isn't this the famous case at the highway there? with the steering bat ? a big hooha in /k since racing topic

Yes this is called provokation

Nope, that isn't provocation. That's after the fact. Unless, the person ambil the video, get's offended and belasah the guy, then he can say he was provoked. It did not happen.



This is called provocation.  there is a threat of injury and harm that is coming directly at you.

Q: Why did the arrogant killer refused to move his car to release the dying victim, and left him to die of his injuries?

Q: Why did the arrogant killer refused to move his car to release the dying victim, and left him to die of his injuries?

Both filled with rage cannot think ady. Type m want to whack the guy duncare if he in car. Type c see his challenge dunwan back down so floor the accelerator. Only after when his mind clear he realize he went too far so argue self defense.

nice ! next time want to kill anyone, make sure to have a good behaviour and make it look like accident

With average lifespan at only 75, a 12 years jail term is as good as deducting 16% of his lifespan. Still not enough?

would like to know how the judge judged... how to read the mind of a person...

prosecution say anger, defecene say dissoriented, how do they know wat is YEW thinkking at that moment,

On Aug 22, 2019, Yew was charged with the murder of Syed Muhammad Danial, 29, at Kilometre 293.6 of the PLUS Highway (Kuala Lumpur-Seremban) between 1 pm and 2 pm on Aug 10, 2019.

In the cross-appeal, Deputy Public Prosecutor Ng Siew Wee argued that the High Court judge erred in sentencing Yew for culpable homicide instead of a more severe charge.

The accused stated that the incident happened quickly, but the prosecution argues that despite the short duration, it does not prevent the court from inferring an intent to cause harm and death under Section 300 of the Penal Code, she said.
        She argued that in his defence testimony, the accused stated that he saw the deceased (Syed Muhammad Danial) rushing toward his car while holding a baseball bat, prompting him to shift gear from reverse to drive before hitting the victim.

The accused said that he felt his life was in danger and wanted to protect himself and his pregnant wife who was in the vehicle at the time, she said.

However, she said, according to the video recording of the 19th prosecution witness, who is the accused’s wife, at the scene, he was not acting in self-defence or to protect his property (car); instead, he was angry and intended to teach the deceased a lesson, adding that the 16-year prison sentence was appropriate and not excessive.

Meanwhile, lawyer Datuk N.Sivananthan, who represented Yew, argued that the incident happened quickly and that his client did not intend to commit the act.

He was blank (disoriented) at the moment and the act of moving the car was purely in self-defence to avoid being hit by the deceased with a baseball bat, said the lawyer, who also requested the court to impose a seven to eight years prison sentence.

-- BERNAMA

see how the defense lawyer pusing lor. It's not a coincidence a lot matcha become lawyer. kekekkeke

Nope, that isn't provocation. That's after the fact. Unless, the person ambil the video, get's offended and belasah the guy, then he can say he was provoked. It did not happen.



This is called provocation.  there is a threat of injury and harm that is coming directly at you.

On Aug 22, 2019, Yew was charged with the murder of Syed Muhammad Danial, 29, at Kilometre 293.6 of the PLUS Highway (Kuala Lumpur-Seremban) between 1 pm and 2 pm on Aug 10, 2019.

In the cross-appeal, Deputy Public Prosecutor Ng Siew Wee argued that the High Court judge erred in sentencing Yew for culpable homicide instead of a more severe charge.

The accused stated that the incident happened quickly, but the prosecution argues that despite the short duration, it does not prevent the court from inferring an intent to cause harm and death under Section 300 of the Penal Code, she said.
        She argued that in his defence testimony, the accused stated that he saw the deceased (Syed Muhammad Danial) rushing toward his car while holding a baseball bat, prompting him to shift gear from reverse to drive before hitting the victim.

The accused said that he felt his life was in danger and wanted to protect himself and his pregnant wife who was in the vehicle at the time, she said.

However, she said, according to the video recording of the 19th prosecution witness, who is the accused’s wife, at the scene, he was not acting in self-defence or to protect his property (car); instead, he was angry and intended to teach the deceased a lesson, adding that the 16-year prison sentence was appropriate and not excessive.

Meanwhile, lawyer Datuk N.Sivananthan, who represented Yew, argued that the incident happened quickly and that his client did not intend to commit the act.

He was blank (disoriented) at the moment and the act of moving the car was purely in self-defence to avoid being hit by the deceased with a baseball bat, said the lawyer, who also requested the court to impose a seven to eight years prison sentence.

-- BERNAMA

U know the case where a home owner went after a robber after he left & murdered him? He was charged & sentenced with intent to murder.

The driver acted rashly beyond a necessary level to stop a threat. And he had a chance to let go the already severely injured victim, but rather let him die.

Your arguments cannot fly in the face of the courts - what the driver did is no more an act of self defence, but pure malice.

here we go again, post a fitnah picture.

This one someone purposely cropped this picture from a video to fitnah him one, then u also post as well.

U know the case where a home owner went after a robber after he left & murdered him? He was charged & sentenced with intent to murder.

The driver acted rashly beyond a necessary level to stop a threat. And he had a chance to let go the already severely injured victim, but rather let him die.

Your arguments cannot fly in the face of the courts - what the driver did is no more an act of self defence, but pure malice.

Baseball bat in the car all the time, u tau la orang tu ape perangai.

I would have just bang him with the car, pinning him on the divider and refuse to release is pure evil.