Of identity, culture and tacticsThere are not many clubs with a pre-defined club identity in the way most fans think of it. Most would associate club identity around style of play, but very little clubs have such a self defined club identity. The most obvious would be
Ajax and
Barcelona with their possession based style of play. Even this identity was adopted after the influence of Johan Cryuff. Before him, the style of play differed with the manager and the times.
Club identity doesn't just revolve around style of play. It could be non-tactical reasons too. Take
Athletic Bilbao. Since 1912, they have a policy of only allowing plyaers born in the Basque country or have learned their football skills at a Basque club to play for them.
Real Madrid. They are not definied by any footballing philosophy. Their club identity revolves around being the best club in the world where the best players come to play.
Chelsea. Abramovich famously hired Carlo Ancellotti with a brief to instil a club identity of possession football as Chelsea at the time came to be defined by the personalities of it's players. Terry. Drogba. Lampard. Being hard nosed, methodical, hard to beat. That ended up with Carlo's sacking even though he was winning games. It is not something that you do within one or two years. If anything, I would say Chelsea are efficient. They go about their business in a very efficient manner. New manager? We will get the signings you want. Bang. Transfer done. Bang. Transfer done. Bang. Transfer done. That's just the last transfer window. And the manager gets what he wants. But if he doesn't perform? Bang, he's out. Lampard in half a season. Ruthlessly efficient.
Liverpool. They have history but less of a defined club identity. Even their Gegenpress style of play is very recent. Started by Rodgers and revolutionised by Klopp. I can probably dive into this story next time.
What of
Manchester United? What is our club identity?
Winning titles? That is not an identity.
Some fans would say playing with wingers in a 4-4-2. The same people who criticised Carlos Queroz for tinering the formation into a 4-3-3 in the early naughties and breaking with 'tradition'. Until 2008 at least. Then these bunch were mostly silent.
I would like to think Manchester United represented youth. For the past 80 years since 1937, Manchester United have played at least one academy graduate is represented in the matchday squad. The Busby Babes. The Class of 92. This is our success and something the club stands for.
Van Gaal is probably the manager that has done the most for youth after Sir Alex. He has offerred chances and integrated youth players into his squads.
How does our current manager measure up this season?
I will exclude Greenwood because his talent is such that he will walk into most first team squads in the Premier League.
Plus, our non-existent RW makes me struggle to name any other players challenging for that slot.
We have Axel Tuanzebe. Brandon Williams. Shoretire recently.
All whom I feel have been handled poorly. With the poor squad rotation in favour of grinding out results, youth have not been really given a chance.
Tuanzebe did well locking down Neymar & Mbappe in Oct, and I expected him to start a few games after but he was dropped for weeks after. He only came back into the team in Dec and unfortunately deflected an own goal. The thing with football players is, you cannot keep them out of the team for weeks and throw them in expecting them to be 100%. Especially youth. Tuanzebe has been missing ever since. Which is unfortunate.
Brandon Williams was so concerned about his lack of match time that he requested to go out on loan in January. Which was blocked by Ole for squad cover reasons.
We still have not seen him.
Shoretire is given a token appearance so I have nothing to say here.
It genuinely pains me to see the Tuanzebe situation now. Who knows, he could be the fast CB we have been dying for. But we will never know as Ole doesn't trust him enough. I won't be surprised to see him leaving for another Premiership club and doing well there. I really think he is good enough.
But perhaps I cannot put too much blame on Ole.
The modern manager has to worry about their job first as a poor run of results can see them sacked. And job security first, youth second is increasingly the more common choice.
I hope once he signs his contract and he knows his job is safe, we will start to see some academy youth on the field again.
Otherwise, we will see more Angel Gomes style movements away for opportunities.
I loved Tuanzebe aggression, pace and position but he lacks playtime. Ole won't give much playtime for him since he loves so much Lindelof and Maguire combo that lacks pace.
The only good the combo is Lindelof long pass is somewhat good that can create chances from behind, for me remind of Daley Blind. If United not getting any CDM, I do think Lindelof is a desperate option can be CDM
Maguire can do monument at CB, no one can replace his place he is Ole favourite unless he is injured or a red card.