer link2, his methods is restricted to using a middleman account since his account+wife account is "blacklisted in LYN already".
If buyer use their instinct, why should I banking into another person account when I trade with you? It would be suspicious at the very first point. Problem with buyers was they are not using their sense. If he insist that the account belongs to another person, ask for more stuff to make sure that he have the item, such as taking a picture of the item and written a paper with name side by side.Insist COD and do not made advanced payment until then. Best case, don't deal. Get it from other places which can provide you much more security, such as from retails shop.
TSb00n
post Jan 8 2008, 02:06 PM

delusional
Group Icon
VIP
9,137 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Wouldn't be around much, pls PM other mods.
OK.....since it's not feasible than case close.
Thanks for the education.
wKkaY
post Jan 8 2008, 02:19 PM

misutā supākoru
Group Icon
VIP
6,008 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Just to clarify - it's not being shot down because it's unfeasible, but because it's really ineffective.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0136sec    0.43    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 06:57 AM