Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Boeing Mocked Lion Air B737 Max Simulator Request, Before Crash

views
     
TSazriel
post Jan 15 2020, 07:46 AM, updated 6y ago

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
Excerpts.

QUOTE
Boeing Mocked Lion Air For Requesting Extra 737 Max Pilot Training Year Before Crash

By Ryan Beene, Harry Suhartono, and Bloomberg

January 14, 2020

Indonesia’s Lion Air considered putting its pilots through simulator training before flying the Boeing Co. 737 Max but abandoned the idea after the planemaker convinced them in 2017 it was unnecessary, according to people familiar with the matter and internal company communications.

The next year, 189 people died when a Lion Air 737 Max plunged into the Java Sea, a disaster blamed in part on inadequate training and the crew’s unfamiliarity with a new flight-control feature on the Max that malfunctioned.


QUOTE
Boeing employees had expressed alarm among themselves over the possibility that one of the company’s largest customers might require its pilots to undergo costly simulator training before flying the new 737 model, according to internal messages that have been released to the media. Those messages, included in the more than 100 pages of internal Boeing communications that the company provided to lawmakers and the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration and released widely on Thursday, had Lion Air’s name redacted.

But the House committee provided excerpts of those messages to Bloomberg News that un-redacted the Indonesian carrier’s name.

“Now friggin Lion Air might need a sim to fly the MAX, and maybe because of their own stupidity. I’m scrambling trying to figure out how to unscrew this now! idiots,” one Boeing employee wrote in June 2017 text messages obtained by the company and released by the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee.

In response, a Boeing colleague replied: “WHAT THE F%$&!!!! But their sister airline is already flying it!” That was an apparent reference to Malindo Air, the Malaysian-based carrier that was the first to fly the Max commercially.


Full article: https://fortune.com/2020/01/14/boeing-lion-...imulator-crash/




arc_archive
post Jan 15 2020, 08:01 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
386 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Luo Yang



0168257061
post Jan 15 2020, 08:04 AM

EimiFukada
********
All Stars
14,242 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: JAVABUS


Lion Air had initially raised concerns about the need for simulator training on the Max but ultimately accepted Boeing’s recommendation that it was unnecessary.
JoeK
post Jan 15 2020, 08:06 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,099 posts

Joined: Jan 2019
How can they say these vulgarity in emails?

So not professional hmm.gif
SUSMPPJ
post Jan 15 2020, 08:22 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
5 posts

Joined: Jan 2019
Ini semua sarahan malindo
homicidal85
post Jan 15 2020, 08:53 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
295 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: JB


QUOTE(JoeK @ Jan 15 2020, 08:06 AM)
How can they say these vulgarity in emails?

So not professional hmm.gif
*
wowww... when something bad happens. all fukin emails come out. better stay professional. looks like private email from one employee to his co-worker. i doubt this was circulated to more employees. Boeing IT guys probably just pulled all references to lion air in their server from start of order date to crash date and they got private email communications as well.
s@ni
post Jan 15 2020, 08:57 AM

Gambar Di Lesen Kereta Saya
*******
Senior Member
2,842 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Seasaw



QUOTE(0168257061 @ Jan 15 2020, 08:04 AM)
Lion Air had initially raised concerns about the need for simulator training on the Max but ultimately accepted Boeing’s recommendation that it was unnecessary.
*
sudah jaga bontot.. ok lah tu
desmond2020
post Jan 15 2020, 09:02 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
906 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


Lulz

The person who wrote that email is now officially dumbest man on earth now



kkboy
post Jan 15 2020, 09:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
113 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
Looks like i wont be booking Malindo air anymore lol
macyhouse
post Jan 15 2020, 09:09 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
QUOTE(JoeK @ Jan 15 2020, 08:06 AM)
How can they say these vulgarity in emails?

So not professional hmm.gif
*
QUOTE(homicidal85 @ Jan 15 2020, 08:53 AM)
wowww... when something bad happens. all fukin emails come out. better stay professional. looks like private email from one employee to his co-worker. i doubt this was circulated to more employees. Boeing IT guys probably just pulled all references to lion air in their server from start of order date to crash date and they got private email communications as well.
*
one Boeing employee wrote in June 2017 text messages

* text msg so probably it’s old windows messenger lync

This post has been edited by macyhouse: Jan 15 2020, 09:11 AM
fabianz03
post Jan 15 2020, 09:14 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,649 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Tāmaki Makaurau
Don’t be surprised that many many many internal emails between employees are written that way. That’s why once it leaks it’s always very juicy due to the language and context involved


Edit: also, fuck you Boeing you piece of shit

This post has been edited by fabianz03: Jan 15 2020, 09:15 AM
pakmulau
post Jan 15 2020, 09:14 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
589 posts

Joined: Mar 2016
memang bungkus la boeing ni

kalau boeing ni bukan US company lama dah bankrap
RobUlstan
post Jan 15 2020, 09:15 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
QUOTE(homicidal85 @ Jan 15 2020, 08:53 AM)
wowww... when something bad happens. all fukin emails come out. better stay professional. looks like private email from one employee to his co-worker. i doubt this was circulated to more employees. Boeing IT guys probably just pulled all references to lion air in their server from start of order date to crash date and they got private email communications as well.
*
You use company email or company resources i.e. phones, pcs, etc. then it's not private.
CeDhhVss
post Jan 15 2020, 09:17 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
92 posts

Joined: Jun 2012
From: hurr-durr


crazy
pakmulau
post Jan 15 2020, 09:18 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
589 posts

Joined: Mar 2016
QUOTE(azriel @ Jan 15 2020, 07:46 AM)
In response, a Boeing colleague replied: “WHAT THE F%$&!!!! But their sister airline is already flying it!” That was an apparent reference to Malindo Air, the Malaysian-based carrier that was the first to fly the Max commercially.

Betul ka Malindo pakao Max Series rclxub.gif rclxub.gif rclxub.gif

i tot they flying 737 model biasa
0168257061
post Jan 15 2020, 09:20 AM

EimiFukada
********
All Stars
14,242 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: JAVABUS


QUOTE(pakmulau @ Jan 15 2020, 09:18 AM)
In response, a Boeing colleague replied: “WHAT THE F%$&!!!! But their sister airline is already flying it!” That was an apparent reference to Malindo Air, the Malaysian-based carrier that was the first to fly the Max commercially.

Betul ka Malindo pakao Max Series  rclxub.gif  rclxub.gif  rclxub.gif

i tot they flying 737 model biasa
*
OD used 737MAX for a few flights before handing to JT

user posted image
pakmulau
post Jan 15 2020, 09:26 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
589 posts

Joined: Mar 2016
QUOTE(0168257061 @ Jan 15 2020, 09:20 AM)
OD used 737MAX for a few flights before handing to JT

user posted image
*
wahhh so lucky cry.gif cry.gif cry.gif maybe me also pernah naik max with malindo

did malindo use Max for KUL - BKI route?

i can't recognized which one Max or old model
0168257061
post Jan 15 2020, 09:35 AM

EimiFukada
********
All Stars
14,242 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: JAVABUS


QUOTE(pakmulau @ Jan 15 2020, 09:26 AM)
wahhh so lucky  cry.gif  cry.gif  cry.gif  maybe me also pernah naik max with malindo

did malindo use Max for KUL - BKI route?

i can't recognized which one Max or old model
*
My flightradar subscription doesn't allow me to retrieve more than 90 days.

It used to be KUL, SIN, BKI, TSN (Charter) and some other charter routes in China that I can't recall back.
pakmulau
post Jan 15 2020, 09:42 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
589 posts

Joined: Mar 2016
QUOTE(0168257061 @ Jan 15 2020, 09:35 AM)
My flightradar subscription doesn't allow me to retrieve more than 90 days.

It used to be KUL, SIN, BKI, TSN (Charter) and some other charter routes in China that I can't recall back.
*
i alway fly MAS for BKI-KUL

malindo is second choice when MAS ticket a bit expensive for me

maybe malindo use max for their SEA route only
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 15 2020, 09:45 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


Simple case of right hand don't talk to left hand, and then put the blame on vendor. Standard attitude in the end of service line companies.
blackpink
post Jan 15 2020, 09:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(pakmulau @ Jan 15 2020, 09:26 AM)
wahhh so lucky  cry.gif  cry.gif  cry.gif  maybe me also pernah naik max with malindo

did malindo use Max for KUL - BKI route?

i can't recognized which one Max or old model
*
brows.gif
kitzai
post Jan 15 2020, 09:55 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
172 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
QUOTE(0168257061 @ Jan 15 2020, 09:20 AM)
OD used 737MAX for a few flights before handing to JT

user posted image
*
But now all MAX are grounded right ?
RicoT
post Jan 15 2020, 09:56 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
200 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
No wonder Lion Air is so furious, then came another crash, Boeing can say it is as good as dead now. 737MAX grounded with no expected date of return, 737NG facing pitch fork crack issues.
pakmulau
post Jan 15 2020, 09:58 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
589 posts

Joined: Mar 2016
QUOTE(kitzai @ Jan 15 2020, 09:55 AM)
But now all MAX are grounded right ?
*
yeah after Ethiopian boeing crash all Malaysia operator MAS, Malindo and Airasia said they have no Max in their operation
darosha
post Jan 15 2020, 09:59 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
469 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: UM, KL, PJ, 14


oh so malindo fly max?
nope no more malindo for me ever
Matchy
post Jan 15 2020, 10:02 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,321 posts

Joined: Jun 2019


QUOTE(JoeK @ Jan 15 2020, 08:06 AM)
How can they say these vulgarity in emails?

So not professional hmm.gif
*
QUOTE(macyhouse @ Jan 15 2020, 09:09 AM)
one Boeing employee wrote in June 2017 text messages

* text msg so probably it’s old windows messenger lync
*
I think text message = SMS.
death_nite
post Jan 15 2020, 10:03 AM

Lossless Land...
*******
Senior Member
2,366 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Not Here Not There...


I really2 wanna see boeing went bankrupt. Their staff is so arrogant. If i am the owner of Lion air i wont bother to deal with boeing anymore. Senyap2 curse us like that.

Those people shouldnt be allow to live anymore. 300 lives dead because of these incompetent guys.
0168257061
post Jan 15 2020, 10:03 AM

EimiFukada
********
All Stars
14,242 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: JAVABUS


QUOTE(RicoT @ Jan 15 2020, 09:56 AM)
No wonder Lion Air is so furious, then came another crash, Boeing can say it is as good as dead now. 737MAX grounded with no expected date of return, 737NG facing pitch fork crack issues.
*
Karma hits back to those ameriCUNTS.
They lose their jobs because production halt. Less job opportunity.
cloud666
post Jan 15 2020, 10:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
79 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
should grounded all boeing model before safety rechecked
like us banning huawei in all range
Phoenix_KL
post Jan 15 2020, 10:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
156 posts

Joined: Sep 2017
QUOTE(arc_archive @ Jan 15 2020, 08:01 AM)

*
indonesia so many micro earthquakes. whistling.gif
pakmulau
post Jan 15 2020, 10:07 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
589 posts

Joined: Mar 2016
QUOTE(blackpink @ Jan 15 2020, 09:50 AM)
brows.gif
*
now i always have this kind of anxiety every times flight thru the cloud and shaking cry.gif cry.gif cry.gif

develop this feeling after this Max crash la

always imagine pilot lost control of flight la computers system gone haywire la cry.gif cry.gif cry.gif

dulu2 steady always sleep till landing


Phoenix_KL
post Jan 15 2020, 10:09 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
156 posts

Joined: Sep 2017
QUOTE(RobUlstan @ Jan 15 2020, 09:15 AM)
You use company email or company resources i.e. phones, pcs, etc. then it's not private.
*
najib not private too. laugh.gif
ryedrift
post Jan 15 2020, 10:11 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
68 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: dimana-manakah?


you see the simulation video the flight plunged into the sea, damn scary liao
SUSzerozero00
post Jan 15 2020, 10:13 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Oct 2019
Boeing is a murderer.
0168257061
post Jan 15 2020, 10:14 AM

EimiFukada
********
All Stars
14,242 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: JAVABUS


QUOTE(cloud666 @ Jan 15 2020, 10:04 AM)
should grounded all boeing model before safety rechecked
like us banning huawei in all range
*
If you ban Boeing from flying it means you are declaring war with the US.


RobUlstan
post Jan 15 2020, 10:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 09:45 AM)
Simple case of right hand don't talk to left hand, and then put the blame on vendor. Standard attitude in the end of service line companies.
*
What do you mean? In this case, by all indications, IT IS the fault of the vendor.
blackpink
post Jan 15 2020, 10:19 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(pakmulau @ Jan 15 2020, 10:07 AM)
now i always have this kind of anxiety every times flight thru the cloud and shaking  cry.gif  cry.gif  cry.gif

develop this feeling after this Max crash la

always imagine pilot lost control of flight la computers system gone haywire la  cry.gif  cry.gif  cry.gif

dulu2 steady always sleep till landing
*
u boy or girl?
ApocalypseSoon
post Jan 15 2020, 10:22 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
214 posts

Joined: Jan 2019
Boeing 737 Max:
Designed by Clown, Certified by Monkey
Airbus officer called it as Mad Max



This post has been edited by ApocalypseSoon: Jan 15 2020, 10:23 AM
cloud666
post Jan 15 2020, 10:23 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
79 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(0168257061 @ Jan 15 2020, 10:14 AM)
If you ban Boeing from flying it means you are declaring war with the US.
*
how is that so?
so is US seeing profit > human life openly to the world? (even we know they did)
if thats the case, more like US declaring war to the world
drowning
post Jan 15 2020, 10:25 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
86 posts

Joined: Mar 2013


QUOTE(azriel @ Jan 15 2020, 07:46 AM)
Hahaha how to unscrew? End up Boeing themselves is screwed! Unscrew this bitch!!
macyhouse
post Jan 15 2020, 10:32 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
QUOTE(Matchy @ Jan 15 2020, 10:02 AM)
I think text message = SMS.
*
from company server ma
limeuu
post Jan 15 2020, 10:56 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,290 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(kkboy @ Jan 15 2020, 09:04 AM)
Looks like i wont be booking Malindo air anymore lol
*
Malindo are not flying the max.....all maxs worldwide are grounded....they use the 737ng which is extremely safe...
Which is why this disaster happens.... Boeing wants to ride on the familiar safe ng to sell the max....rather than design a brand new aircraft....
limeuu
post Jan 15 2020, 11:01 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,290 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


https://qz.com/1776080/how-the-mcdonnell-do...737-max-crisis/

This helps explain why....

When businessman and non technical people take over....
pakmulau
post Jan 15 2020, 01:11 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
589 posts

Joined: Mar 2016
QUOTE(blackpink @ Jan 15 2020, 10:19 AM)
u boy or girl?
*
boboiboy la hahaha
rooney723
post Jan 15 2020, 01:16 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
596 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
QUOTE(JoeK @ Jan 15 2020, 08:06 AM)
How can they say these vulgarity in emails?

So not professional hmm.gif
*
last time when sony pictures got hacked also the same la, their emails all got vulgarities n call who dumb la etc
blackpink
post Jan 15 2020, 02:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(pakmulau @ Jan 15 2020, 01:11 PM)
boboiboy la hahaha
*
brows.gif
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 15 2020, 04:00 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(RobUlstan @ Jan 15 2020, 10:16 AM)
What do you mean? In this case, by all indications, IT IS the fault of the vendor.
*
The new flight controls malfunctioned, is it through manufacturing problem or maintenance problem? Would additional training have helped in control failure situation? Why can't Lion Air get knowledge transfer from Malindo Air, which was already flying the Max?

So many questions, so few answers, but as typical in the court of public opinion, the one who was rude is the guilty party.
ohman
post Jan 15 2020, 04:01 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,178 posts

Joined: Aug 2014
QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 04:00 PM)
The new flight controls malfunctioned, is it through manufacturing problem or maintenance problem? Would additional training have helped in control failure situation? Why can't Lion Air get knowledge transfer from Malindo Air, which was already flying the Max?

So many questions, so few answers, but as typical in the court of public opinion, the one who was rude is the guilty party.
*
What makes you think malindo air knew about this?


Nobody knew.


They talked about malindo because malindo accepted and were flying the plane while lion air rejected and wanted a training prior to accepting it.


MAGAMan-X
post Jan 15 2020, 04:03 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(ohman @ Jan 15 2020, 04:01 PM)
What makes you think malindo air knew about this?
Nobody knew.
They talked about malindo because malindo accepted and were flying the plane while lion air rejected and wanted a training prior to accepting it.
*
Again... Seems like a left/right hand thing.
ohman
post Jan 15 2020, 04:05 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,178 posts

Joined: Aug 2014
QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 04:03 PM)
Again... Seems like a left/right hand thing.
*
brows.gif


Let me try my other hand

brows.gif
Chanwsan
post Jan 15 2020, 04:14 PM

सोहम
******
Senior Member
1,406 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Living Hell


Wow so professional messages. Makes me wonder if I had been doing things wrong
DValentine
post Jan 15 2020, 04:49 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
773 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
From: isudahinsap.flac


QUOTE(RicoT @ Jan 15 2020, 09:56 AM)
No wonder Lion Air is so furious, then came another crash, Boeing can say it is as good as dead now. 737MAX grounded with no expected date of return, 737NG facing pitch fork crack issues.
*
top three order weii lion air

u buy something but kena grounded summore crash

abis la wei

gua kasi support manufacturer kasi troll sama gua
limeuu
post Jan 15 2020, 05:20 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,290 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 04:00 PM)
The new flight controls malfunctioned, is it through manufacturing problem or maintenance problem? Would additional training have helped in control failure situation? Why can't Lion Air get knowledge transfer from Malindo Air, which was already flying the Max?

So many questions, so few answers, but as typical in the court of public opinion, the one who was rude is the guilty party.
*
You obviously haven't been keeping up with the issue....it's a hardware defect which Boeing attempted to correct using software....when the software malfunction, the pilots were not trained to do the right thing....they should not try to correct the aircraft, but switch off the auto stabilizer. The aircraft will then correct itself....

So it's both a hardware and software problem intrinsic with the design of the aircraft....

Additional training on a simulator will alert pilots to this problem, how to react, and likely prevent the crashes....
Bendot
post Jan 15 2020, 05:35 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
46 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
QUOTE(kkboy @ Jan 15 2020, 09:04 AM)
Looks like i wont be booking Malindo air anymore lol
*
Malindo local flights dont use Max if i'm not mistaken...

soulknight
post Jan 15 2020, 05:41 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
549 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


QUOTE(cloud666 @ Jan 15 2020, 10:23 AM)
how is that so?
so is US seeing profit > human life openly to the world? (even we know they did)
if thats the case, more like US declaring war to the world
*
It's the same thing when US incite a war in Iraq n Afghanistan with the reason of WMD but now it turned out for OIL. Profit's comes first before human life.
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 15 2020, 05:46 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(limeuu @ Jan 15 2020, 05:20 PM)
You obviously haven't been keeping up with the issue....it's a hardware defect which Boeing attempted to correct using software....when the software malfunction, the pilots were not trained to do the right thing....they should not try to correct the aircraft, but switch off the auto stabilizer. The aircraft will then correct itself....

So it's both a hardware and software problem intrinsic with the design of the aircraft....

Additional training on a simulator will alert pilots to this problem, how to react, and likely prevent the crashes....
*
Sounds like something that can be covered with an email. No wonder Boeing rage. Ini machiam also want simulator???
ohman
post Jan 15 2020, 05:49 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,178 posts

Joined: Aug 2014
QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 05:46 PM)
Sounds like something that can be covered with an email. No wonder Boeing rage. Ini machiam also want simulator???
*
brows.gif


After 2 air crashes. Everyone is an expert in this matter.

2 years ago nobody know what the f this is.


bumpo
post Jan 15 2020, 06:01 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
632 posts

Joined: Mar 2013


QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 04:00 PM)
The new flight controls malfunctioned, is it through manufacturing problem or maintenance problem? Would additional training have helped in control failure situation? Why can't Lion Air get knowledge transfer from Malindo Air, which was already flying the Max?

So many questions, so few answers, but as typical in the court of public opinion, the one who was rude is the guilty party.
*
it is not the rude email but the fact that boeing convinced their customer that no training is needed which ultimately proved to be the very thing that could have prevented it

boeing's convincing customer that training is not needed is their undoing laugh.gif
creactz
post Jan 15 2020, 06:18 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
38 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 05:46 PM)
Sounds like something that can be covered with an email. No wonder Boeing rage. Ini machiam also want simulator???
*
u ask gordon ramsay write u email of his secret recipe, will u be as good as him ah? bodo
this thing no need train emergency/panic that time how? open email and read through again?
limeuu
post Jan 15 2020, 06:19 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,290 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 05:46 PM)
Sounds like something that can be covered with an email. No wonder Boeing rage. Ini machiam also want simulator???
*
Boeing knows the potential problems, but thought the software will work, in the background, and therefore no need to tell airlines and pilots....

Email?....lol you are so ignorant about flying.....lol

Boeing was very against additional simulator time because that's how they sell the max....by assuring airlines and pilots it will fly exactly like the 737ng....it doesn't because the new software change how the aircraft behaves....this is not something you teach by "email".....
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 15 2020, 06:21 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(ohman @ Jan 15 2020, 05:49 PM)
brows.gif
After 2 air crashes. Everyone is an expert in this matter.

2 years ago nobody know what the f this is.
*
Aiya Boeing shares taking a nosedive (pun intended) now that Airbus is eating into their market share, many people hating on Boeing. Their customer handling may be bad, but that doesn't mean they're obliged to provide a simulator training if not covered in purchase contract.

They're in the airplane building bitness, not in the pilot training bitness. Mati lo if losing money already still have to train pilots.
limeuu
post Jan 15 2020, 06:22 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,290 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 06:21 PM)
Aiya Boeing shares taking a nosedive (pun intended) now that Airbus is eating into their market share, many people hating on Boeing. Their customer handling may be bad, but that doesn't mean they're obliged to provide a simulator training if not covered in purchase contract.

They're in the airplane building bitness, not in the pilot training bitness. Mati lo if losing money already still have to train pilots.
*
Your ignorance is amazing....lol
teehk_tee
post Jan 15 2020, 06:24 PM

ไม่เป็นไร
*******
Senior Member
5,363 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: กรุงเทพมหานคร BKK

Muricunts
Henry T
post Jan 15 2020, 06:24 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
10 posts

Joined: Jun 2017


Some Americans are really dumb.
emino
post Jan 15 2020, 06:26 PM

IG - riezforester
*******
Senior Member
5,967 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Malaysia... Duh!


Bodoh ke apa tulis like that in office email? Meh abam ajar.

“Now friggin Lion Air might need a sim to fly the MAX, and maybe because of their own stupidity. I’m scrambling trying to figure out how to unscrew this now! idiots,” o
Lion Air still insist on simulated training the pilot, even after <insert standard procedure> completed, kindly advise.

“WHAT THE F%$&!!!! But their sister airline is already flying it!”
With all due respect, the procedure is already as per the standards used by their sister airline. Anything more we will need to review back our service level agreement and charge accordingly. Kindly communicate that to respective party.

Then ajak each other pergi mamak and then ko nak maki ke apa ke do it there lah aiyooo.
creactz
post Jan 15 2020, 06:29 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
38 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 06:21 PM)
Aiya Boeing shares taking a nosedive (pun intended) now that Airbus is eating into their market share, many people hating on Boeing. Their customer handling may be bad, but that doesn't mean they're obliged to provide a simulator training if not covered in purchase contract.

They're in the airplane building bitness, not in the pilot training bitness. Mati lo if losing money already still have to train pilots.
*
What weed u smoking? seems more and more retard.
keaizer
post Jan 15 2020, 06:32 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
432 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: iFag

Aku de tgk 1 documentary ni few years back pasal boeing plant ni even dieorg punya staff pun x berani nk naik the plane

But not sure 787 or 737 max
arsenwagon
post Jan 15 2020, 06:37 PM

all ur bass are belong to usa
*******
Senior Member
2,227 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: cheras



QUOTE(kkboy @ Jan 15 2020, 09:04 AM)
Looks like i wont be booking Malindo air anymore lol
*
Bersangka baik, malindo air pilot pndai and skilfull, sohai plane ain't no problem
kkboy
post Jan 15 2020, 07:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
113 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 04:00 PM)
The new flight controls malfunctioned, is it through manufacturing problem or maintenance problem? Would additional training have helped in control failure situation? Why can't Lion Air get knowledge transfer from Malindo Air, which was already flying the Max?

So many questions, so few answers, but as typical in the court of public opinion, the one who was rude is the guilty party.
*
The pilots couldn’t disable it in time or at all

If this material had been part of a training, the crashes would have been avoided.
kkboy
post Jan 15 2020, 07:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
113 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 06:21 PM)
Aiya Boeing shares taking a nosedive (pun intended) now that Airbus is eating into their market share, many people hating on Boeing. Their customer handling may be bad, but that doesn't mean they're obliged to provide a simulator training if not covered in purchase contract.

They're in the airplane building bitness, not in the pilot training bitness. Mati lo if losing money already still have to train pilots.
*
Duno what bitnes u in but sell industrial machines also have to provide training how to use lah, especially if requested by customer.
rooney723
post Jan 15 2020, 07:25 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
596 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
the main reason why boeing is so reluctant to provide additional training is because they pitched that the new 737-max is almost exactly same as older planes n nothing new is added (this is because competitor airbus released bigger n more powerful planes that operates the same as their older planes, if boeing admits that they added MCAS to overcome the plane tilting movement n additional training is required to fly the new planes (while airbus new planes doesnt need any new training) , then it will make boeing new planes look inferior compared to airbus's n airlines will prefer airbus instead
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 15 2020, 07:25 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(creactz @ Jan 15 2020, 06:18 PM)
u ask gordon ramsay write u email of his secret recipe, will u be as good as him ah? bodo
this thing no need train emergency/panic that time how? open email and read through again?
*
Yes, can. Why cannot? You've probably never operated a machine before.

QUOTE(limeuu @ Jan 15 2020, 06:19 PM)
Boeing knows the potential problems, but thought the software will work, in the background, and therefore no need to tell airlines and pilots....

Email?....lol you are so ignorant about flying.....lol

Boeing was very against additional simulator time because that's how they sell the max....by assuring airlines and pilots it will fly exactly like the 737ng....it doesn't because the new software change how the aircraft behaves....this is not something you teach by "email".....
*

In other words, it's the same as flying a 737ng sim with an email about the stabilizer.

Man no wonder you guys are losing out in the value chain.

ohman
post Jan 15 2020, 07:27 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,178 posts

Joined: Aug 2014
QUOTE(kkboy @ Jan 15 2020, 07:23 PM)
Duno what bitnes u in but sell industrial  machines also have to provide training how to use lah, especially if requested by customer.
*
Look at the way he answer question you can tell , he is no where technical, nor high tech.


MAGAMan-X
post Jan 15 2020, 07:29 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(limeuu @ Jan 15 2020, 06:22 PM)
Your ignorance is amazing....lol
*
QUOTE(creactz @ Jan 15 2020, 06:29 PM)
What weed u smoking? seems more and more retard.
*
Wow look at all the pilots in this thread!

QUOTE(kkboy @ Jan 15 2020, 07:19 PM)
The pilots couldn’t disable it in time or at all

If this material had been part of a training, the crashes would have been avoided.
*

So the training material is 737ng sim + instructions on rebooting a software.

QUOTE(kkboy @ Jan 15 2020, 07:23 PM)
Duno what bitnes u in but sell industrial  machines also have to provide training how to use lah, especially if requested by customer.
*
If industrial machines produce model A and then next time they produce model A+ and say it's the same but here is the instructions to reboot a feature, do you need an entire training on model A+?

In that case, I suggest you all go back to driving school each time you change car.
limeuu
post Jan 15 2020, 07:30 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,290 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 07:25 PM)
Yes, can. Why cannot? You've probably never operated a machine before.

In other words, it's the same as flying a 737ng sim with an email about the stabilizer.

Man no wonder you guys are losing out in the value chain.
*
Therein lies the reason for the disaster, and what caused the slide in Boeing technology.....

"Value chain".....
limeuu
post Jan 15 2020, 07:33 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,290 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 07:29 PM)

In that case,  I suggest you all go back to driving school each time you change car.
*
I was waiting for the "drive car" analogy....

Here it comes....

Yes, pilots actually go back to driving school when switching aircrafts....it's called conversion....
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 15 2020, 07:37 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(limeuu @ Jan 15 2020, 07:30 PM)
Therein lies the reason for the disaster, and what caused the slide in Boeing technology.....

"Value chain".....
*
Or a simple a communication problem. Learn how to look for root cause instead of blame la

QUOTE(limeuu @ Jan 15 2020, 07:33 PM)
I was waiting for the "drive car" analogy....

Here it comes....

Yes, pilots actually go back to driving school when switching aircrafts....it's called conversion....
*
We're talking about the same aircraft here.
limeuu
post Jan 15 2020, 08:22 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,290 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 07:37 PM)
Or a simple a communication problem. Learn how to look for root cause instead of blame la
We're talking about the same aircraft here.
*
Ah....that's the point..... Boeing wants people to think it's the same....it's not....

When the Ng was launched in 97, pilots needed to undergo conversion training....because of significant cockpit differences....

However, the more advanced a320 changed the game maintaining the same operations across the family 319/320/321/CEO/neo.....thus allowing pilots to be rated to fly all of them....that fact helps sell a lot of 320s (not to mention close similarity with the 330/340 as well, making conversion easy)....

So Boeing wants the same "value chain" to sell the max.....

Except the max had one big problem: engine too big for the low wings.... solution: put it in front.....

Guess what happens to the centre of gravity when you move 2 heavy engines forward?.....

Good "value chains"?.....lol
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 15 2020, 11:35 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(limeuu @ Jan 15 2020, 08:22 PM)
Ah....that's the point..... Boeing wants people to think it's the same....it's not....

When the Ng was launched in 97, pilots needed to undergo conversion training....because of significant cockpit differences....

However, the more advanced a320 changed the game maintaining the same operations across the family 319/320/321/CEO/neo.....thus allowing pilots to be rated to fly all of them....that fact helps sell a lot of 320s (not to mention close similarity with the 330/340 as well, making conversion easy)....

So Boeing wants the same "value chain" to sell the max.....

Except the max had one big problem: engine too big for the low wings.... solution: put it in front.....

Guess what happens to the centre of gravity when you move 2 heavy engines forward?.....

Good "value chains"?.....lol
*
I tire of this nonsense being thrown about

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_MAX
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion_Air_Flight_610

Basically, a co pilot who never took the sim already briefed the crew how to fix the malfunction, but the next crew failed to heed the advice, and because of lousy pilot skills, crashed the plane. I'm not saying Boeing is not at fault (never did) but you can't deny that a training sim is unnecessary, as Boeing also issued an operational guide to inform pilots.

You also seem to be obsessed with the words "value chain", not only do you not know how you use them, you had demonstrated you can't add value to the discussion proving me right in my judgement that you have not moved up the value chain. Being too busy finding fault can do that to people.

This post has been edited by MAGAMan-X: Jan 15 2020, 11:36 PM
limeuu
post Jan 16 2020, 12:33 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,290 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 11:35 PM)
I tire of this nonsense being thrown about

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_MAX
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion_Air_Flight_610

Basically, a co pilot who never took the sim already briefed the crew how to fix the malfunction, but the next crew failed to heed the advice, and because of lousy pilot skills, crashed the plane. I'm not saying Boeing is not at fault (never did) but you can't deny that a training sim is unnecessary, as Boeing also issued an operational guide to inform pilots.

You also seem to be obsessed with the words "value chain", not only do you not know how you use them, you had demonstrated you can't add value to the discussion proving me right in my judgement that you have not moved up the value chain. Being too busy finding fault can do that to people.
*
Rubbish.....

Boeing never inform pilots.of the mcas....

An intrinsic defect in the aircraft to be corrected by a co-pilot's advice?....seriously? That's how you would solve this problem?

Would a sim training avoid the crashes?.... subsequent SIM simulation crashes.....because pilots reaction to mcas was different from Boeing's expectation.....so it may certainly pick up problems with pilot reactions....

Finding fault?....me?....Why would the whole world ground all maxs, if it's not at fault?....I didn't ground them....

As to value chain....its obsession with the whole idea that caused Boeing to keep modifying an aged frame instead of a new aircraft....even to the extend a /k discussion needs to "move up the value chain".....lol
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 16 2020, 02:01 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(limeuu @ Jan 16 2020, 12:33 AM)
Rubbish.....

Boeing never inform pilots.of the mcas....

An intrinsic defect in the aircraft to be corrected by a co-pilot's advice?....seriously? That's how you would solve this problem?

Would a sim training avoid the crashes?.... subsequent SIM simulation crashes.....because pilots reaction to mcas was different from Boeing's expectation.....so it may certainly pick up problems with pilot reactions....

Finding fault?....me?....Why would the whole world ground all maxs, if it's not at fault?....I didn't ground them....

As to value chain....its obsession with the whole idea that caused Boeing to keep modifying an aged frame instead of a new aircraft....even to the extend a /k discussion needs to "move up the value chain".....lol
*
Your ignorance is amazing.... lol
focusrite
post Jan 16 2020, 02:27 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
409 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
Why got Malaysian here want to defend boing
HeartR0bber
post Jan 16 2020, 02:56 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
2016 video

TS slowpoke
ladytarot99
post Jan 16 2020, 02:59 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
392 posts

Joined: Jul 2019


QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 09:45 AM)
Simple case of right hand don't talk to left hand, and then put the blame on vendor. Standard attitude in the end of service line companies.
*
I almost forget tokkok in this thread.

QUOTE(kitzai @ Jan 15 2020, 09:55 AM)
But now all MAX are grounded right ?
*
Yes, no more commercials flight using max in indonesia, malaysia, Singapore, Thailand. Viet, Philippine and Myanmar out of my radar sorry.

QUOTE(RicoT @ Jan 15 2020, 09:56 AM)
No wonder Lion Air is so furious, then came another crash, Boeing can say it is as good as dead now. 737MAX grounded with no expected date of return, 737NG facing pitch fork crack issues.
*
Because this is not he first incident. Lion was always under question regarding the safety record. They’ve made it passed IOSA few years back, However the score just enough to pass. If they couldn’t maintain the record, Definitely Indonesian Authority would give AOC suspension. When the incident happened, all lion board members were extremely under pressure. Had to dealing with the incident, scrutinised by the people, and non stop meeting with the ministry of transport for every single updates.

kamfoo
post Jan 16 2020, 03:16 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
845 posts

Joined: Nov 2010


make boeing great again
Skylinestar
post Jan 16 2020, 03:19 AM

Mega Duck
********
All Stars
10,471 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sarawak
Nothing to see here. Asian and illegal jobs berpisah tiada.
ladytarot99
post Jan 16 2020, 04:53 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
392 posts

Joined: Jul 2019


QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 04:00 PM)
The new flight controls malfunctioned, is it through manufacturing problem or maintenance problem? Would additional training have helped in control failure situation? Why can't Lion Air get knowledge transfer from Malindo Air, which was already flying the Max?

So many questions, so few answers, but as typical in the court of public opinion, the one who was rude is the guilty party.
*
QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 05:46 PM)
Sounds like something that can be covered with an email. No wonder Boeing rage. Ini machiam also want simulator???
*
QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 06:21 PM)
Aiya Boeing shares taking a nosedive (pun intended) now that Airbus is eating into their market share, many people hating on Boeing. Their customer handling may be bad, but that doesn't mean they're obliged to provide a simulator training if not covered in purchase contract.

They're in the airplane building bitness, not in the pilot training bitness. Mati lo if losing money already still have to train pilots.
*
QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 15 2020, 07:29 PM)
Wow look at all the pilots in this thread!

So the training material is 737ng sim + instructions on rebooting a software.
If industrial machines produce model A and then next time they produce model A+ and say it's the same but here is the instructions to reboot a feature, do you need an entire training on model A+?

In that case,  I suggest you all go back to driving school each time you change car.
*
QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 16 2020, 02:01 AM)
Your ignorance is amazing....  lol
*
You keeps on bising pasal training and challenging others... if the pilot were well trained, of course it would make a big different.

FYI.. Training, familiarisation, technical and support always part of the sales and purchase agreement AFAIK.

This is small part of agreement that mentioned about the customer support, maintenance and flight training upon the purchased of 737NG..

CUSTOMER SUPPORT DOCUMENT
PART 1: BOEING MAINTENANCE AND FLIGHT TRAINING

PROGRAMS; OPERATIONS ENGINEERING SUPPORT

1. Boeing Training Programs.

1.1 Boeing will provide maintenance training and flight training programs
to support the introduction of a specific model of aircraft into service. The
training programs will consist of general and specialized courses and will be
described in a Supplemental Exhibit to the applicable purchase agreement.

1.2 Boeing will conduct all training at Boeing's primary training facility
for the model of aircraft purchased unless otherwise agreed.

1.3 All training will be presented in the English language. If translation
is required, Customer will provide interpreters.

1.4 Customer will be responsible for all expenses of Customer's personnel.
Boeing will transport Customer's personnel between their local lodging and
Boeing's training facility.

2. Training Planning Conferences.

Customer and Boeing will conduct planning conferences approximately 12
months before the scheduled delivery month of the first aircraft of a model to
define and schedule the maintenance and flight training programs.

3. Operations Engineering Support.

3.1 As long as an aircraft purchased by Customer from Boeing is operated
by Customer in scheduled revenue service, Boeing will provide operations
engineering support. Such support will include:

3.1.1 assistance with the analysis and preparation of performance
data to be used in establishing operating practices and policies for Customer's
operation of aircraft;

3.1.2 assistance with interpretation of the minimum equipment list,
the definition of the configuration deviation list and the analysis of
individual aircraft performance;

3.1.3 assistance with solving operational problems associated with
delivery and route-proving flights;

3.1.4 information regarding significant service items relating to
aircraft performance or flight operations; and

3.1.5 if requested by Customer, Boeing will provide operations
engineering support during an aircraft ferry flight.

4. Training at a Facility Other Than Boeing's.

If requested by Customer, Boeing will conduct the classroom portions of
the maintenance and flight training (except for the Performance Engineer
training courses) at a mutually acceptable alternate training site, subject to
the following conditions:

4.1 Customer will provide acceptable classroom space, simulators (as
necessary for flight training) and training equipment required to present the
courses;

4.2 Customer will pay Boeing's then-current per diem charge for each
Boeing instructor for each day, or fraction thereof, that the instructor is away
from their home location, including travel time;

4.3 Customer will reimburse Boeing for the actual costs of round-trip
transportation for Boeing's instructors and the shipping costs of training
Materials between the primary training facility and the alternate training site;

4.4 Customer will be responsible for all taxes, fees, duties, licenses,
permits and similar expenses incurred by Boeing and its employees as a result of
Boeing's providing training at the alternate site or incurred as a result of
Boeing providing revenue service training; and

4.5 Those portions of training that require the use of training devices
not available at the alternate site will be conducted at Boeing's facility or at
some other alternate site.

5. General Terms and Conditions.

5.1 Boeing flight instructor personnel will not be required to work more
than 5 days per week, or more than 8 hours in any one 24-hour period, of which
not more than 5 hours per 8-hour workday will be spent in actual flying. These
foregoing restrictions will not apply to ferry assistance or revenue service
training services, which will be governed by FAA rules and regulations.

5.2 NORMAL LINE MAINTENANCE is defined as line maintenance that Boeing
might reasonably be expected to furnish for flight crew training at Boeing's
facility, and will include ground support and aircraft storage in the open, but
will not include provision of spare parts. Boeing will provide Normal Line
Maintenance services for any
aircraft while the aircraft is used for flight crew training at Boeing's
facility in accordance with the Boeing Maintenance Plan (Boeing document
D6-xxxxxx) and the Repair Station Operation and Inspection Manual (Boeing
document D6-xxxxx), which terms are available to Customer upon reasonable
request. Customer will provide such services if flight crew training is
conducted elsewhere. Regardless of the location of such training, Customer will
be responsible for providing all maintenance items (other than those included in
Normal Line Maintenance) required during the training, including, but not
limited to, fuel, oil, landing fees and spare parts. Boeing will assist Customer
with purchase of any such items, at no additional cost to Customer.

5.3 If the training is based at Boeing's facility, and the aircraft is
damaged during such training, Boeing will make all necessary repairs to the
aircraft as promptly as possible. Customer will pay Boeing's reasonable charge,
including the price of parts and materials, for making the repairs. If Boeing's
estimated labor charge for the repair exceeds $25,000, Boeing and Customer will
enter into an agreement for additional services before beginning the repair
work.

5.4 If the flight training is based at Boeing's facility, several airports
in surrounding states may be used, at Boeing's option. Unless otherwise agreed
in the flight training planning conference, it will be Customer's responsibility
to make arrangements for the use of such airports.

5.5 If Boeing agrees to make arrangements on behalf of Customer for the
use of airports for flight training, Boeing will pay on Customer's behalf any
landing fees charged by any airport used in conjunction with the flight
training. Boeing will submit to Customer an invoice for any such landing fees
Boeing has paid on Customer's behalf, approximately 60 days after flight
training is completed, when all landing fee charges have been received and
verified. Customer will pay to Boeing within 30 days of the date of the invoice.

5.6 If requested by Boeing, in order to provide the flight training or
ferry flight assistance, Customer will make available to Boeing an aircraft
after delivery to familiarize Boeing instructor or ferry flight crew personnel
with such aircraft. If flight of the aircraft is required for any Boeing
instructor or ferry flight crew member to maintain an FAA license for flight
proficiency or landing currency, Boeing will be responsible for the costs of
fuel, oil, landing fees and spare parts attributable to that portion of the
flight.

5.7 If any part of the training described in Article 1.1 of this Exhibit
is not used by Customer within 12 months after the delivery of the last aircraft
under the relevant purchase agreement, Boeing will not be obligated to provide
such training.



VS




Boeing 737Max

CUSTOMER SUPPORT VARIABLES relating to BOEING MODEL 737 MAX AIRCRAFT



Customer and Boeing will conduct planning conferences approximately twelve (12) months prior to delivery of the first Aircraft, or as mutually agreed, in order to develop and schedule a customized Customer Support Program to be furnished by Boeing in support of the Aircraft.
The customized Customer Services Program will be based upon and equivalent to the entitlements summarized below.

1. Maintenance Training.
1.1 Mechanical/Power Plant Course; one (1) class of fifteen (15) students;
1.2 Electrical Systems Course; one (1) class of fifteen (15) students;
1.3 Avionics Systems Course; one (1) class of fifteen (15) students;
1.4 Aircraft Rigging Course; one (1) class of six (6) students;
1.5 Advanced Composite Repair Course; one (1) class of eight (8) students.
1.6 Training materials will be provided to each student. In addition, one set of training materials as used in Boeing’s training program, including visual aids, Computer Based Training Courseware, instrument panel wall charts, text/graphics, video programs, etc. will be provided for use in Customer’s own training program.


2. Flight Training.
2.1 Boeing will provide one classroom course to acquaint up to eight (8) students (four (4) flight crews) with operational, systems and performance differences between Customer’s newly-purchased Aircraft and an aircraft of the same model currently operated by Customer.
2.2 Training materials will be provided to each student. In addition, one set of training materials as used in Boeing’s training program, including Computer Based Training Courseware, instrument panel wall charts, Flight Attendant Manuals, etc. will be provided for use in Customer’s own training program. Customer is authorized to duplicate and use Boeing provided training materials to train Customer’s personnel in their own training program, it being understood that revision service for these materials is not provided by Boeing.




TLDR = Yes, as the buyer, you have every single right to get/request full training and operational systems course of your newly-purchased aircraft From the Seller/Manufacturer!!


The staffs who involved in those conversations, not only being RUDE.. They are also GUILTY!

#DoneDakwah



















#Legal disclaimer = @LadyTarot99 makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the information, content, materials included on this comment and @LadyTarot99 will not be liable for any financial or legal damages arising from This Ultimately, all Of my comment are understood to be for entertainment purposes only.
limeuu
post Jan 16 2020, 08:01 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,290 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

#DoneDakwah
#Legal disclaimer = @LadyTarot99 makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the information, content, materials included on this comment and @LadyTarot99 will not be liable for any financial or legal damages arising from This Ultimately, all Of my comment are understood to be for entertainment purposes only.
*
You are not "value adding" to the discussion..... apparently ...lol
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 16 2020, 04:27 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(ladytarot99 @ Jan 16 2020, 04:53 AM)
You keeps on bising pasal training and challenging others... if the pilot were well trained, of course it would make a big different.

FYI.. Training, familiarisation, technical and support always part of the sales and purchase agreement AFAIK.

This is small part of agreement that mentioned about the customer support, maintenance and flight training upon the purchased of 737NG..

CUSTOMER SUPPORT DOCUMENT
PART 1: BOEING MAINTENANCE AND FLIGHT TRAINING
                   
PROGRAMS; OPERATIONS ENGINEERING SUPPORT

1.    Boeing Training Programs.

      1.1 Boeing will provide maintenance training and flight training programs
to support the introduction of a specific model of aircraft into service. The
training programs will consist of general and specialized courses and will be
described in a Supplemental Exhibit to the applicable purchase agreement.

      1.2 Boeing will conduct all training at Boeing's primary training facility
for the model of aircraft purchased unless otherwise agreed.

      1.3 All training will be presented in the English language. If translation
is required, Customer will provide interpreters.

      1.4 Customer will be responsible for all expenses of Customer's personnel.
Boeing will transport Customer's personnel between their local lodging and
Boeing's training facility.

2.    Training Planning Conferences.

      Customer and Boeing will conduct planning conferences approximately 12
months before the scheduled delivery month of the first aircraft of a model to
define and schedule the maintenance and flight training programs.

3.    Operations Engineering Support.

      3.1 As long as an aircraft purchased by Customer from Boeing is operated
by Customer in scheduled revenue service, Boeing will provide operations
engineering support. Such support will include:

            3.1.1 assistance with the analysis and preparation of performance
data to be used in establishing operating practices and policies for Customer's
operation of aircraft;

            3.1.2 assistance with interpretation of the minimum equipment list,
the definition of the configuration deviation list and the analysis of
individual aircraft performance;

            3.1.3 assistance with solving operational problems associated with
delivery and route-proving flights;

            3.1.4 information regarding significant service items relating to
aircraft performance or flight operations; and

            3.1.5 if requested by Customer, Boeing will provide operations
engineering support during an aircraft ferry flight.

4.    Training at a Facility Other Than Boeing's.

      If requested by Customer, Boeing will conduct the classroom portions of
the maintenance and flight training (except for the Performance Engineer
training courses) at a mutually acceptable alternate training site, subject to
the following conditions:

      4.1 Customer will provide acceptable classroom space, simulators (as
necessary for flight training) and training equipment required to present the
courses;

      4.2 Customer will pay Boeing's then-current per diem charge for each
Boeing instructor for each day, or fraction thereof, that the instructor is away
from their home location, including travel time;

      4.3 Customer will reimburse Boeing for the actual costs of round-trip
transportation for Boeing's instructors and the shipping costs of training
Materials between the primary training facility and the alternate training site;

      4.4 Customer will be responsible for all taxes, fees, duties, licenses,
permits and similar expenses incurred by Boeing and its employees as a result of
Boeing's providing training at the alternate site or incurred as a result of
Boeing providing revenue service training; and

      4.5 Those portions of training that require the use of training devices
not available at the alternate site will be conducted at Boeing's facility or at
some other alternate site.

5.    General Terms and Conditions.

      5.1 Boeing flight instructor personnel will not be required to work more
than 5 days per week, or more than 8 hours in any one 24-hour period, of which
not more than 5 hours per 8-hour workday will be spent in actual flying. These
foregoing restrictions will not apply to ferry assistance or revenue service
training services, which will be governed by FAA rules and regulations.

      5.2 NORMAL LINE MAINTENANCE is defined as line maintenance that Boeing
might reasonably be expected to furnish for flight crew training at Boeing's
facility, and will include ground support and aircraft storage in the open, but
will not include provision of spare parts. Boeing will provide Normal Line
Maintenance services for any
aircraft while the aircraft is used for flight crew training at Boeing's
facility in accordance with the Boeing Maintenance Plan (Boeing document
D6-xxxxxx) and the Repair Station Operation and Inspection Manual (Boeing
document D6-xxxxx), which terms are available to Customer upon reasonable
request. Customer will provide such services if flight crew training is
conducted elsewhere. Regardless of the location of such training, Customer will
be responsible for providing all maintenance items (other than those included in
Normal Line Maintenance) required during the training, including, but not
limited to, fuel, oil, landing fees and spare parts. Boeing will assist Customer
with purchase of any such items, at no additional cost to Customer.

      5.3 If the training is based at Boeing's facility, and the aircraft is
damaged during such training, Boeing will make all necessary repairs to the
aircraft as promptly as possible. Customer will pay Boeing's reasonable charge,
including the price of parts and materials, for making the repairs. If Boeing's
estimated labor charge for the repair exceeds $25,000, Boeing and Customer will
enter into an agreement for additional services before beginning the repair
work.

      5.4 If the flight training is based at Boeing's facility, several airports
in surrounding states may be used, at Boeing's option. Unless otherwise agreed
in the flight training planning conference, it will be Customer's responsibility
to make arrangements for the use of such airports.

      5.5 If Boeing agrees to make arrangements on behalf of Customer for the
use of airports for flight training, Boeing will pay on Customer's behalf any
landing fees charged by any airport used in conjunction with the flight
training. Boeing will submit to Customer an invoice for any such landing fees
Boeing has paid on Customer's behalf, approximately 60 days after flight
training is completed, when all landing fee charges have been received and
verified. Customer will pay to Boeing within 30 days of the date of the invoice.

      5.6 If requested by Boeing, in order to provide the flight training or
ferry flight assistance, Customer will make available to Boeing an aircraft
after delivery to familiarize Boeing instructor or ferry flight crew personnel
with such aircraft. If flight of the aircraft is required for any Boeing
instructor or ferry flight crew member to maintain an FAA license for flight
proficiency or landing currency, Boeing will be responsible for the costs of
fuel, oil, landing fees and spare parts attributable to that portion of the
flight.

      5.7 If any part of the training described in Article 1.1 of this Exhibit
is not used by Customer within 12 months after the delivery of the last aircraft
under the relevant purchase agreement, Boeing will not be obligated to provide
such training.
VS
Boeing 737Max

CUSTOMER SUPPORT VARIABLES relating to BOEING MODEL 737 MAX AIRCRAFT
Customer and Boeing will conduct planning conferences approximately twelve (12) months prior to delivery of the first Aircraft, or as mutually agreed, in order to develop and schedule a customized Customer Support Program to be furnished by Boeing in support of the Aircraft.
The customized Customer Services Program will be based upon and equivalent to the entitlements summarized below.

1. Maintenance Training.
1.1 Mechanical/Power Plant Course; one (1) class of fifteen (15) students;
1.2 Electrical Systems Course; one (1) class of fifteen (15) students;
1.3 Avionics Systems Course; one (1) class of fifteen (15) students;
1.4 Aircraft Rigging Course; one (1) class of six (6) students;
1.5 Advanced Composite Repair Course; one (1) class of eight (8) students.
1.6 Training materials will be provided to each student. In addition, one set of training materials as used in Boeing’s training program, including visual aids, Computer Based Training Courseware, instrument panel wall charts, text/graphics, video programs, etc. will be provided for use in Customer’s own training program.
2. Flight Training.
2.1 Boeing will provide one classroom course to acquaint up to eight (8) students (four (4) flight crews) with operational, systems and performance differences between Customer’s newly-purchased Aircraft and an aircraft of the same model currently operated by Customer.
2.2 Training materials will be provided to each student. In addition, one set of training materials as used in Boeing’s training program, including Computer Based Training Courseware, instrument panel wall charts, Flight Attendant Manuals, etc. will be provided for use in Customer’s own training program. Customer is authorized to duplicate and use Boeing provided training materials to train Customer’s personnel in their own training program, it being understood that revision service for these materials is not provided by Boeing.
TLDR = Yes, as the buyer, you have every single right to get/request full training and operational systems course of your newly-purchased aircraft From the Seller/Manufacturer!!
The staffs who involved in those conversations, not only being  RUDE.. They are also GUILTY!

#DoneDakwah
#Legal disclaimer = @LadyTarot99 makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the information, content, materials included on this comment and @LadyTarot99 will not be liable for any financial or legal damages arising from This Ultimately, all Of my comment are understood to be for entertainment purposes only.
*
Interesting, I actually read every sentence. So has Lion Air pilots already gone through that one round of training? Also it doesn't say in the contract it has to be flight sim training, unless "classroom course" includes flight sim.

Going back to the crash, there was a Lion Air pilot who already informed the crew on the bug and how to fix the bug the day before the crash. So why is one pilot competent but the other pilot is not?

Again this sounds like a witch-hunt against Boeing because they were rude. Kinda like how Trump haters support terrorists because they hate Trump.

This post has been edited by MAGAMan-X: Jan 16 2020, 04:28 PM
ladytarot99
post Jan 16 2020, 06:05 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
392 posts

Joined: Jul 2019


QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 16 2020, 04:27 PM)
Interesting, I actually read every sentence. So has Lion Air pilots already gone through that one round of training? Also it doesn't say in the contract it has to be flight sim training, unless "classroom course" includes flight sim.

Going back to the crash, there was a Lion Air pilot who already informed the crew on the bug and how to fix the bug the day before the crash. So why is one pilot competent but the other pilot is not?

Again this sounds like a witch-hunt against Boeing because they were rude. Kinda like how Trump haters support terrorists because they hate Trump.
*
That’s the reason why B*eing is at fault. ....” From its inception, Boeing’s 737 Max was designed to save airlines the expense of training their pilots on flight simulators. During the initial approval of the plane and after two crashes killed 346 people last year, Boeing argued in conversations with the Federal Aviation Administration that simulator training was not necessary.

Now, after a worldwide grounding has cost the company billions of dollars over nearly 10 months and caused it to temporarily halt the production of the Max, Boeing has reversed course. On Tuesday, the company said it would recommend that pilots train in flight simulators before flying the Max.” NY times.

No SIM training on MAX because Boeing never provide and thinks that unnecessary. Now statements putar halim. And the worst part, when the buyer requested, they laugh at them... this is not cheap Bentl*y or Ferr*ri.. This is d*mn aeroplane!!! I can’t brain their staffs could made fun of it...




Meanwhile,





Sim training most likely always been part of the “Seller Flight Training Program” in the past.



......”3.1 Flight Crew Training Course.

Transition training for 6 flight crews (12 pilots); The training will consist of grounds school (utilizing computer based training), fixed base simulator, full flight simulator and actual aircraft training on Customer's Aircraft.

3.2 Flight Dispatcher Training Course.

Flight Dispatcher training; 5 Days, up to 10 people

3.3 Flight Attendant Training Course.

Flight Attendant training; 3 Days, up to 20 people

3.4 Performance Engineer Training Courses.

Performance Engineer Training; will be provided at Seller's facility, up to 5 people....”



Regarding your question about Lion air’s pilot about how, what, why, who.... I can’t answer, I’m not working for lion air, nor owned the company. Please contact lion air directly if you want further/details info..


And it’s not a witch-hunt!!!! 346 passengers killed...! And they are at fault, the company, the employees, because not only failed to address the changes, and provide necessary training, they’re t*lk sh*t when they should be professional. I bet, you’ll never understand till the karma knock you hard #SMH




#Legal disclaimer = @LadyTarot99 makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the information, content, materials included on this comment and @LadyTarot99 will not be liable for any financial or legal damages arising from This Ultimately, all Of my comment are understood to be for entertainment purposes only.
ladytarot99
post Jan 16 2020, 06:05 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
392 posts

Joined: Jul 2019


[quote=limeuu,Jan 16 2020, 08:01 AM]
[/spoiler]
#DoneDakwah
#Legal disclaimer = @LadyTarot99 makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the information, content, materials included on this comment and @LadyTarot99 will not be liable for any financial or legal damages arising from This Ultimately, all Of my comment are understood to be for entertainment purposes only.
*

[/quote]
You are not "value adding" to the discussion..... apparently ...lol
*

[/quote]


Understood !👌🏻
Stigonboard
post Jan 16 2020, 06:10 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Aug 2014
QUOTE(0168257061 @ Jan 15 2020, 08:04 AM)
Lion Air had initially raised concerns about the need for simulator training on the Max but ultimately accepted Boeing’s recommendation that it was unnecessary.
*
Coz the sister company malaysia based Malindo have no issue

But boeing forgot that indonesian pilot cannot compare with malaysian pilots which is different breed n expertise

This post has been edited by Stigonboard: Jan 16 2020, 06:10 PM
ladytarot99
post Jan 16 2020, 06:26 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
392 posts

Joined: Jul 2019


QUOTE(Stigonboard @ Jan 16 2020, 06:10 PM)
Coz the sister company malaysia based Malindo have no issue

But boeing forgot that indonesian pilot cannot compare with  malaysian pilots which is different breed n expertise
*
Don’t stir the racial issue.. for your information, when many of the malaysian pilot can’t rely on our local Aviation job, Indonesian Aviation welcome them to get a decent job and decent salary. Many Indonesian pilot that I know worked for first line airways, doing great, and they are equally good with ours. Stop looking down at others, look at malaysia current situation! Another katak bawah tempurung !
Stigonboard
post Jan 16 2020, 06:36 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Aug 2014
QUOTE(ladytarot99 @ Jan 16 2020, 06:26 PM)
Don’t stir the racial issue.. for your information, when many of the malaysian pilot can’t rely on our local Aviation job, Indonesian Aviation welcome them to get a decent job and decent salary. Many Indonesian pilot that I know worked for first line airways, doing great, and they are equally good with ours. Stop looking down at others, look at malaysia current situation! Another katak bawah tempurung !
*
Its not racism issue

Malaysian pilots are one of the best trained in the world hence why so many gulf, singaporean and Indonesians airlines are chasing malaysian trained pilots

Go google on indonesian airliners issue and how most accidents actually caused by human error

Garuda and Lion Air actually has been suspended few times by FAA and EU authority for safety issue and one of the big reason is inadequate pilot trainings

Stop being racist and look into the issue objectively
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 16 2020, 06:48 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(ladytarot99 @ Jan 16 2020, 06:05 PM)
That’s the reason why B*eing is at fault.  ....” From its inception, Boeing’s 737 Max was designed to save airlines the expense of training their pilots on flight simulators. During the initial approval of the plane and after two crashes killed 346 people last year, Boeing argued in conversations with the Federal Aviation Administration that simulator training was not necessary.

Now, after a worldwide grounding has cost the company billions of dollars over nearly 10 months and caused it to temporarily halt the production of the Max, Boeing has reversed course. On Tuesday, the company said it would recommend that pilots train in flight simulators before flying the Max.” NY times.

No SIM training on MAX because Boeing never provide and thinks that unnecessary. Now statements putar halim. And the worst part, when the buyer requested, they laugh at them... this is not cheap Bentl*y or Ferr*ri.. This is d*mn aeroplane!!! I can’t brain their staffs could made fun of it...
Meanwhile,
Sim training most likely always been part of the “Seller Flight Training Program” in the past.
......”3.1 Flight Crew Training Course.

Transition training for 6 flight crews (12 pilots); The training will consist of grounds school (utilizing computer based training), fixed base simulator, full flight simulator and actual aircraft training on Customer's Aircraft.

3.2 Flight Dispatcher Training Course.

Flight Dispatcher training; 5 Days, up to 10 people

3.3 Flight Attendant Training Course.

Flight Attendant training; 3 Days, up to 20 people

3.4 Performance Engineer Training Courses.

Performance Engineer Training; will be provided at Seller's facility, up to 5 people....”
Regarding your question about Lion air’s pilot about how, what, why, who.... I can’t answer, I’m not working for lion air, nor owned the company. Please contact lion air directly if you want further/details info..
And it’s not a witch-hunt!!!! 346 passengers killed...! And they are at fault, the company, the employees, because not only failed to address the changes, and provide necessary training, they’re t*lk sh*t when they should be professional. I bet, you’ll never understand till the karma knock you hard #SMH
#Legal disclaimer = @LadyTarot99 makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the information, content, materials included on this comment and @LadyTarot99 will not be liable for any financial or legal damages arising from This Ultimately, all Of my comment are understood to be for entertainment purposes only.
*
Lion air is not only the ones who bought the airplane, and there is clearly a difference in outcome when it came to competency of pilots

But this is a situation that people are judging Boeing guilty based on internal communication, rather than the malfunction.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion_Air_Flight_610
0168257061
post Jan 16 2020, 06:49 PM

EimiFukada
********
All Stars
14,242 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: JAVABUS


QUOTE(Stigonboard @ Jan 16 2020, 06:10 PM)
Coz the sister company malaysia based Malindo have no issue

But boeing forgot that indonesian pilot cannot compare with  malaysian pilots which is different breed n expertise
*
Dono srs or /s
SUSNew Klang
post Jan 16 2020, 06:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,998 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
Parking here to learn from experts
Stigonboard
post Jan 16 2020, 07:18 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Aug 2014
QUOTE(0168257061 @ Jan 16 2020, 06:49 PM)
Dono srs or /s
*
There is a reason why Garuda and Lion Air has been suspended by FAA and EU few times and there is lot of accidents due to pilot error and lack of maintenance even before 737 max case

And also another reason why Malaysian pilot is highly in demand by Singaporean, gulf and indonesian airliners
differ
post Jan 16 2020, 07:29 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
404 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(macyhouse @ Jan 15 2020, 09:09 AM)
one Boeing employee wrote in June 2017 text messages

* text msg so probably it’s old windows messenger lync
*
Lync retired and replaced by SfB in 2015.

SfB in turn will be killed off for Teams in 2021.
ladytarot99
post Jan 16 2020, 08:38 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
392 posts

Joined: Jul 2019


QUOTE(Stigonboard @ Jan 16 2020, 06:36 PM)
Its not racism issue

Malaysian pilots are one of the best trained in the world hence why so many gulf, singaporean and Indonesians airlines are chasing malaysian trained pilots

Go google on indonesian airliners issue and how most accidents actually caused by human error

Garuda and Lion Air actually has been suspended few times by FAA and EU authority for safety issue and one of the big reason is inadequate pilot trainings

Stop being racist and look into the issue objectively
*
You don’t have to explain about Garuda, Lion, or Pilot. And I don’t have to check on google about the reason why FAA and EU suspended Garuda or Lion. You are the one who bring “breed” on your comment. That’s why I remind you about the racial issue. Thanks.
ladytarot99
post Jan 16 2020, 08:47 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
392 posts

Joined: Jul 2019


QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 16 2020, 06:48 PM)
Lion air is not only the ones who bought the airplane, and there is clearly a difference in outcome when it came to competency of pilots

But this is a situation that people are judging Boeing guilty based on internal communication, rather than the malfunction.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion_Air_Flight_610
*
Whatever you want to say lahhh... if your comments really matters, go flip the table in front of FAA.
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 16 2020, 09:35 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(ladytarot99 @ Jan 16 2020, 08:47 PM)
Whatever you want to say lahhh... if your comments really matters, go flip the table in front of FAA.
*
Same goes for yours, pretty sure Boeing will get away with it
ladytarot99
post Jan 16 2020, 09:42 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
392 posts

Joined: Jul 2019


QUOTE(MAGAMan-X @ Jan 16 2020, 09:35 PM)
Same goes for yours, pretty sure Boeing will get away with it
*
Well, their market is screwed anyway. Let them be whatever they wants to be... We’re quite happy with A320&330neo so far whistling.gif whistling.gif
Stigonboard
post Jan 16 2020, 09:52 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Aug 2014
QUOTE(ladytarot99 @ Jan 16 2020, 08:38 PM)
You don’t have to explain about Garuda, Lion, or Pilot. And I don’t have to check on google about the reason why FAA and EU suspended Garuda or Lion. You are the one who bring “breed” on your comment. That’s why I remind you about the racial issue. Thanks.
*
Lol

“Breed” is common term in professionals to explain the level of expertise, skillset, experience etc

Nothing racist about it

You need to read more journal and articles to expand your vocab before accusing ppl
ladytarot99
post Jan 16 2020, 09:57 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
392 posts

Joined: Jul 2019


QUOTE(Stigonboard @ Jan 16 2020, 09:52 PM)
Lol

“Breed” is common term in professionals to explain the level of expertise, skillset, experience etc

Nothing racist about it

You need to read more journal and articles to expand your vocab before accusing ppl
*
Thanks for the info, and apologies for the misunderstanding. As I never use that term before.

This post has been edited by ladytarot99: Jan 16 2020, 09:57 PM

Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0371sec    1.05    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 01:22 PM