QUOTE(icemanfx @ Jul 26 2020, 12:59 AM)
Although there are enough legislation to charge marked up loan borrower for loan fraud. however, local bank is more keen to recover debts and police commercial crime division don't normally get involve in debts recovery. given rising npl from marked up loan, it won't be a surprise some will be charged for loan fraud to deter future offence, especially those marked up for huge cash back.
There is a BIG different between marked-up price for loan purpose and marked-up price for supply of services/products.
The former is 'executed' through the loan agreement where 'REPAYMENT IS MANDATORY'. Upon settlement of the loan, banks have collected back the principal disbursed plus interest. There is NO loss to the bank. There is NO fraud.
Again, I repeat ... default by borrower is lain cerita .
The latter is 'executed' through a price increase for the supply of services/products. Suppliers dont benefit from the price increase. Less services/products are being supplied for the same amount of money paid. There is a
LOSS to the company that have paid a higher price for the services/products. The person who received the 'marked-up' is NOT OBLIGATED' to repay the money received. THIS IS FRAUD !
The forner is 'legal' and the latter is ILLEGAL !
It NOT a surprised that NON will be charged for 'loan fraud' which is 'illegal' made legal between banks and borrowers through a LEGAL STAMPED LOAN AGREEMENT !
Banks are 'illegal' Ah Long made legal by BNM through issuance of banking licences while Ah Long are 'illegal' made illegal due to non compliance requirements ! Nevertheless, both are money lenders !
If marked-up is bank compliance, how is it a fraud ?
This post has been edited by mini orchard: Jul 26 2020, 04:55 AM