The most important is: Bufferbloat.
ISP that have Anti Bufferbloat is TIME and Viewqwest Malaysia.

Unifi to Telekom Malaysia speed test server: ~7ms
Viewqwest to Telekom Malaysia speed test server: ~5ms


Having no 0ms Bufferbloat is heaven, you can run Download or Upload all the time but latency not effected!

you got trace route result from viewqwest malaysia? is it viewqwest own fibre area or viewqwest TM HSBB area? as i know maxis fibre TM HSBB area has almost double ping to sgp-1.valve.net compare to unifi fibre.

I went to Customer House for some IT services at Setia Eco Glades (2.937678, 101.633800)
I didn't run Trace Route, I run many Speed Test, Viewqwest is the lowest ping I ever encountered for Home,

IP: 103.232.29.4
8ms to StarHub Mobile Pte Ltd (SG)
9ms to Viewqwest Pte Ltd (SG)
5ms to Telekom Malaysia Berhad (MY)
4ms to IP Core Sdn Bhd (MY)
9ms to Maxis (MY)

and get A+ for Bufferbloat at http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest
Viewqwest Network very clean, what they claim is true!

I went to Customer House for some IT services at Setia Eco Glades (2.937678, 101.633800)
I didn't run Trace Route, I run many Speed Test, Viewqwest is the lowest ping I ever encountered for Home,

IP: 103.232.29.4
8ms to StarHub Mobile Pte Ltd (SG)
9ms to Viewqwest Pte Ltd (SG)
5ms to Telekom Malaysia Berhad (MY)
4ms to IP Core Sdn Bhd (MY)
9ms to Maxis (MY)

and get A+ for Bufferbloat at http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest
Viewqwest Network very clean, what they claim is true!

Sabah and Sarawak users get 30~50ms on unifi. So how did you compare?

The most important is: Bufferbloat.
ISP that have Anti Bufferbloat is TIME and Viewqwest Malaysia.

Unifi to Telekom Malaysia speed test server: ~7ms
Viewqwest to Telekom Malaysia speed test server: ~5ms


Having no 0ms Bufferbloat is heaven, you can run Download or Upload all the time but latency not effected!

And when you mention that TIME and Viewqwest is anti bufferbloat - can i assume you're referring to the device still or some other setup within their network?

I got this
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/64878335
don't know is it okay or not.

TIME and Viewquest dont have speed cap at ONT side (Hardware defined), the speed cap happen at PPPoE or Account (Software defined).
This is how TM making Maxis Fiber looks bad, cap on ONT cause Router received more buffer, more latency.

TNB Allo and Celcom Timur Sabah networks also doesn't practice bufferfloat. Accounts are capped acordingly leaving full speed on each subscriber's ONT.

Really stupid TM decision, they only making their network more inefficient and slower.

That looks really impressive! I've quite a bit worse than yours: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/64859238

Bufferbloat is a massive big D

Consistent performance and no ping spike.

Good routing is a huge plus. I notice TIME have a better routing to SG Steam server than TM.

How do you see whether TIME or TM has better routing etc.?

My PSN connection quite unstable - but that maybe my poor wifi coverage towards the wifi router   

TIME and Viewquest dont have speed cap at ONT side (Hardware defined), the speed cap happen at PPPoE or Account (Software defined).
This is how TM making Maxis Fiber looks bad, cap on ONT cause Router received more buffer, more latency.

I don't think Unifi is capped speed base on ONT, my Unifi upgrade from 30mbps -> 50mbps -> 500mbps. Last time during 30mbps, TM capped my speed to 27mbps only. After they offer 50mbps free upgrade, my speed can get 52mbps but they never come to my home to replace new ONT. Later that, TM free upgrade my Unifi to 500mbps again, I just need to restart my ONT to get 500mbps. No technicians come to replace my ONT, still remain the same old ONT.

ONT can be configured and provision by OLT to enforce speed limit, for Unifi User on Unifi Network seen has no speed limit, the speed limit was on Account, that's is why you get extra speed, software defined is not hard as Hardware Level.

because of this, TM can exactly speed cap on other competitors riding on Unifi Network.

ONT speed limit is like physical link speed, so can't get real speed since TCP/IP Overhead!

Way Unifi Provisioning Maxis for example, they cap exactly 300mbps (Internet + VoIP + Management), this very reason when having heavy traffic, VoIP calls can't get through.

during MCO, my VoIP have issue, Maxis login into my Router and they can't get in, so I need stop internet for a while.

I trying to hack Unifi ONT via TTL to RS232, it can be done, just need time to find out.

True, Maxis and the other ISPs riding on TM Wholesale HSBB should bring this up and sue TM Wholesale for this double level capping(bufferfloat) making competitors look bad.

On the account side already capped accordingly, why must cap the ONT as well and make it exactly the same speed as the soft side? (Example cap the ONT exactly at 30M, 50M, 100M, 300M,500M..etc).

That way the customer will always made to absorb the extra TCP/IP overhead getting less.
(Example subscribe 30M only get 28M max, 100M get only 95M, etc.)

They do this on their competitors but they don't do it on their own ISP? That is DOUBLE standard!

It's time Maxis, DiGi and even Celcom who ride on the HSBB network to sue TM for this anti-competition dirty move.

ONT can be configured and provision by OLT to enforce speed limit, for Unifi User on Unifi Network seen has no speed limit, the speed limit was on Account, that's is why you get extra speed, software defined is not hard as Hardware Level.

because of this, TM can exactly speed cap on other competitors riding on Unifi Network.

ONT speed limit is like physical link speed, so can't get real speed since TCP/IP Overhead!

Way Unifi Provisioning Maxis for example, they cap exactly 300mbps (Internet + VoIP + Management), this very reason when having heavy traffic, VoIP calls can't get through.

during MCO, my VoIP have issue, Maxis login into my Router and they can't get in, so I need stop internet for a while.

I trying to hack Unifi ONT via TTL to RS232, it can be done, just need time to find out.

unifi installation around 2 years ago, the installer cut the fibre and connect the fibre connector by hand, without install Fibre Wall Socket, there's no Soft Yellow Fibre Cable, Black Fibre Cable Straight into FIBERHOME ONU, it's still working today, without any issue.

unifi installation last month, at the same taman, before connect the Fibre Cable to the Distribution Point On TM Pole, unifi installer Fusion splicing the Fibre Cable with a Factory Packaged few Meter Fibre Cable with Fibre Connector Pre-installed, after pulling the Fibre Cable to the Destination, unifi installer Fusion splicing again the Fibre Cable with a Factory Packaged few Meter Fibre Cable with Fibre Connector Pre-installed, both cable are Black, have Steel wire Support, without install Fibre Wall Socket, there's no Soft Yellow Fibre Cable, Black Fibre Cable Straight into Huawei HG8240H5 claim to be Universal ONU Fibre modem, while the whole city unifi and other HSBB Provider was using FIBERHOME ONU. same taman few months ago new unifi installation still receive FIBERHOME ONU, just the new unifi branding at the plastic cover instead of older TM branding. this taman still has plenty of port left during 1st installation of unifi Distribution Point, not yet receive 2nd installation of unifi Distribution Point, while some other area of this city has receive it recently some months ago.

unifi installer write down unifi fibre port password, unifi username, unifi password, unifi phone number, unifi phone number password at the fibre modem box.

Huawei HG8240H5 can login with Default Username Password, Web GUI still Enabled.

at the same city, just saw a maxis fibre 30Mbps customer at Shop Lot Biz Area with Huawei HG8240H ONU Fibre modem that has TM Logo. he claim install it around Years ago.



https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/ma...odem-1072796903

there is at least 2 case i have seen with my own eye, that unifi installation at different Shop Lot Biz Area, Black fibre cable was coming from front Entrance through wall, but before the fibre cable through the wall, there's 2 fibre cable Connector to connect both fibre cable, i would provide the photo later if i found it.

Photo Uploaded
[attachmentid=10343807]

I do wonder - from an end user's perspective, does it matter so much that for e.g. this overhead may be reducing the "full" speed of the network?

I'm just questioning, because, generally, under most scenarios, whether downloading, or streaming stuffs - we generally can't utilize the full speed anyways, and often times, are hampered by the server side who most often times cannot deliver such performances also?

unifi home install at end of 2017 for unifi Bonanza RM139 30Mbps, FiberHome ONU, tested with other account confirmed that ONU was Capped at 100Mbps, SpeedTest 96Mbps. Receive 10x free speed upgrade at October 2018, Speedtest around 310Mbps, SpeedTest with other account would get abit more. recently, SpeedTest with both accounts would get same SpeedTest result, not abit more anymore. there is single port out of 1-65535 port open at the FiberHome ONU, but not sure when, all ports was closed out of 1-65535 port. unifi installer Didn't provide unifi fibre port password, unifi username, unifi password, unifi phone number, unifi phone number password.

unifi biz install at September 2019, right before 2019 free 3 Months 2 Years Contracts Year End Promo, did subscribe and received YEP after install, Huawei HG8240H5 Universal ONU, Modem Webpages can login with Default Admin and User Password, unifi installer even write down unifi fibre port password, unifi username, unifi password, unifi phone number, unifi phone number password at the fibre modem box. Huawei HG8240H5 Universal ONU is uncapped or maxcapped, confirmed by testing with other account.

remember that alot of, huge percentage of, but not every streamyx 1Mbps account is capped 1.5Mbps at account level?

About the bolded part, "same result not a bit more anymore".

The problem is other ISPs on TM HSBB such as Maxis is getting "LESS" even on telco's own speed test servers even on the lowest tiered plans.

30M plan you get max 28Mbps(6.7% loss)
100M plan you only get max 95Mbps(5% loss)

Should we get 6% and 5% discounts on our bill because of getting lesser than as advertised? Such low tiered plan is no excuse when doing in house speed servers considering fibre can provide speeds in excess of >2Gbps.

You want to sell best effort and no guarantee 1Gbps plans it's fine by me, but even 30M/100M plans you want to shortchange your customers?