QUOTE(Moogle Stiltzkin @ Jul 30 2022, 09:04 PM)
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/07/raz...nical-keyboard/bit pricey though. also is wireless keyboards secure? or is this gonna be a security issue for keyloggers to steal info wirelessly?
https://technoqia.com/are-wireless-keyboards-secure/https://www.sikich.com/insight/ahhh-my-mous...rd-were-hacked/https://www.crowe.com/cybersecurity-watch/w...s-explained-dgshowever i do like the fact they use
optical mechanical switches, i hope that trend continues
with regular rubber dome switches, they feel like *** typing on, and sometimes it even can accidentally actuate the wrong key even. and response is ****. So now with optical mechanical switches, probly most of those issues is no longer a concern. Any with the mechanical switches u have a variety like reds, browns, blues.... even the unpopular blacks, so there is a variation of actuation tastes tailored to your own preferences
fyi i'm a fan of mx browns, reds are nice but i worry because they are linear with no tactile feedback which is what i prefer.
about wireless security, i believe appropriate solutions are already in place. the key question is whether operating systems, and device manufacturers have implemented them accordingly or not. if either of them are not doing it right, it will not work imo.
i just stick to wired option.
as for optical mechanical switches, yes, they have eliminated debounce issues, with much longer shelf lives compared to mx style switches. however, there are reasons why they are not popular:
1. in real life, users don't feel the differences of the strengths of optical switches;
2. there is a general lack of choices;
3. optical sensors on pcb. optical switches need sensors to work. i believe such sensors have shelf lives, and replacement/repair might not be as simple as mx style switches. also, it's an additional cost to pcb makers.
although i like the advantages of optical switches, it needs more than those to be popular.
low-profile mechanical switches is another story. no one realized that mx style switches are popular because these clones were based on a standard, i.e. cherry mx switches. however, when it came to low-profile switches, every one made their own implementations, with different switch footprints. this breaks universal compatibility that is important to allow better user acceptance, and continuous growths in general. this is worse than romer-g.
This post has been edited by horns: Jul 30 2022, 10:52 PM