Prohibition has never worked in human history.

America did it, and all that happened was the rise of illicit liquor sales and bootleggers smuggling alcohol from across Canada and the rise of underground distilleries (speakeasies).

Humans will always look for ways to satisfy their cravings no matter what. If you ban something, they will just look for another addiction to fill up that hole instead.

Cmon la ethnicities ain't the issue, liquors are the issue. Ban jer liquors then every Malaysians are kind people.

you can still enforce ban on drinking in public. Singapore did that and public nuisance cases decreased. If you have to drink, drink in a pub or bar or in the confines of your home

Prohibition has never worked in human history.

America did it, and all that happened was the rise of illicit liquor sales and bootleggers smuggling alcohol from across Canada and the rise of underground distilleries (speakeasies).

Humans will always look for ways to satisfy their cravings no matter what. If you ban something, they will just look for another addiction to fill up that hole instead.

Yes not all drinks but those who do conlanfirm will be rowdy. I challenge anyone to go near these ppl at a bar or even kopitiam after “they” are drunk.

i raise your challenge. try going near them after they're drunk at a seafood restaurant in port klang.

Liquors have been around for 70+ years in msia, consumed by non muslim since. Only of late 20+ years since, pemabuks have been a public nuisance. Likewise for gangsterism, i am not saying gangsterism only exist then, memang gangsterism has it root way back to the mining era.

That time liquor associating with night clubs, karaokes, street of pubs were somehow not as bad as now (just a small roadside group having their bottles also can turn ugly)

Why so? After plantation lands have been gradually converted to development over the years.

The rest, you can join the dots.

The issue is how well you hold your liquor (not how much you can drink but mannered drinking). This goes back to your home upbringing regardless of race

and yet nobody is asking if MIC practicing double standard.

they went through the difficulties of making the seller apologise.
but supposedly no effort was spent to look for supposedly-Indian drunkards that led to the seller's refusal, to get them to apologise to the seller.

Tipu la. Pemabuk try to divide and conquer just like penjajah

Guinness campur todi? Best combo!

What the ice cream seller did may not be right, but the reaction does not seem to be apt; "punishment doesn't fit the crime".

Actually the one that really maxed out the situation would be MIC. The girl said the guy don't want to sell to indians. She never said boycott the ice cream seller because he discriminate indians. She even posted a follow up video saying the guy said sorry and don't viral the guy. MIC yang sibuk mintak dia buat apology video. Also, she did not hide the truth saying the guy saja tak nak jual; she mention and posted the police report in her video. The original article just conveniently left it out.

Again, the guy is not the main issue, its the attitude to blanket ban a society based on a few that is the issues. Also the media telling half truth to get clicks and rile people up.

Chinese most non racist. As long u got money don't care human or alien they will sell whatever to u. Other race just think they more superior in whatever way