There’s no such thing as bad publicity. If you’re a sales person you should know this.

We gave him real advise, blackmambo was overly biased. The advise most of us have him is to stand his ground until the AMDK contact him to remove the strike. Which the AMDK did but didn’t expect TS to demand formal apology pula. So now TS should really just call it a day.

not really

lol?? please lah.. TS done nothing wrong. He obviously wanted his artwork removed from this youtuber because of whatever reasons.. Probably just doesn't like the neckbeard..

Infact, TS been teaching the neckbeard important lessons such as developing his own policy on asking for permission before using other peoples material..

The neckbeard fully deserves the copyright strike. He infringed on TS, and now he doesn't want to own up to his mistake?

A crime is a crime.. The police ain't going to be as lenient as you think..

This post has been edited by Liamness: Sep 22 2020, 11:11 AM

Yup.

This post has been edited by mac60931: Sep 22 2020, 11:10 AM

TS you request is very reasonable.

Let just go thru the possible situation/action that is going to happen, there is no need to go in detail/debating on fair use/DMCA/copyright etc. yet

In order for the youtuber to remove the copyright strike,

1) Wait for 90 days. If u dont follow the claim with lawsuit, the strike will expired after 90 days. Since u not going to for any lawsuit, so just let strike expired by itself.

2) You retract the claim. Since u already said if he make a formal apology and you will retract, which i think is fair. But looking at his latest tweet saying blackmail then i guess is not going to happen. So u just stick to option 1 above let it strike expired by itself.

I would say that u do not need to contact him at all if you going for option 1. If there is contact, use email for proper black and white. Even any of his party email u, u can take your own sweet time to reply them one week later (youtuber can say inbox spammed didnt see, u can say u are busy). Most important do not take any/ask any money from him for settlement, even if he offered. This will just look bad on u.

3) Youtuber contest the claim. If he want the strike to remove faster he will need to contest it with youtube. So he have to make an appeal to youtube, which i believe then youtube will link/inform u of youtuber intention. His party most probably will contact u by email on watever "lawsuit" he claim. Do not worry, he can sent u LoD, court notice etc. as long as the court notice is not by malaysia court u can ignore it.

For him to sue u, he need to come up with a case, so what he going to sue u for ? the drawing he used in the video is indeed your artwork, so there is no false claim here. He cant sue u saying u use a gundam another party IP in the drawing (that is for bandai to sue u, which i am pretty sure they wont). He cant sue you for getting the strike because that is by youtube. To me there is no case here, even if he somehow cook up a case, the money that need to spend to sue someone in malaysia by no mean small. Even big company are unwilling to do oversea court case unless the gain for winning the case is so big. So if youtuber somehow win the court case in malaysia, u will just need to retract you claim from youtube immediately only. Lastly the the time needed to cook up a case and bring it all the way to malaysia court, definitely gonna take more than the 90 days expiry period.

My conclusion, TS u can just ignore him, let him suck thumb for 90 days wait for the strike to expired

but this one is a fanart artist only.. no original art what.. why the hell so cocky..

if artist like Chang Fee Ming, Khalil Ibrahim, Redza Piyadasa or Yusof Ghani ok la.. but none of this masterpieces artist ego like this

Yup. Popcorn materials.

you're conflating two different things here.

"Fair use is a doctrine in the law of the United States that permits limited use of copyrighted material without having to first acquire permission from the copyright holder"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use

the second part you quote is about the creation of fan art; jeremy's part only concerns your first quote.

This post has been edited by cyhborg: Sep 22 2020, 11:14 AM

AMDK sure taste good didn’t?

it's freaking good..

teach that AMDK not to mess with malaysians.

How do you explain this then?

this lel.

from this tered...
macam alot white arse jilater jer...

"In the U.S., works of commentary, criticism, research, teaching, or news reporting might be considered fair use, but it can depend on the situation."

the youtuber can use above as defence

if the so called commentary criticism or news reporting is done in regards of the art itself. which the youtuber clearly did not.

Yup. Even if Jeremy wins the case in Malaysia, All ts need to do is retract the youtube claim back. Worth it? Don't know but it sure is my popcorn materials.

You do know ts is from MALAYSIA right?

i thought he was commenting on pokimane drama? hence the inclusion of the image? i didn't see the video so i don't know the details

why we cannot brigade and attack the youtuber

cause more drama

N give him more money from video view?
Not interesting


This post has been edited by lahart: Sep 22 2020, 11:24 AM