QUOTE(poooky @ Jun 4 2025, 03:58 PM)
You make good points, but all my confident in the system has been broken last few years. We all know it as much as we wan to believe the opposite.
Also there is no guarantee that ppl can remain employed in private all the way to 60. Most will be laid off many2 years before that so no more contribution. Any work they can fine maybe pay minimum wage at most unless they take out capital to do own business. Job for life is very lesser now.
For gov pencen, plenty of lifetime servants who keep head down and retired at 60, monthly draw around 7k+ not bad what. These days can live another 25 yrs. Then pass to spouse and children some more + other benefits for serving nation. If it is kacang putih as u imply they wouldn't have pushing civil servants to epf system because too expensive
Well yes, you can’t argue that government job security is one of the greatest peace of mind someone could have. Any other MNC job will just layoff staffs in the guise of “re-org” ie. Legally firing you.
However i strongly believe the govt move to push civil servants for epf is because epf business nature: investments is a great hedge againts inflation and has a proven track record of consistent profit, and the more capital epf has to work with, the more net profit they will get. Some split of their investors (ie.epf contributers), while the rest is plain profit for the epf organization.
It takes money to make serious money. Ie. If someone is holding onto 250k capital, it would take them 25~years to reach their first 1mil (assuming 5%~ rate again), while it takes the same person, just another 13years, to make their 2nd million, and it just snowballs greatly from there onwards.
My point is, the EPF organization undeniably is generating profit for the country, and the more ringgits they have, the more return in absolute ringgit value (not %s), that they will have. And how to load up the the EPF organization with even more capital? Forced contributions for all goverment servants. It is to benefit the EPF organization & govermental body first, and not the “rakyat”. I know from insiders info that there are multiple years that EPF’s profit rate was in the 12%~, while the investors are only getting 5% out of it. Heck even s&p500 is averaging 10% but with risks lah, so most ppl still ok or uneducated to let EPF fly with it.
There’s so many nuances you could argue from both side that it’s impractical to talk about in a forum format. Ie. Super stress free whole life, retirement no need think, special healthcare/room benefit for retiree, etc, but like i said earlier, if completely low risk, don’t expect great returns.