Now if the story is true the state immigration chief should come out and defend him.

From the story he appears to be honest and have been backing him.

He dont come out means...???

Look i trust when he say got cartel, but this other part i'm on the fence

From the story it looks the state immigration chief is clean. If this story is true he should come out to defend ...if not..??

I 100% believe got cartel, but this part of the story i'm now on the fence

This post has been edited by 9m2w: Mar 10 2025, 02:17 PM

Biggest mistakes were no b&w and didnt inform his superiors

Now is only his words vs others

“Suprised, i took the money”

Kekw

If any ktards here kene caught for receiving bribes red-handed, you can say you are undercover mole for kopitiam lowyat journalists.

Worse, MACC caught him 'red-handed in the act'. Now his only lifeline is the immigration director, who did not specifically say about the bribe (unsure if he even have proofs of their conversation).

Reminder to all, it's the legal system, NOT the justice system.

Also one thing that really sticks out for me is this.





Feb 26 they already say they have 20k on hand
Feb 28 he tried to coax into getting more evidence, yet when receiving the envelop, he's surprised it contains money (when they already said they have it)

this one machem those spy movie....

"Based on my own research, I had strong grounds to believe that the state immigration director was not linked to any corrupt activities or syndicates".

anneh playing 4d chess.......

by saying this, if someone is truly clean, he should come forward and help anneh as many people would exepct....

hope he has some records of his conversation with the person, else the person can just say this anney is just talking crap, none of this shit ever happened.

This post has been edited by Knnbuccb: Mar 10 2025, 03:08 PM

undercover should have spybodycam

But the journalist trusted him to share all the investigation details...

Anyway lets see how it goes. His side of the story already very flimsy.

MACC havent realised their side yet which should have whatsapp convo and other shit

Only fool belip him.

1. Want bongkar corruption but ask the most corrupted head to backup

2.he did mentioned in his article, he did research and study, the branch head of immigration is 100% clean of any corruption


100%

This journalist

Write so long, but I only see jokes


He should contact MACC to backup
Not the dept involved in corruption to backup

This post has been edited by ifourtos: Mar 10 2025, 02:41 PM

i watched too many movies, to know sometimes the real person behind is the one u trust the most

waiting for macha to show hand



hopefully

There are many possibilities here.

How come the MACC never bother to mention that they were looking for the agent to verify the story at all? I can also say that Immigration Department’s intelligence director probably works with the agent and trapped the guy.

"Based on my own research, I had strong grounds to believe that the state immigration director was not linked to any corrupt activities or syndicates".

anneh playing 4d chess.......

by saying this, if someone is truly clean, he should come forward and help anneh as many people would exepct....

hope he has some records of his conversation , else can just say this anney is just talking crap, none of this shit ever happened.

This post has been edited by Knnbuccb: Mar 10 2025, 03:07 PM

a huge risk he taking... if indeed true

rm20k is not enuff to bribe, but we do not know some1 might be cheapsake

if this guy not telling the truth, he should have become movie script writer, can do marehsia movie James Bon, 003A betrayed by his secret service head can earn more than 20k or 50k

This post has been edited by Knnbuccb: Mar 10 2025, 03:07 PM

He should be lucky to be still alive

moral of the story

don't be hero unless got title, minimum Datuk.

That's why I said repeatedly that he should not accept it blindly, before he accepted it, he should confirm it by saying something like:
"This envelope contains only evidence for the investigation?"

If the guy says the "envelope only contains evidence, nothing else."

Then the journalists can take the envelope and inspect the content, don't just simply surprisingly take it lol.

If no straight answer were given, completely refuse to take or touch the envelope.

The entire conversation needs to be recorded for evidence.

Also he accepts money as evidence also sounds suspicious as hell, what can the money prove anything without documents or softcopy?

This post has been edited by smsid: Mar 10 2025, 02:51 PM