yush... nid make f2l faster... bad mephisto 1 is gud?
Hobbies Rubik's thread, Hello new here
Hobbies Rubik's thread, Hello new here
|
|
Apr 4 2010, 01:17 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
1 posts Joined: Nov 2009 |
yush... nid make f2l faster... bad mephisto 1 is gud?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2010, 01:27 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
QUOTE(luciankanto @ Apr 4 2010, 01:07 AM) Most importantly, do your solve F2L intuitively or spam algorithms? Added on April 4, 2010, 1:29 am QUOTE(luciankanto @ Apr 4 2010, 01:17 AM) Yes his tutorial is very good indeed! This post has been edited by -kytz-: Apr 4 2010, 01:29 AM |
|
|
Apr 4 2010, 01:30 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,257 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7 |
He's damn funny. I asked him if his cross plus last layer is 10secs and he said cross 10secs.
Then he say F2L 40secs That's already 50secs without last layer. How can you solve last layer with 0 secs unless he's not at sub50 |
|
|
Apr 4 2010, 01:39 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
I think it's more of a misunderstanding rather than sarcasm
Experience, you do beginner's method OLL/PLL?Is your F2L done intuitively or spamming algorithms or both? |
|
|
Apr 4 2010, 01:44 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,257 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7 |
QUOTE(-kytz- @ Apr 4 2010, 01:39 AM) I think it's more of a misunderstanding rather than sarcasm Well I hope it's the former.Experience, you do beginner's method OLL/PLL?Is your F2L done intuitively or spamming algorithms or both? 3 look OLL PLL. F2L intuitive. I only memorised one algorithm, and I always turn the wrong way Added on April 4, 2010, 1:57 amWhat about you? I might start memorising OLL and PLL if I can't get past sub50 This post has been edited by eXPeri3nc3: Apr 4 2010, 01:57 AM |
|
|
Apr 4 2010, 01:58 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
I guess experience comes into hand here.Once your more familiar with setting up cases, you'll be spamming algos in no time.Heck, i only know one or two-the rest are intuitive
Yeah, one more thing i learned is reduce the number of cube rotations.Will help a lot in speedcubing This post has been edited by -kytz-: Apr 4 2010, 01:59 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2010, 02:05 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,257 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7 |
QUOTE(-kytz- @ Apr 4 2010, 01:58 AM) I guess experience comes into hand here.Once your more familiar with setting up cases, you'll be spamming algos in no time.Heck, i only know one or two-the rest are intuitive Yeah. But the ironic part is I perform better if I do cube rotations Yeah, one more thing i learned is reduce the number of cube rotations.Will help a lot in speedcubing By setting up cases you mean executing F2L algorithms to get the setup you want? |
|
|
Apr 4 2010, 02:12 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
QUOTE(eXPeri3nc3 @ Apr 4 2010, 02:05 AM) Yeah. But the ironic part is I perform better if I do cube rotations By setting up cases i mean setting up the pairs before insertion.This is where most cube rotations are done at iinm. By setting up cases you mean executing F2L algorithms to get the setup you want? Heck, i also do cube rotations a lot hence my slow times Now trying to learn F2L algos and OLL/PLL cases This post has been edited by -kytz-: Apr 4 2010, 02:13 AM |
|
|
Apr 4 2010, 02:23 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,257 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7 |
QUOTE(-kytz- @ Apr 4 2010, 02:12 AM) By setting up cases i mean setting up the pairs before insertion.This is where most cube rotations are done at iinm. I see.Heck, i also do cube rotations a lot hence my slow times Now trying to learn F2L algos and OLL/PLL cases I somehow managed to minimize my cube rotation and insert slightly faster now. Metronome did helped a bit. Guess I'm back to practice slow slotting till I can see everything haha. It works better for me that way. Regardless, I hope I'll get over with my stucking cube. >.> I suck at slotting on the left. Right no problem. Behind forget it. I'll read up on PLL most likely. Soon. Not so soon maybe. |
|
|
Apr 4 2010, 02:27 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
QUOTE(eXPeri3nc3 @ Apr 4 2010, 02:23 AM) I see. Nice I somehow managed to minimize my cube rotation and insert slightly faster now. Metronome did helped a bit. Guess I'm back to practice slow slotting till I can see everything haha. It works better for me that way. Regardless, I hope I'll get over with my stucking cube. >.> I suck at slotting on the left. Right no problem. Behind forget it. I'll read up on PLL most likely. Soon. Not so soon maybe. |
|
|
Apr 4 2010, 12:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
620 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: Kay-Elle |
Now 2 of you are the most active ones in this thread, lol......
I'm learning the full OLL for now, progressing quite slow because of my heavy school work and my finals is coming soon...... By the way, does memorizing F2L algorithms help??? I mean, is it effective to cut down your F2L time??? |
|
|
Apr 4 2010, 12:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,257 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7 |
Theoretically, memorizing algorithms will make your muscle work at a faster rate (muscle memory), so it should be faster.
But I don't know since I'm intuitive But my intuitive also a lot on muscle memory. But still need to 'see' when I turn as sometimes I flip to the wrong side lol. |
|
|
Apr 4 2010, 03:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
620 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: Kay-Elle |
QUOTE(eXPeri3nc3 @ Apr 4 2010, 12:55 PM) Theoretically, memorizing algorithms will make your muscle work at a faster rate (muscle memory), so it should be faster. Hmm, sounds logical.....But I don't know since I'm intuitive But my intuitive also a lot on muscle memory. But still need to 'see' when I turn as sometimes I flip to the wrong side lol. Although I'm using intuitive F2L, but I've kinda created my own algorithms, so it's implemented to my muscles, lol...... I'm sure some of them are not minimal in moves, but at least I execute them smoothly.... So while I'm inserting a pair, I'm already looking for the next.... |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2010, 03:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,257 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7 |
QUOTE(chungdavi @ Apr 4 2010, 03:38 PM) Hmm, sounds logical..... I'm still mastering my cross. I can't lookahead during the 15secs as I'll get lost.Although I'm using intuitive F2L, but I've kinda created my own algorithms, so it's implemented to my muscles, lol...... I'm sure some of them are not minimal in moves, but at least I execute them smoothly.... So while I'm inserting a pair, I'm already looking for the next.... I go impromptu and seems faster that way lol as I don't give a shit to shorter turns as long as I get the cross done. Nice you create your own algos. I need to learn lookahead for F2L already, not that good in it. |
|
|
Apr 4 2010, 04:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
620 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: Kay-Elle |
QUOTE(eXPeri3nc3 @ Apr 4 2010, 03:41 PM) I'm still mastering my cross. I can't lookahead during the 15secs as I'll get lost. Hmm, my skills on setting up the cross is still weak as well.....those strong cubers are able to plan the moves for the cross, and even the 1st pair if possible, during the 15sec inspection.....I go impromptu and seems faster that way lol as I don't give a shit to shorter turns as long as I get the cross done. Nice you create your own algos. I need to learn lookahead for F2L already, not that good in it. And I just able to plan to set up 2 or 3 edge pieces of the cross during inspection, or set up whole thing if the cross was easy.... For easier look ahead for setting up pairs, most of the cubers will do the cross on the bottom face as well, so while setting up the cross, they can already looking for pair pieces on top angle..... This is even tougher to do, lol....... |
|
|
Apr 4 2010, 04:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,257 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7 |
QUOTE(chungdavi @ Apr 4 2010, 04:06 PM) Hmm, my skills on setting up the cross is still weak as well.....those strong cubers are able to plan the moves for the cross, and even the 1st pair if possible, during the 15sec inspection..... That's why I say screw it I'll pick it up over time And I just able to plan to set up 2 or 3 edge pieces of the cross during inspection, or set up whole thing if the cross was easy.... For easier look ahead for setting up pairs, most of the cubers will do the cross on the bottom face as well, so while setting up the cross, they can already looking for pair pieces on top angle..... This is even tougher to do, lol....... |
|
|
Apr 4 2010, 08:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
Why not we post our youtube channels here so that we can keep updated?
Mine is http://www.youtube.com/Acubeist And yes we should subscribe to each other.Sharing is caring Don't bother with that video.It's already old This post has been edited by -kytz-: Apr 4 2010, 08:43 PM |
|
|
Apr 4 2010, 09:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,257 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7 |
I forgot my youtube dy.
Wait ah. http://www.youtube.com/user/eXPeri3nc3?feature=mhw5 Damn long time the vid don't bother. It's too old Will take my latest solving time with my cam soon. Don't expect sub40 though, unless it's a lucky solve XD |
|
|
Apr 4 2010, 09:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
Subsribed!Subsribe me back!
|
|
|
Apr 4 2010, 09:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,257 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7 |
Swt so fast
|
| Change to: | 0.0523sec
0.74
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 01:01 AM |