Typical snowflake sjw who thinks the world owes youtubers a living. Just like any other jobs if it’s your source of income it is YOUR RESPONSIBILITY to take care of your own fucking ricebowl. That includes not doing anything that could risk people striking your video.

You did something wrong then it’s you need to face the consequences not cry like a baby when things go south and play victim saying this person should have contacted me first instead of reporting me. Heck, u must be a beta cuck, if someone breaks into your house you also invite him to have coffee first and ask him to leave nicely right? Coz reporting him to the cops would ruin his livelihood.

Learn to look at the root cause of things not at people’s reactions. You sound like a bitch who did something wrong then when people retaliate seek sympathy by saying that was too harsh. Boo hoo, the world is a harsh place.

I guess based on your logic if someone tried to rape a girl and only manage to put it the tip of his dick then it’s not rape coz there’s no full on penetration huh? It’s just 2 seconds of the dick on the outer layers of the vagina, so let’s just let it go.

Oi cibai, when you run a YouTube channel you’re responsible for the content and anything your member of staff do.

Again TS did not risk destroying the YouTuber career, it’s the YouTuber who did that to himself for not taking control and accounts for the content he posted. Learn to take some self responsibility instead of blaming others for one’s own screwups.

Giving leeway is a courtesy not a right. Again no one owes youtubers a living.

Heck, based on this mentality you must be a najib supporter, he makes a living by songlapping, people should give him the chance to return the money he songlap instead of reporting him and putting him on trial. Now his whole livelihood is ruined. TOPKEK!

Again, perhaps it’s time you youtubers stop being whiny snowflakes and learn to be responsible for your own actions.

Coming from someone who started the rambling and giving their own analogy it’s funny how suddenly you just wanna focus on real substantial arguments. Guess you’re really one of those snowflakes who thinks if I do it it’s ok but it’s not ok for others to do it. Calm ur entitled tits aite.

On the legal ramifications, if the AMDK has any grounds to sue TS he would have done it already. The reason he went and posted a video to scare TS and get his followers to bully him is because the YouTuber himself also knows he doesn’t have any grounds to sue TS. Vice versa TS doesn’t have any grounds to claim his artwork. End of the day both of them got no grounds for shit. Plus now with the video he posted and with his followers harassing TS. TS can easily get the guy banned for good for bullying like what happened to leafy.

How many screwups or oopsie does it take to lose your income? Depending on the situation even one is enough. If you breach something written in your contract for example, that one oopsie is enough. Now when YouTubers signed up with YouTube they agreed to YouTube’s terms and conditions. It’s the same thing. Now even if the first instance the TS did not have the right to claim copyright, the reaction from the YouTuber to create a video about it to bully TS is clearly against YouTube’s terms and conditions. So he’s digging a bigger hole for himself, guess he’s gonna play victim also if YouTube bans him for bullying/harassment.

I already said both of them got no case, plus Thequartering was the one who said he will file a court case. TS didn’t. So now TS copyright strike, he dispute it, I don’t think TS should raise a court case for the copyright. If TS smart he can just report the new video for bullying and harassment and get that fella banned.

Then there’s nothing for him to worry about then since he got protection. Though I’m pretty sure that’s exactly what leafy thought before he got banned.

Dude you don’t remember what you posted? Like a slap vs a stab or something along those lines among others.

Then go ahead and sue him. I mean I’m sure if he made a video with LOD it would be an even bigger drama, even more for him to milk. He has no grounds whatsoever, video got taken down as part of YouTube process, he can dispute it and get it reinstated. What grounds does he have to sue TS? He gonna sue TS for YouTube’s process? On the part about false flagging, if it really is considered as false flagging (when it comes to fan art it’s a big grey area still) the one who can take action against TS is youtube not the AMDK.

I love how one sided you are on this, calling out what TS did as shitty and worshipping the AMDK like he is a god. Didn’t it cross your mind that after TS strike him, he could have contacted TS, apologise for using his fanart without asking first and get TS to remove the strike, but no, he went down the route of threatening and bullying. But I guess it’s alright for him to do it right since he is a YouTuber right?

He hasn’t taken it to court so what exactly will it be too late for?

As below if inaction then it will expire so...what grounds again will he sue TS for?

Then go ahead and SUE TS. It’s not gonna be an easy case for either side since it involves fanart.

Creativity is stunted? Dude no one is stopping YouTubers from creating their content, just that basic common sense if you wanna use someone else’s stuff to create content ask for permission. They sendiri didn’t bother to ask for permission then now it’s not their fault pula. What fucking logic is this???

If only you’d do the same and ask the YouTuber to contact TS and bincang nicely to get him to retract. I find the bias dumbfounding

What the fuck man, why is the onus on TS to contact the YouTuber instead of the other way around? The YouTuber is the one using TS fanart.

The YouTuber is a cunt for not asking permission then after TS strike him the YouTuber reaction was to post a video to bully TS, if he really cared about his career why can’t he contact TS after TS strike him and ask TS nicely to retract? Seriously bro your logic is fucking WOW!

So your logic is, because TS strike YouTuber that gives him a free pass to do whatever the fuck he wants? Then if he does get banned let’s say not for copyright la but for clout bullying, still TS fault because TS striked him?

Seriously learn to take some fucking ownership. This all started from the YouTuber action. TS reaction was a bit drastic but then The YouTubers response was worse. Already salah, then people report, instead of apologising nicely, he choose to threaten and bully. But yeah, always sarahan orang lain, typical snowflake sjw mentality.

I’m wondering why the YouTuber can’t contact TS instead? I mean, he was the one who used TS fanart not the other way around. Because he is AMDK he cannot initiate contact first? Or because he is a famous youtuber?

Dear TS, I think this is enough. No reason to drag this further la. Technically he already reach out to you via itsagundam to ask you to remove the strike. So just end things here.

There’s no such thing as bad publicity. If you’re a sales person you should know this.

We gave him real advise, blackmambo was overly biased. The advise most of us have him is to stand his ground until the AMDK contact him to remove the strike. Which the AMDK did but didn’t expect TS to demand formal apology pula. So now TS should really just call it a day.

The court will review everything before they determine who is right. Based on the latest video from TQ seems like the “extortion” is TS demanding for a formal apology. Now it would depend if the court would consider that TQ lose his potential income due to TS or due to his own actions.

TQ would argue that he lost potential income due to TS striking his video, but then again TQ posted a video in response to the strike instead of reaching out to TS to clear the air. Also his so called “email” if it’s real shows no remorse and was an arrogant email which says either you choose these 2 options or we go to court. Lastly his video clearly shows that TQ doesn’t want to apologise to TS. So end of the day depends if the court would consider the loss of income is due to TS or TQ own reactions to the strike.

One thing for sure TQ did not want to nego nicely. I mean look at the content of the so called email. He was basically bashing TS and saying follow my terms or face me in court.

Please lah, there is a difference between straight to the point and being rude even if it’s for American. The content of his email clearly was bashing TS first then tell TS choose option1, 2 or go to court which is basically a threat. Been working in American companies for most of my career and this ain’t a straightforward direct email.