Politicians are playing issues to garner votes for their parties.
You must understand which party stand for which set of people.

All parties in Malaysia are conservative populist,
PAS - Muslim
UMNO - Malay
Bersatu - Rural Malay
GPS - Sarawakian
DAP - Non Malay

Singapore only have PAP which basically ruled with an iron fist and
quickly ISAed the opposition by any means necessary.

Agong is what we need for check and balance (SG has the president),
hence most of the overboard racial/religious issue will be silenced by the state's sultan or the country's King.
Anyone who failed to adhere will be labeled derhaka.

Akmal was silenced by the Agong,
he did his part for the party,
his role was to be the instigator.
where politics will reward loyalty, handsomely.

You can bet that Akmal will rise up in ranks not so far in the future.
You can see similar things to Zahid (he was Youth Leader UMNO who being the scapegoat for Anwar Reformasi)
and Abang Jo (He was the butt of a joke in the local newspaper in late 80s)

When you are not loyal and refuse to play a role, you will be like KJ.

Ignore that guy. Singapore is racially stable compared to Malaysia. Period

1:3.5 and beyond

Close thread

I was referring to my earlier conversation with people who commutes

Of course if you have family at your home,
you will have more time compare to the commuters who wakes up early and go back late,
and doing that for 30 years just to get extra money from the currency exchange

Prove it.
Then why the list of riots are so long compared to Malaysia?

Once accident can cause a riot in Singapore, in Malaysia,
people can be more understandable for the situation

Try being a brown person walking in Singapore,
I got cursed more there than walking in the streets of Sydney or Madrid.

This post has been edited by seriosekitt3h: May 1 2024, 03:59 PM

Digging the bottom of the barrel to prove his point. Policies are like so different but still want to compare

Since it became a country, there has been no racial riots among its citizens.

And it does not matter the purpose of the policy, racist country is racist country. The racial tensions can be resolved thru non-racist methods but racist will surely choose racist method.

Biasalah that /k resident mental patient.
Everyday talk cock i kenal this menteri or went sampai north pole already.
As they said. Orang gila jangan dilayan.

Why do I need to prove it? The one that claim Singapore got racial issue is the one that need to proof their case

My only rebuttal is that 2013 Little India riot is done by drunkard Indians from India, nothing to do with local Indians...after that I've never heard of resentment towards Singaporean Indians. If Malaysian Indians go there with B40 attitude like the India Indians...not just locals but anyone will look down upon them

It’s obvious there are some here that have a bone to pick with Singapore and its success.

No need to try to convince them or change their minds.

Correct

You see thailand

They change government got riot and killing military coup

Remember when bangkok was in chaos

Malaysia never have such nonsense

First world vs 3rd world

1 SGD > 3 MYR



Nothing to compare

Here only 🍊 as PM, nuff said

Thailand has more political riots

Because you have nothing

Indonesia has more

Singapore is much safer period

holiday also all work so hard one ah

Kek. Orang gila sudah mari.
No tag nama pun sendiri mengaku gila ini.

Singapore have 2 racial riots between locals (1964 and 1969) and one racial riot between foreigners (2013).
Malaysia only have one (1969).

Stop lying.

Even so, declaring Singapore as country on 1965,
they have equal amount race riot (1 in 1969) amongst its citizen
just like Malaysia had.