QUOTE(Porkycorgi5588 @ Jun 8 2025, 12:41 AM)
my heart not your DC Malaysia lands, Embarrassment.
Malaysia lands, Embarrassment.
|
|
Jun 8 2025, 09:28 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,072 posts Joined: Jun 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2025, 02:00 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
173 posts Joined: Jun 2012 |
QUOTE(pobox @ Jun 6 2025, 02:43 PM) Funny. well ive been saying its big hoo ha but lacking since the very first article of alibaba kl data center and get destroyed by /k supporters many years back.Did nothing and was condemned as Do Nothing. Did something and was said "big hoo haa but lacking...." the few dozen jobs inside also probably will give to the children and grandchildren of the property developer by word of mouth the servers also priced the same like usa oregon etc. give fking discount as malaysian citizen la. |
|
|
Jun 8 2025, 03:22 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
252 posts Joined: Aug 2024 |
|
|
|
Jun 8 2025, 03:25 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#44
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,481 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
what can rempit do at data center?
sell nasi lemak motor viral at the main gate? |
|
|
Jun 8 2025, 03:58 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#45
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,144 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
Not sure why the hatred toward datacenters.
They are like any other foreign investment in this country. |
|
|
Jun 8 2025, 05:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,072 posts Joined: Jun 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2025, 05:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,072 posts Joined: Jun 2018 |
QUOTE(Najibaik @ Jun 8 2025, 04:55 PM) you didnt ask. QUOTE(caviars @ Jun 8 2025, 05:28 PM) Not sure why the hatred toward datacenters. I dont have hatred or issue with DC, but the truth about Malaysia Lands is shamble to be noted. Especially the rigged palm oil scam. They are like any other foreign investment in this country. This post has been edited by Syie9^_^: Jun 8 2025, 05:15 PM |
|
|
Jun 8 2025, 07:31 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#48
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,583 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Clerking. Data Entry like a Mad Man |
QUOTE(Hardcore Leveling Warrior @ Jun 6 2025, 02:57 PM) all these DC wants is someone who can work 24hours. For this singular job, the security guard with clearance access to that button will do lor. 24/7 got guard on site macan go inside DC within 30minutes of ticket. just to push the reset or power button. |
|
|
Jun 8 2025, 07:34 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#49
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
206 posts Joined: Aug 2021 |
Myawadi or KK incoming.
|
|
|
Jun 9 2025, 12:05 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#50
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,603 posts Joined: Sep 2021 |
QUOTE(hjh87 @ Jun 6 2025, 05:31 PM) Guys, it's not just 33kV. As far as I know, these large DC projects currently require 275kV. Inside the TNB portal for consultation, it already shows that TNB has established a dedicated team to handle this type of project. No one dare to reply your post but I appreciate your reply. One 275 kV PMU can theoretically power about 2.5 to 3 cities the size of Petaling Jaya at peak demand. The, 275kV demand is very huge !Normally, for 275kV—or even 132kV, which I've seen before—the fastest completion time is around 2 to 3 years. Keep in mind, this involves pylon erection and land acquisition, which can be a huge mess, especially when private land is involved. The building and internal infrastructure are quite straightforward; it's the external infrastructure that's going to be the real challenge. For a 275 kV to be completed within 2 to 3 years is already a miracle. The land acquisition is not an easy matter when it involves private land — in case the private owner contests the compensation of the land acquisition. The public thinks it is a wet market transaction. What’s saddening is the ang moh highlighting the problem (without exploring the cause of the problem), but the readers just believe it without any intention to understand the depth of the issues faced in the distribution. ~ Practical Example (Malaysia) PMU Serdang East (275 kV AIS): Took approximately 30 months from ground-breaking to energization. PMU Olak Lempit Upgrade (275/500 kV): Estimated project duration was 36 months due to complexity and transformer upgrades ~ The public who criticize these delays are like people asking why a baby can’t be born faster by getting nine women pregnant at the same time. If the ang moh wants to compare Malaysia with other countries — Thailand, the Philippines, or Australia — and if those countries truly can build a 275 kV substation faster, then yes, TNB should reflect on why others can deliver the "baby" sooner. But until we see that happening consistently elsewhere, the public needs to educate themselves. You can’t rush something that naturally takes time. Just like making a baby — it takes nine months, no matter how impatient you are. In this case - 275kV PMU need minimum time around 30-36 months ( if the existing site do not have any 275KV PMU) Syie9^_^ liked this post
|
|
|
Jun 9 2025, 05:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
794 posts Joined: Feb 2010 |
QUOTE(nihility @ Jun 9 2025, 12:05 PM) No one dare to reply your post but I appreciate your reply. One 275 kV PMU can theoretically power about 2.5 to 3 cities the size of Petaling Jaya at peak demand. The, 275kV demand is very huge ! Thanks for providing the example of the time taken for those PMUs.For a 275 kV to be completed within 2 to 3 years is already a miracle. The land acquisition is not an easy matter when it involves private land — in case the private owner contests the compensation of the land acquisition. The public thinks it is a wet market transaction. What’s saddening is the ang moh highlighting the problem (without exploring the cause of the problem), but the readers just believe it without any intention to understand the depth of the issues faced in the distribution. ~ Practical Example (Malaysia) PMU Serdang East (275 kV AIS): Took approximately 30 months from ground-breaking to energization. PMU Olak Lempit Upgrade (275/500 kV): Estimated project duration was 36 months due to complexity and transformer upgrades ~ The public who criticize these delays are like people asking why a baby can’t be born faster by getting nine women pregnant at the same time. If the ang moh wants to compare Malaysia with other countries — Thailand, the Philippines, or Australia — and if those countries truly can build a 275 kV substation faster, then yes, TNB should reflect on why others can deliver the "baby" sooner. But until we see that happening consistently elsewhere, the public needs to educate themselves. You can’t rush something that naturally takes time. Just like making a baby — it takes nine months, no matter how impatient you are. In this case - 275kV PMU need minimum time around 30-36 months ( if the existing site do not have any 275KV PMU) This is just my personal opinion, and I understand it may offend certain firms, especially those who design oversized infrastructure because their fees are tied to a percentage of the total construction cost. In my view, not all data centers necessarily require a 275 kV connection — in many cases, 132 kV might be sufficient. That said, the final decision ultimately lies with the operators and depends heavily on the project’s budget. On another note, for projects involving the government, the approval and development process can be significantly faster. I won’t name specific projects, but there are cases where 132 kV sites were delivered on a fast-track basis. It often comes down to whether the government is willing to support the project. Once the Land Acquisition Act is invoked for TNB (Tenaga Nasional Berhad), the project typically proceeds smoothly, with compensation matters handled afterward. Under Malaysian Acts, TNB can also leverage certain legal provisions ("Akta") to their advantage. Again, I’m just sharing some rough insights — no offense intended. |
|
|
Jun 9 2025, 05:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Oct 2012 |
QUOTE(Syie9^_^ @ Jun 6 2025, 01:16 PM) When Malaysia big hoo haa about Data Center; in reality lack of skilled talents. so if youre major in HVAC or Electrical Engineering. you win. eg.. 725...he says the developer is Jcrop which also own KFC, and dont understand why no KFC there? lmao! The jokes about phone being wrap in a bag which block the camera... why cannot tahan security and IP? u go all the electronics they do the same 8.30 - saying about modularize and being done hastly. Well- modular and skided equipment- are cheaper, faster and better QC compare to site/stick build. well.... i stop watching when i saw his half effort handsketch which is more like a joke, Syie9^_^ liked this post
|
|
|
Jun 9 2025, 06:11 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,072 posts Joined: Jun 2018 |
QUOTE(nihility @ Jun 9 2025, 01:35 PM) No one dare to reply your post but I appreciate your reply. One 275 kV PMU can theoretically power about 2.5 to 3 cities the size of Petaling Jaya at peak demand. The, 275kV demand is very huge ! even to put 275kV in; the area better be industrialised first...For a 275 kV to be completed within 2 to 3 years is already a miracle. The land acquisition is not an easy matter when it involves private land — in case the private owner contests the compensation of the land acquisition. The public thinks it is a wet market transaction. What’s saddening is the ang moh highlighting the problem (without exploring the cause of the problem), but the readers just believe it without any intention to understand the depth of the issues faced in the distribution. ~ Practical Example (Malaysia) PMU Serdang East (275 kV AIS): Took approximately 30 months from ground-breaking to energization. PMU Olak Lempit Upgrade (275/500 kV): Estimated project duration was 36 months due to complexity and transformer upgrades ~ The public who criticize these delays are like people asking why a baby can’t be born faster by getting nine women pregnant at the same time. If the ang moh wants to compare Malaysia with other countries — Thailand, the Philippines, or Australia — and if those countries truly can build a 275 kV substation faster, then yes, TNB should reflect on why others can deliver the "baby" sooner. But until we see that happening consistently elsewhere, the public needs to educate themselves. You can’t rush something that naturally takes time. Just like making a baby — it takes nine months, no matter how impatient you are. In this case - 275kV PMU need minimum time around 30-36 months ( if the existing site do not have any 275KV PMU) Else it be a joke for something out of nowhere and the next thing you know, cable cut by XXXX.. QUOTE(hjh87 @ Jun 9 2025, 06:52 PM) Thanks for providing the example of the time taken for those PMUs. yeah, I agree with 132kV. Will suffice to power up in stage. Overbuild also need to revise overtime.This is just my personal opinion, and I understand it may offend certain firms, especially those who design oversized infrastructure because their fees are tied to a percentage of the total construction cost. In my view, not all data centers necessarily require a 275 kV connection — in many cases, 132 kV might be sufficient. That said, the final decision ultimately lies with the operators and depends heavily on the project’s budget. On another note, for projects involving the government, the approval and development process can be significantly faster. I won’t name specific projects, but there are cases where 132 kV sites were delivered on a fast-track basis. It often comes down to whether the government is willing to support the project. Once the Land Acquisition Act is invoked for TNB (Tenaga Nasional Berhad), the project typically proceeds smoothly, with compensation matters handled afterward. Under Malaysian Acts, TNB can also leverage certain legal provisions ("Akta") to their advantage. Again, I’m just sharing some rough insights — no offense intended. QUOTE(Clueless07 @ Jun 9 2025, 07:17 PM) if u listen carefully - u will know this guy bla bla bla... complain for the sake of complain its youtube eg.. 725...he says the developer is Jcrop which also own KFC, and dont understand why no KFC there? lmao! The jokes about phone being wrap in a bag which block the camera... why cannot tahan security and IP? u go all the electronics they do the same 8.30 - saying about modularize and being done hastly. Well- modular and skided equipment- are cheaper, faster and better QC compare to site/stick build. well.... i stop watching when i saw his half effort handsketch which is more like a joke, |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 9 2025, 09:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,072 posts Joined: Jun 2018 |
QUOTE(Clueless07 @ Jun 9 2025, 07:17 PM) if u listen carefully - u will know this guy bla bla bla... complain for the sake of complain 24 > 99 > 200 MW. eg.. 725...he says the developer is Jcrop which also own KFC, and dont understand why no KFC there? lmao! The jokes about phone being wrap in a bag which block the camera... why cannot tahan security and IP? u go all the electronics they do the same 8.30 - saying about modularize and being done hastly. Well- modular and skided equipment- are cheaper, faster and better QC compare to site/stick build. well.... i stop watching when i saw his half effort handsketch which is more like a joke, |
|
|
Jun 10 2025, 04:58 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#55
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,603 posts Joined: Sep 2021 |
QUOTE(hjh87 @ Jun 9 2025, 05:22 PM) Thanks for providing the example of the time taken for those PMUs. No worries about causing offense — no one is getting offended, at least not me. This is a public forum, after all. We're here to share information, not to offend anyone or make enemies.This is just my personal opinion, and I understand it may offend certain firms, especially those who design oversized infrastructure because their fees are tied to a percentage of the total construction cost. In my view, not all data centers necessarily require a 275 kV connection — in many cases, 132 kV might be sufficient. That said, the final decision ultimately lies with the operators and depends heavily on the project’s budget. On another note, for projects involving the government, the approval and development process can be significantly faster. I won’t name specific projects, but there are cases where 132 kV sites were delivered on a fast-track basis. It often comes down to whether the government is willing to support the project. Once the Land Acquisition Act is invoked for TNB (Tenaga Nasional Berhad), the project typically proceeds smoothly, with compensation matters handled afterward. Under Malaysian Acts, TNB can also leverage certain legal provisions ("Akta") to their advantage. Again, I’m just sharing some rough insights — no offense intended. I appreciate your responses. hjh87 liked this post
|
|
|
Jun 11 2025, 09:59 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
1 posts Joined: Dec 2021 |
QUOTE(nihility @ Jun 9 2025, 12:05 PM) No one dare to reply your post but I appreciate your reply. One 275 kV PMU can theoretically power about 2.5 to 3 cities the size of Petaling Jaya at peak demand. The, 275kV demand is very huge ! I believe nowadays the 275kV CLS project completion lead time is much faster. (maybe 1 1/2 year) https://themalaysianreserve.com/2024/07/24/...tract-in-johor/For a 275 kV to be completed within 2 to 3 years is already a miracle. The land acquisition is not an easy matter when it involves private land — in case the private owner contests the compensation of the land acquisition. The public thinks it is a wet market transaction. What’s saddening is the ang moh highlighting the problem (without exploring the cause of the problem), but the readers just believe it without any intention to understand the depth of the issues faced in the distribution. ~ Practical Example (Malaysia) PMU Serdang East (275 kV AIS): Took approximately 30 months from ground-breaking to energization. PMU Olak Lempit Upgrade (275/500 kV): Estimated project duration was 36 months due to complexity and transformer upgrades ~ The public who criticize these delays are like people asking why a baby can’t be born faster by getting nine women pregnant at the same time. If the ang moh wants to compare Malaysia with other countries — Thailand, the Philippines, or Australia — and if those countries truly can build a 275 kV substation faster, then yes, TNB should reflect on why others can deliver the "baby" sooner. But until we see that happening consistently elsewhere, the public needs to educate themselves. You can’t rush something that naturally takes time. Just like making a baby — it takes nine months, no matter how impatient you are. In this case - 275kV PMU need minimum time around 30-36 months ( if the existing site do not have any 275KV PMU) This post has been edited by oranjeguy2021: Jun 11 2025, 09:59 AM |
|
|
Jun 11 2025, 10:53 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#57
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,799 posts Joined: May 2008 |
last year complain no google cloud, no aws, no microsoft, no zuck local dc.
now complain power , water and lack of skilled talents. |
|
|
Jun 11 2025, 11:06 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,072 posts Joined: Jun 2018 |
|
| Change to: | 0.0144sec
0.40
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 09:20 PM |