Maybe because is using a 19'' wide ? I never tried 3dmark 06 with a wide but if the screen doesn't support 1280*1024 maybe he can't use it.

1440x900 almost equivalent to 1280x1024 in term of numbers of pixels. As you can see your SM2.0/3.0 scores lower than mine now

This post has been edited by r4st4m4n: Feb 27 2008, 09:05 AM

@0168257061...ur using palit also right like mine normal not sonic...like in ur siggy...
u clock it at 700/2000...but mine when clock to 700/2000 and stress with atitool got error/artifac la...

Samsung 931BW can run 3DMark06 at 1280 x 1024

why not... let me take a sceenie and show u later

---

Added on February 27, 2008, 5:56 pmmy vista ultimate can ... but my xp sp2 cant... duno why....

This post has been edited by vincentlaw: Feb 27 2008, 05:56 PM

here is it....no option of 1280x1024


Attached thumbnail(s)

dude its close enough.. +-300 points no biggie. and ure scores look right at default at those setting anyway..


This post has been edited by cstkl1: Feb 27 2008, 06:34 PM

but why no option for 1280x1024 ah.. vista got.. weird lla...hehe

just got my asus 8800gt top yesterday ..
only OC the PC cpu .. nothing done to grafik card at all ..
scores ok ahh ??

this one at different resolution ...

another one with 1440x900 res ..

about the same as mine....comparing 1440x900 bench, mine higher 500score coz i OC abit of GC out of it.... we both have the same specs/score i can say.. anyway how much ram u have on ur com?? what HDD ur winXp running on?

This post has been edited by vincentlaw: Feb 28 2008, 10:43 AM

2GB of RAM ..
HDD is 3yr old MAXTOR SATA .. hehehehe

anyone know anything about this PhysX thing ahh ???
seems to be cuttin edge stuff ...

if u have 2 cards in sli can lah..
1 card will render the graphics while the other will handle physics...
but for me cpu physics is enough, just take a look at havok physics engine powered games such as oblivion, hl2..

HI can i know why i couldnt install gc driver after i install vista ultimate? i alredi using 32bits and install with 32bits also.But i couldnt detect 32Bits..

what you mean u tried to install a 32-bit driver on a 32-bit vista ultimate but failed??
have u checked already whether the driver that u're installing is vista 32-bit or xp 32-bit driver

SLi ?? i dont think so la .. its a PCI card ... not gfx card leehh ..
i know the site says it says in physics calculations for some apps and games that carries the PhysX logo ..

what about games and apps that doesnt carry that PhysX logo ?? no difference ??

what?? are u talking about the normal physix card of the rumored physix engine that be run on an nvidia gpu??

Small update for ben.

Last night I played Crysis. It seems to be stable at 792/1944/950 @ 1.2V idle. At least it was for the whole 1+ hour I played it

More Crysis testing at 1.3V will come soon

This post has been edited by r4st4m4n: Feb 29 2008, 11:06 PM

nice bro... why dun try 800mhz core clock and 2200mhz memory clock...? im sure with HR03-gt can do that...

Ageia PhysX which is doing the technology is bought over by NVIDIA already i think .. so whatever PhysX thats coming out still comes from Ageia but maybe NVIDIA might market it under their own umbrella laa .. that is to be seen over the next year

as for new NVIDIA cards that comes out with PhysX .. for sure will be super duper expensive .. coz the PhysX PCI card alone will cost u around rm1.2k at this moment .. hehehehe ... i know coz i got my hands on one of those PhysX card to test test ..
but for games without the PhysX then it doesnt make any difference laa .. u can always go to the Ageia website to see the difference in gfx

as for whatever rumours that 9800gt will come around the rm1k or jsut over rm1k mark .. prepared to be surprised .. i was told by reliable source that it will cost around rm2.1k when it hits our shores .. prolly within the next 2-3 months ..