Are u joking renew lease hold 10k only? Regardless of the land/house value?

maybe in ulu place where there is no market

but not in high demand area

lease & free, both 800k original 40yr condition

Doesnt matter, leasehold can be renew freehold doe t mea. Forever, government want it can take it back

This post has been edited by kelvinfixx: Feb 18 2023, 10:20 AM

Generally, just go for freehold. less headache and higher value.
It doesnt matter what some may think, but the general consensus of msia market is fhold > lhold.

but at the end location would be most important.

developer is my wife's employer, bought with some discounts

RM83.5k, unheard off and unimaginable price 11 years ago. 3 rooms, 2 bathroom. porch for 2 cars, 3 if 2 of them are hatch back. backyard enough space to put a van or a small lorry. 2nd hand leasehold or not, for that price it's a steal.

Cheap price no good. That's why the developer don't want to renew

and it's in Langkawi. ba da boom!

Hahahhaha but you paid premium early on too.
remember your loan charges etc. you think you earn a lot?

Lease and freehold developer selling price different is not alot if you are not aware yo ....

This post has been edited by etan26: Feb 18 2023, 01:06 PM

This is a no brainer question. Freehold is always better than leasehold. Freehold property will command a premium over a leasehold equivalent property. Those who advocate leasehold is better than freehold are only comforting themselves.

The only thing good about leasehold is when the property is your investment property because leasehold tends to give higher rental yield because of the lower purchase price.

This post has been edited by Donidoni: Feb 18 2023, 03:37 PM

I have seen people die die must take freehold, end up at far location and burn 1 hour per day commuting one way

Yes , resale value may be better but at the cost of 2 hour per day back and forth ?

This post has been edited by killdavid: Feb 18 2023, 03:28 PM