palm oil have no place as ingredients in ice cream in the first place. period.
in the same breath, replacing santan in ais kacang with santan sawit is dumb as fuck and a crime befits death penalty.

end of rant.

--

having said that,

using or NOT using sawit as an ingredient itself is not the issue here as far as the law goes.
does not matter if it is due to not being needed OR due to it being substituted with something else.

the issue is explicitly advertising that you are not using palm oil.

same as the ais kacang and cendol thing.

it's okay if you use or don't use santan sawit.

it's okay if you say you use "100% santan sawit" or "100% santan kelapa" or "100% susu seladang" or "100% susu biri-biri" or "100% susu badam" or "100% susu oat".

but you don't go advertise "ZERO sawit", regardless for it not being required ingredient or because you had substituted it with something else.

likewise, we ban the npo label because it was deemed to be counter productive and not in our country's interest.
your point again?

also, Thailand is as safe as Malaysia? :lol;

Try to spend more time in Thailand and you will realise.

Most if not all goldsmith in Thailand don't have armed security guard.

expanding further, Mar2024 Court ruling.

EU chastised for using outdated data to make a policy, and for using random 10yr cutoff to charge a 25yr-cycle planting as creating more pollution than annual-cycle planting.

in my own understanding: EU probably looked at the last 10yrs of 25yr-cycle as creating more tonnage of waste than the tonnage created by 10yrs of annual crops. if they looked at 25yrs, they might see that 25 cycles of annual crops generate more waste than 1 cycle of palm crop.

also, since palm only produce after 7yrs, it is not just to compare 3yrs of production against 10yrs of production in an arbitrary 10yrs window; of course the tonnage is different and appears to be low.



https://www.eco-business.com/news/in-landma...-biofuel-rules/

This post has been edited by Oltromen Ripot: May 4 2024, 11:20 AM

Ban or fine products with label "no pork, no lard" ?

Got any enforcement?

TLDR: discrimination against palm oil products is haram

Cannot display only. You can mask the "no palm oil" with a sticker n sell the product.

I think this is oversight from the shop. First time offense should lighter fine lah like RM10k fine.

interesting.

so does this law apply to explicit label on the packaging of produce?
or is it applicable as well to like [hang poster on premise].

--

i honestly haven't seen packaging that explicitly says anything about "no pork", "no pard", "no beef"; but maybe have come across "no alcohol".

--

does this rule apply to fragrance and perfume? or just food consumables?
this one confirm so many "no alcohol" label.

Got many restaurants with No Pork signs wat.

Tell that to the south thailand people, th Bangkok mall shooting victims n the countless shooting cases victims in Thailand over the years. They have gun control issues just like USA

What a waste of resources

Imagine the time and cost wasted just to put a fucking sticker over the no palm oil wording

I also got peanut oild bought to do mooncake but didn't dare to use it for a thing else fearing it would alter the taste of the food.

If shooting is regular, it won't be worldwide news.

Peanut oil is flavourful.

I agree but I also agree with government stand on no palm oil campaign by Europe. Europe is not doing anything t for the environment, they are doing it for $$$$$. If there is a European union country that have climate to plant oil palm, pretty sure palm oil will have any issues with them.

To distinguish from cheap and inferior products.

Next time just label "May contain: palm oil"

It's world wide news cause of mass casulties. Is Palestinian death at the hands of yahoodeeee regular? It's still in the news.

Flavourful yes but is the taste suitable for all dishes..

One need to stand from EU point of view to understand.

For reasons, what FTA negotiation with EU is suspended.

TS trying to stir shit.