But the narrative now going hard, and I see a lot of fanbase, even some in this forum, they got baited so hard in the idea of changing the manager.
'He spent 400+ mil on players that he wants'
- Sure or not, those are his first choice players. Maybe Martinez, Onana, Anthony, Malacia, MM I can consider.
- Does not help when our recruitment strategy is like shit doing negotiation, then kena game to pay inflated price.
'He is still playing underperforming players week-in, week-out'
- Of course. Some position are his 2nd or 3rd choices, from his available squad that his able to pick from.
- Obviously there is a falling out between Varane and him, but that's the managers decision to manage players to toe the line. If SAF can be commended as a disciplinarian, why can't ETH put down his own disciplinarian law to either follow my way or the highway
- Rashford has gone back to being thrash after playing his heart out for a contract bump.
'No style of playing'
- How can they be a style of play when the players themselves are undermining his direction.
- Playing McT, Rash, Martial, is like fielding ghost to the field. Non-existent
But oh no, let's sack the manager, then a new one comes in, then another round of feel good factor until the training regimen becomes too easy or too hard, then whelp, let's throw the manager under the bus again.
lol you are talking all the points i been saying this whole season... hahhaa... for me, the change of the top management is more important than changing ETH... we need an edu kind of personnel at the top level of the club to support the manager... not those arnold john david glazers ass-lickers... after that we can chg ETH or whoever we want.. now under Sir Rat, hopefully the top mgmt can chg abit... get maldini or whoever with footballing experience to come in...
and paling funny are those fans asking why we still blame the glazers, they got 'give' money to ETH to buy players right? this statement is such a joke, supporting the club for so long still can ask this question... in the EPL, i think glazers are the only owner that injected zero cash from their pocket to the club and add on a gigantic debt hanging on the club balance sheet upon acquisition done... even liverpool stingy US boss also willing to open their wallet to support Klopp...