QUOTE(Hunakadoo @ May 26 2021, 11:19 AM)
ur point
1. photoshop
2. dev - can u-turn
what else i can say ?
let them buyer have the central park la , such a high dens land but no park , exsim isnt stupid lar . u guys jelly or what that park for sure open for public one ( it is not possible to closed for all D series residence usage )
He has a point you know..1. photoshop
2. dev - can u-turn
what else i can say ?
let them buyer have the central park la , such a high dens land but no park , exsim isnt stupid lar . u guys jelly or what that park for sure open for public one ( it is not possible to closed for all D series residence usage )
As I've mentioned... developer doesn't use their brand logo on artist impression... (see my post earlier)
it would have been done by property agent to desperately prove that these photos have ties to the developer...
also... developer changing master plan is very common.... I've already mentioned and showed evidence many times... that even an "official" master plan with blueprints can just be discarded if the developer decides to change their plan... but most of the time they don't commit anything...
when they promise a park... it is an "invitation to treat" (if you don't know basic law please google the terms ya?)...
Again... not saying the park definitely won't happen cause there are still other plots of land for development but my final thoughts are
1) The park won't be the last item to be developed in the land... since there are still a few plots for other development... it may be possible
2) If there is going to be a park.... it is not going to be like how it is depicted on the photos you've provided....the adventure park/waterfall/wet land etc. makes absolutely no sense for a public park... also the land behind behind as already mention in page 11-12 that gov will be leveling the area for low cost residential....
On the part about property agents getting the artist impression photos first.... I'm not an agent or a property expert.... but I do know that property agents normally uses the photos from the developers published site....
most of the time when they don't use official photos... it is most likely a "scam" or incorrect representation...
just go to property guru and you can see tons of unethical property agents using artist impression that is not related to the product or made up artist impression photos.... just search for PARK 2..... they uses Park 2 BJCC impression photos a product not even relating to Park 2.... basically to glorified a lower end project just so happen that it is situated in bukit jalil
This post has been edited by holypredator: May 26 2021, 11:45 AM
May 26 2021, 11:35 AM

Quote
0.0439sec
1.38
6 queries
GZIP Disabled