For example:
Ephesians-->to the saints, AND to the faithful
Colossians--> to the saints AND faithful brethren
Galations-->All the brethren..
And the list goes on…
We must not ignore the following verses that shows Paul’s letters are for not just SAINTS, but also for Christians which ARE SAINTS.
Romans 1:7, “To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.”
All in Rome, called to be saints.. Again, this we know, includes GENTILES and JEWS. And we know not just those in ROME, but those who were beloved by God are called to be SAINTS.
Ephesians 2:19,” Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;”
Just before Ephesians 2:19, Paul was talking about salvation, how Gentiles as well, were loved by God.
Colossians 1:12
So let no one confuse you that Christians, are not saints.
From Romans 1:7 and Ephesians 2:19, we know Jews, Gentiles, were called to be saints.

HEBREWS.11: = 32 And what more shall I say? For the time would fail me to tell of Gideon and Barak and Samson and Jephthah, also of David and Samuel and the prophets: 33 who through faith subdued kingdoms, worked righteousness, obtained promises, stopped the mouths of lions, 34 quenched the violence of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, out of weakness were made strong, became valiant in battle, turned to flight the armies of the aliens. 35 Women received their dead raised to life again.

Others were tortured, not accepting deliverance, that they might obtain a better resurrection. 36 Still others had trial of mockings and scourgings, yes, and of chains and imprisonment. 37 They were stoned, they were sawn in two, were tempted, were slain with the sword. They wandered about in sheepskins and goatskins, being destitute, afflicted, tormented— 38 of whom the world was not worthy. They wandered in deserts and mountains, in dens and caves of the earth.

How come you and other Christian "saints" are not doing or experiencing the above events mentioned in (likely.?) Paul's epistle/letter to the Hebrews or Jewish Christians.?
....... Or do or be the below in Paul's letter to the Corinthians.?, .......

1CORINTHIANS.12: = 7 But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to each one for the profit of all: 8 for to one is given the word of wisdom through the Spirit, to another the word of knowledge through the same Spirit, 9 to another faith by the same Spirit, to another gifts of healings by the same Spirit, 10 to another the working of miracles, to another prophecy, to another discerning of spirits, to another different kinds of tongues, to another the interpretation of tongues. ...

.
28 And God has appointed these in the church: first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, administrations, varieties of tongues. 29 Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Are all workers of miracles? 30 Do all have gifts of healings? Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret? 31 But earnestly desire the best gifts. And yet I show you a more excellent way.

Are you and today's Christian "saints" the  Roman or Ephesian or Hebrew Christian or Corinthian or Philippian or Galatian or etc personally addressed by apostle Paul in his letters/epistles.?

hence, the Bible/Scripture should be read in-context and interpreted correctly, ie the deeds and experiences in HEBREWS.11 does not apply to you or me or ALL Christian "saints", as you quoted EPHESIANS.1:1-5 out-of-context as applying to ALL Christian "saints" in other times and other regions as already chosen/elected and predestined by God like those faithful saints in the Church of Ephesus in 1st century AD.
.
No la, only God can decide who are the true saints, eg will you or me or other Christians today lose faith in Christ or keep the faith/be faithful to Christ until death or etc.?
.


My 3 questions were, .......

How come you and ALL other Christian "saints" are not doing or experiencing the above events mentioned in (likely.?) Paul's epistle/letter to the Hebrews or Jewish Christians at around 60AD.?
....... Or do or be the below in Paul's letter to the Corinthians at around the same time as HEBREWS.?, .......

Are you and ALL of today's Christian "saints" the Romans or Ephesians or Hebrew Christians or Corinthians or Philippians or Galatians or etc personally addressed by apostle Paul in his letters/epistles dated in 1st century AD.?
.
No la, you did not answer my 3 questions, eg by now you saying HEBREWS.11 should be quoted in-context as applying only to OT figures/people, and not to ALL Christian "saints". Isn't this being double-minded.? .......

PSALM.119:113 = I hate the double-minded,
But I love Your law.

= hence, the Bible/Scripture should be read in-context and interpreted correctly, ie the deeds and experiences in HEBREWS.11 does not apply to you or me or ALL Christian "saints", as you quoted EPHESIANS.1:1-5 out-of-context as applying to ALL Christian "saints" in other times and other regions as already chosen/elected and predestined by God like those faithful saints in the Church of Ephesus in 1st century AD.
.
No la, only God can decide who are the true saints, eg will you or me or other Christians today lose faith in Christ or keep the faith/be faithful to Christ until death or etc.?
.


My 3 questions were, .......

How come you and ALL other Christian "saints" are not doing or experiencing the above events mentioned in (likely.?) Paul's epistle/letter to the Hebrews or Jewish Christians at around 60AD.?
....... Or do or be the below in Paul's letter to the Corinthians at around the same time as HEBREWS.?, .......

Are you and ALL of today's Christian "saints" the Romans or Ephesians or Hebrew Christians or Corinthians or Philippians or Galatians or etc personally addressed by apostle Paul in his letters/epistles dated in 1st century AD.?
.
No la, you did not answer my 3 questions, eg by now you saying HEBREWS.11 should be quoted in-context as applying only to OT figures/people, and not to ALL Christian "saints". Isn't this being double-minded.? .......

PSALM.119:113 = I hate the double-minded,
But I love Your law.

EPHESIANS.1: (NKJV) = 1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God,

To the saints who are in Ephesus, and faithful in Christ Jesus: ...
.
So, is it true that there is nothing "you" or "we" or "a person" or other Christians today can do to lose his/her salvation.?, ...
.... as per your misinterpretation and reading out-of-context EPHESIANS.1:1-5 that the Bible passage also applies to you and me, or other Christian "saints" today or in other times or other regions, and not just to the faithful saints in the Church of Ephesus in 1st century AD.?

The letter of Ephesians was a letter addressed personally by apostle Paul to the faithful saints in the Church of Ephesus in 1st century AD, as were ALL (.?) his other letters, eg to the faithful saints in the Church of Philippi, Rome, Corinth, Galatia, etc. .......
.

1TIMOTHY.4: (NKJV) = The Great Apostasy

4 Now the Spirit expressly says that in latter times some will depart from the faith, giving heed to deceiving spirits and doctrines of demons, 2 speaking lies in hypocrisy, having their own conscience seared with a hot iron,  ...
1TIMOTHY.5: = 11 But refuse the younger widows; for when they have begun to grow wanton against Christ, they desire to marry, 12 having condemnation because they have cast off their first faith. 13 And besides they learn to be idle, wandering about from house to house, and not only idle but also gossips and busybodies, saying things which they ought not.

1TIMOTHY.1: = 18 This charge I commit to you, son Timothy, according to the prophecies previously made concerning you, that by them you may wage the good warfare, 19 having faith and a good conscience, which some having rejected, concerning the faith have suffered shipwreck, 20 of whom are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I delivered to Satan that they may learn not to blaspheme.

= you must first have the faith (in Christ) before you can depart from the faith or cast off the faith or have the faith suffer shipwreck.
....... = lose faith in Christ = lose salvation from hell when you die.

Besides misinterpreting and quoting out-of-context the Scripture/Bible, and being self-righteous, seems you have also self-appointed yourself as the guardian of Bible truths or as the TS/judge/watchman of this thread.  .......

EZEKIEL.3: (NKJV) = Ezekiel Is a Watchman

16 Now it came to pass at the end of seven days that the word of the Lord came to me, saying, 17 “Son of man, I have made you a watchman for the house of Israel; therefore hear a word from My mouth, and give them warning from Me: 18 When I say to the wicked, ‘You shall surely die,’ and you give him no warning, nor speak to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life, that same wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at your hand. 19 Yet, if you warn the wicked, and he does not turn from his wickedness, nor from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but you have delivered your soul.
.

"Today, it is not uncommon to hear the doctrine of ‘Once Saved Always Saved‘ proclaimed in many sermons and books. It is through sermons and books that many ‘Christians’ today believe the doctrine. Most people that simply read the Bible, come to different conclusions.

This popular nickname ‘Once Saved Always Saved’ has its systematic reformed origins in the Calvinist doctrine of the ‘Perseverance of the Saints’. This doctrine was devoutly affirmed by 2nd generation reformers and is most associated with 1st generation reformer, John Calvin.

Calvin was an excellent Theologian and his reforms centralised around Geneva. His influence on the reformation was considerable but the main core reformed doctrine was Lutheran. Luther attempted to reform the Church by getting back to Scripture. His conviction was the ‘the Gospel cannot be denied for the word of man’.

Unfortunately, by today’s standards, it is very difficult for any Christian to merely believe what the Bible says. I say this because the Church of today has been corrupted by argumentation and interpretation. So it is, in these times that my personal attempts to proclaim truth and find truth of Scripture and believe it, is very difficult. So often those who merely believe what the Bible says are the ones labelled the total opposite.

However, we are not here to please men. Men may interpret the Bible, but they are not above it. So it is that I come to my point. The popular doctrine of ‘Once Saved Always Saved’ has a major historic anomaly attached to it. Thorough research reveals that the doctrine was not taught in mainstream Christianity until the time of John Calvin or later in the 17th century at the Synod of Dort (1618). Some claim that Augustine of Hippo taught it? others that the doctrine is Gnostic.

Difficult as it may seem to grasp, it appears that the doctrine of ‘Once Saved Always Saved’ has its early origins in Gnosticism and not Christianity. We know this because Irenaeus refuted an early form of it in Against Heresies. Book 1. Chapter 6. The connection to Calvin being that Augustine was influenced by Gnosticism because of his prior belief in Manichaeism and Calvin relied upon Augustine as an authority on Scripture and quoted him more than any other theologian. However, there is reasonable doubt whether or not Augustine ever taught ‘Once Saved Always Saved’?

But outside of these references, the doctrine is not to be found.

This presents a major problem; unconditional eternal security was not taught by the ancient Christian Church, and is, in fact alien to historic Christianity before the 16th century.

This presents a major problem for those who claim their beliefs are absolutely Scriptural. It asks an unanswered question; If ‘Once Saved Always Saved’ is absolutely Scriptural, as some preachers claim, how could a doctrine of such massive importance lay untaught within Christianity for almost 1500 years? If the doctrine was so clearly taught in Scripture, as many moderns claim, then why didn’t the early Church teach it?

Why did the doctrine only come to light in the 16th century?"

John Calvin was wrong in his belief about this doctrine. He did many things right, but he was off track here. I have great respect about his beliefs that salvation was gained through faith alone and that he regarded the bible as the only source of religious truth. John Calvin had a logical, razor-sharp mind. His ideas had a profound effect on the direction of the Reformation.
Calvin was born in France and trained as a priest and lawyer. In 1536, Calvin published the Institutes of the Christian Religion. This book told of his religious beliefs. But somewhere during this time he began to entertain the thought of predestination, the idea that God had long ago determined who would gain salvation and who wouldn’t.
To Calvinists, the world was divided into two kinds of people, saints and sinners. A Calvinist tries to live like a saint, believing that only those who were saved could live true Christian lives. The performance of living a Christian life and keeping all of the rules flies in the face of his belief that salvation was gained through faith and grace alone. It is a sharp contradiction and a slippery slope. Galatians talks about that conflict. But that is another story.

Romans 8

29 “For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed into the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. 30 Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he also called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified”. Ephesians 1 3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ,4 just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love, 5 having predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will, 6 to the praise of the glory of His grace, by which He made us accepted in the Beloved.
7 In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of His grace

8 which He made to abound toward us in all wisdom and prudence,

9 having made known to us the mystery of His will, according to His good pleasure which He purposed in Himself, 10 that in the dispensation of the fullness of the times He might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven and which are on earth—in Him.11 In Him also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestined according to the purpose of Him who works all things according to the counsel of His will, 12 that we who first trusted in Christ should be to the praise of His glory.
13 In Him you also trusted, after you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation; in whom also, having believed, you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, 14 who is the guarantee of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, to the praise of His glory.

God determined beforehand that those who believe in Christ will be adopted into his family and conformed to his Son. I believe in predestination as a people group. We are all called, but not as an individual. Individual predestination is misguided. We must individually hear the gospel and believe its message. We must appreciate the true condition of the fallen state of man and the plan of redemption that God provided for us if we will receive His precious gift. While it is true that man cannot come to God except he be drawn, that man still has to exercise his own independent choice to receive God’s invitation.
This brings us to the big question. Does God know all things? Does he know that I am going to be saved or lost at the end of my days? It reminds me of the trick question kids asked in school about God. “Is God so great that he can create a rock that he can’t lift?” We smile at that but it is true that many people want to know what God knows. Does he know before I am born that I will accept him or reject him and thereby seal my eternal destination? And if he does know, doesn’t he share a little of the responsibility for it?
There are two schools of thought. The first is that God gave mankind the power to pro-create after his kind, which is based on the choice and stewardship of the creature and not God. And that God knew in advance, even though he is not responsible for the birth which direction the child would choose. But even in this case, the child is not predestined in either direction.

It is true that He knows if there is or evil in my heart because he can search the heart. But independent choices don’t fall in that context. God will speak to us and has a plan for us. But the level of our creation puts us in an exclusive position. We are made in His image and His likeness. We are created in the God-Class; Psalms 8:5 (NKJV) “For You have made him a little lower than the angels, And You have crowned him with glory and honor.” This translation should be “God” and not “Angels”. The angels were not crowned with glory and honor and God did not put all things under their feet. This is speaking of us. We are created in the image of God. We are the Body of Christ.
This puts us in the unique position of making a choice or decision that is creative and unplanned. Something out of the scope of God’s determined will. We can make choices that are in His will and out of His will. 2 Peter 3:9 (KJV) said, “It’s not His will that any should parish but that all come to repentance,” but we know that they do parish.
So God doesn’t necessarily know across the board what man will do. He calls the human race to himself, and sends us as believers into the streets to compel the lost to come in. He stands at the door of every heart and knocks. If any man will open, he will come in and make his abode and sup with him. But we, being created in His image, hold the unique position of independent choice.