QUOTE(ronnie @ Apr 5 2024, 03:54 PM)
the effort of 4941 vs 5000 per savings pocket is lower 85 sen less on the 4941 effort
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
QUOTE(ronnie @ Apr 5 2024, 04:41 PM)
Did you even count what i wrote.... do i have to spoon feed the calculation ?
RM591.45 includes 30-day base 3% in Main account of GX
RM4961.29 x 10 = RM49612.90 + RM591.45 = RM50204.35
wow.. your own table like trash still got the gal to talk about spoonfeeding...?
topkek.
actually i dont even need to calculate anything. It's just pure logic. No idea why you fail to see this.
If 4941 and 5000 getting same returns per day of 0.68. then with additional 59 x 10 = 590 of ADDITIONAL unused capital, it will 100% mean i will have additional returns if i put it somewhere, anywhere.
But nvm, let me disprove you since you think you some smart alec with tables and all
i only checked for 10th ~ 16th, not bothered with the rest cause i know your data is pure trash.
with base of 4941:
by 16th should have 4945.08
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
meanwhile, your trash table comes out to 4945.05
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Here already 3 cents short.
with base of 5000:
by 16th should have 5004.08
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
meanwhile, your trash table comes out to 5004.10
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Here 2 cents extra.
So total difference (WRONGLY in favour of 5000 base) already extra 5 cents just for 6 days. The other 24 days??
Also come on man, 590 x 3% /366 = 0.05/day x 30 = 1.50 liao total return would be 591.50
dont know where you pluck 591.45 from. you too hungry until eat the 5 cents is it?
All the way to the end, your base 5000 calculations keep adding cents, while base 4941 calculations short of cents.