Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Boeing Mocked Lion Air B737 Max Simulator Request, Before Crash

views
     
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 15 2020, 09:45 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


Simple case of right hand don't talk to left hand, and then put the blame on vendor. Standard attitude in the end of service line companies.
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 15 2020, 04:00 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(RobUlstan @ Jan 15 2020, 10:16 AM)
What do you mean? In this case, by all indications, IT IS the fault of the vendor.
*
The new flight controls malfunctioned, is it through manufacturing problem or maintenance problem? Would additional training have helped in control failure situation? Why can't Lion Air get knowledge transfer from Malindo Air, which was already flying the Max?

So many questions, so few answers, but as typical in the court of public opinion, the one who was rude is the guilty party.
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 15 2020, 04:03 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(ohman @ Jan 15 2020, 04:01 PM)
What makes you think malindo air knew about this?
Nobody knew.
They talked about malindo because malindo accepted and were flying the plane while lion air rejected and wanted a training prior to accepting it.
*
Again... Seems like a left/right hand thing.
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 15 2020, 05:46 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(limeuu @ Jan 15 2020, 05:20 PM)
You obviously haven't been keeping up with the issue....it's a hardware defect which Boeing attempted to correct using software....when the software malfunction, the pilots were not trained to do the right thing....they should not try to correct the aircraft, but switch off the auto stabilizer. The aircraft will then correct itself....

So it's both a hardware and software problem intrinsic with the design of the aircraft....

Additional training on a simulator will alert pilots to this problem, how to react, and likely prevent the crashes....
*
Sounds like something that can be covered with an email. No wonder Boeing rage. Ini machiam also want simulator???
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 15 2020, 06:21 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(ohman @ Jan 15 2020, 05:49 PM)
brows.gif
After 2 air crashes. Everyone is an expert in this matter.

2 years ago nobody know what the f this is.
*
Aiya Boeing shares taking a nosedive (pun intended) now that Airbus is eating into their market share, many people hating on Boeing. Their customer handling may be bad, but that doesn't mean they're obliged to provide a simulator training if not covered in purchase contract.

They're in the airplane building bitness, not in the pilot training bitness. Mati lo if losing money already still have to train pilots.
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 15 2020, 07:25 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(creactz @ Jan 15 2020, 06:18 PM)
u ask gordon ramsay write u email of his secret recipe, will u be as good as him ah? bodo
this thing no need train emergency/panic that time how? open email and read through again?
*
Yes, can. Why cannot? You've probably never operated a machine before.

QUOTE(limeuu @ Jan 15 2020, 06:19 PM)
Boeing knows the potential problems, but thought the software will work, in the background, and therefore no need to tell airlines and pilots....

Email?....lol you are so ignorant about flying.....lol

Boeing was very against additional simulator time because that's how they sell the max....by assuring airlines and pilots it will fly exactly like the 737ng....it doesn't because the new software change how the aircraft behaves....this is not something you teach by "email".....
*

In other words, it's the same as flying a 737ng sim with an email about the stabilizer.

Man no wonder you guys are losing out in the value chain.

MAGAMan-X
post Jan 15 2020, 07:29 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(limeuu @ Jan 15 2020, 06:22 PM)
Your ignorance is amazing....lol
*
QUOTE(creactz @ Jan 15 2020, 06:29 PM)
What weed u smoking? seems more and more retard.
*
Wow look at all the pilots in this thread!

QUOTE(kkboy @ Jan 15 2020, 07:19 PM)
The pilots couldn’t disable it in time or at all

If this material had been part of a training, the crashes would have been avoided.
*

So the training material is 737ng sim + instructions on rebooting a software.

QUOTE(kkboy @ Jan 15 2020, 07:23 PM)
Duno what bitnes u in but sell industrial  machines also have to provide training how to use lah, especially if requested by customer.
*
If industrial machines produce model A and then next time they produce model A+ and say it's the same but here is the instructions to reboot a feature, do you need an entire training on model A+?

In that case, I suggest you all go back to driving school each time you change car.
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 15 2020, 07:37 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(limeuu @ Jan 15 2020, 07:30 PM)
Therein lies the reason for the disaster, and what caused the slide in Boeing technology.....

"Value chain".....
*
Or a simple a communication problem. Learn how to look for root cause instead of blame la

QUOTE(limeuu @ Jan 15 2020, 07:33 PM)
I was waiting for the "drive car" analogy....

Here it comes....

Yes, pilots actually go back to driving school when switching aircrafts....it's called conversion....
*
We're talking about the same aircraft here.
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 15 2020, 11:35 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(limeuu @ Jan 15 2020, 08:22 PM)
Ah....that's the point..... Boeing wants people to think it's the same....it's not....

When the Ng was launched in 97, pilots needed to undergo conversion training....because of significant cockpit differences....

However, the more advanced a320 changed the game maintaining the same operations across the family 319/320/321/CEO/neo.....thus allowing pilots to be rated to fly all of them....that fact helps sell a lot of 320s (not to mention close similarity with the 330/340 as well, making conversion easy)....

So Boeing wants the same "value chain" to sell the max.....

Except the max had one big problem: engine too big for the low wings.... solution: put it in front.....

Guess what happens to the centre of gravity when you move 2 heavy engines forward?.....

Good "value chains"?.....lol
*
I tire of this nonsense being thrown about

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_MAX
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion_Air_Flight_610

Basically, a co pilot who never took the sim already briefed the crew how to fix the malfunction, but the next crew failed to heed the advice, and because of lousy pilot skills, crashed the plane. I'm not saying Boeing is not at fault (never did) but you can't deny that a training sim is unnecessary, as Boeing also issued an operational guide to inform pilots.

You also seem to be obsessed with the words "value chain", not only do you not know how you use them, you had demonstrated you can't add value to the discussion proving me right in my judgement that you have not moved up the value chain. Being too busy finding fault can do that to people.

This post has been edited by MAGAMan-X: Jan 15 2020, 11:36 PM
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 16 2020, 02:01 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(limeuu @ Jan 16 2020, 12:33 AM)
Rubbish.....

Boeing never inform pilots.of the mcas....

An intrinsic defect in the aircraft to be corrected by a co-pilot's advice?....seriously? That's how you would solve this problem?

Would a sim training avoid the crashes?.... subsequent SIM simulation crashes.....because pilots reaction to mcas was different from Boeing's expectation.....so it may certainly pick up problems with pilot reactions....

Finding fault?....me?....Why would the whole world ground all maxs, if it's not at fault?....I didn't ground them....

As to value chain....its obsession with the whole idea that caused Boeing to keep modifying an aged frame instead of a new aircraft....even to the extend a /k discussion needs to "move up the value chain".....lol
*
Your ignorance is amazing.... lol
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 16 2020, 04:27 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(ladytarot99 @ Jan 16 2020, 04:53 AM)
You keeps on bising pasal training and challenging others... if the pilot were well trained, of course it would make a big different.

FYI.. Training, familiarisation, technical and support always part of the sales and purchase agreement AFAIK.

This is small part of agreement that mentioned about the customer support, maintenance and flight training upon the purchased of 737NG..

CUSTOMER SUPPORT DOCUMENT
PART 1: BOEING MAINTENANCE AND FLIGHT TRAINING
                   
PROGRAMS; OPERATIONS ENGINEERING SUPPORT

1.    Boeing Training Programs.

      1.1 Boeing will provide maintenance training and flight training programs
to support the introduction of a specific model of aircraft into service. The
training programs will consist of general and specialized courses and will be
described in a Supplemental Exhibit to the applicable purchase agreement.

      1.2 Boeing will conduct all training at Boeing's primary training facility
for the model of aircraft purchased unless otherwise agreed.

      1.3 All training will be presented in the English language. If translation
is required, Customer will provide interpreters.

      1.4 Customer will be responsible for all expenses of Customer's personnel.
Boeing will transport Customer's personnel between their local lodging and
Boeing's training facility.

2.    Training Planning Conferences.

      Customer and Boeing will conduct planning conferences approximately 12
months before the scheduled delivery month of the first aircraft of a model to
define and schedule the maintenance and flight training programs.

3.    Operations Engineering Support.

      3.1 As long as an aircraft purchased by Customer from Boeing is operated
by Customer in scheduled revenue service, Boeing will provide operations
engineering support. Such support will include:

            3.1.1 assistance with the analysis and preparation of performance
data to be used in establishing operating practices and policies for Customer's
operation of aircraft;

            3.1.2 assistance with interpretation of the minimum equipment list,
the definition of the configuration deviation list and the analysis of
individual aircraft performance;

            3.1.3 assistance with solving operational problems associated with
delivery and route-proving flights;

            3.1.4 information regarding significant service items relating to
aircraft performance or flight operations; and

            3.1.5 if requested by Customer, Boeing will provide operations
engineering support during an aircraft ferry flight.

4.    Training at a Facility Other Than Boeing's.

      If requested by Customer, Boeing will conduct the classroom portions of
the maintenance and flight training (except for the Performance Engineer
training courses) at a mutually acceptable alternate training site, subject to
the following conditions:

      4.1 Customer will provide acceptable classroom space, simulators (as
necessary for flight training) and training equipment required to present the
courses;

      4.2 Customer will pay Boeing's then-current per diem charge for each
Boeing instructor for each day, or fraction thereof, that the instructor is away
from their home location, including travel time;

      4.3 Customer will reimburse Boeing for the actual costs of round-trip
transportation for Boeing's instructors and the shipping costs of training
Materials between the primary training facility and the alternate training site;

      4.4 Customer will be responsible for all taxes, fees, duties, licenses,
permits and similar expenses incurred by Boeing and its employees as a result of
Boeing's providing training at the alternate site or incurred as a result of
Boeing providing revenue service training; and

      4.5 Those portions of training that require the use of training devices
not available at the alternate site will be conducted at Boeing's facility or at
some other alternate site.

5.    General Terms and Conditions.

      5.1 Boeing flight instructor personnel will not be required to work more
than 5 days per week, or more than 8 hours in any one 24-hour period, of which
not more than 5 hours per 8-hour workday will be spent in actual flying. These
foregoing restrictions will not apply to ferry assistance or revenue service
training services, which will be governed by FAA rules and regulations.

      5.2 NORMAL LINE MAINTENANCE is defined as line maintenance that Boeing
might reasonably be expected to furnish for flight crew training at Boeing's
facility, and will include ground support and aircraft storage in the open, but
will not include provision of spare parts. Boeing will provide Normal Line
Maintenance services for any
aircraft while the aircraft is used for flight crew training at Boeing's
facility in accordance with the Boeing Maintenance Plan (Boeing document
D6-xxxxxx) and the Repair Station Operation and Inspection Manual (Boeing
document D6-xxxxx), which terms are available to Customer upon reasonable
request. Customer will provide such services if flight crew training is
conducted elsewhere. Regardless of the location of such training, Customer will
be responsible for providing all maintenance items (other than those included in
Normal Line Maintenance) required during the training, including, but not
limited to, fuel, oil, landing fees and spare parts. Boeing will assist Customer
with purchase of any such items, at no additional cost to Customer.

      5.3 If the training is based at Boeing's facility, and the aircraft is
damaged during such training, Boeing will make all necessary repairs to the
aircraft as promptly as possible. Customer will pay Boeing's reasonable charge,
including the price of parts and materials, for making the repairs. If Boeing's
estimated labor charge for the repair exceeds $25,000, Boeing and Customer will
enter into an agreement for additional services before beginning the repair
work.

      5.4 If the flight training is based at Boeing's facility, several airports
in surrounding states may be used, at Boeing's option. Unless otherwise agreed
in the flight training planning conference, it will be Customer's responsibility
to make arrangements for the use of such airports.

      5.5 If Boeing agrees to make arrangements on behalf of Customer for the
use of airports for flight training, Boeing will pay on Customer's behalf any
landing fees charged by any airport used in conjunction with the flight
training. Boeing will submit to Customer an invoice for any such landing fees
Boeing has paid on Customer's behalf, approximately 60 days after flight
training is completed, when all landing fee charges have been received and
verified. Customer will pay to Boeing within 30 days of the date of the invoice.

      5.6 If requested by Boeing, in order to provide the flight training or
ferry flight assistance, Customer will make available to Boeing an aircraft
after delivery to familiarize Boeing instructor or ferry flight crew personnel
with such aircraft. If flight of the aircraft is required for any Boeing
instructor or ferry flight crew member to maintain an FAA license for flight
proficiency or landing currency, Boeing will be responsible for the costs of
fuel, oil, landing fees and spare parts attributable to that portion of the
flight.

      5.7 If any part of the training described in Article 1.1 of this Exhibit
is not used by Customer within 12 months after the delivery of the last aircraft
under the relevant purchase agreement, Boeing will not be obligated to provide
such training.
VS
Boeing 737Max

CUSTOMER SUPPORT VARIABLES relating to BOEING MODEL 737 MAX AIRCRAFT
Customer and Boeing will conduct planning conferences approximately twelve (12) months prior to delivery of the first Aircraft, or as mutually agreed, in order to develop and schedule a customized Customer Support Program to be furnished by Boeing in support of the Aircraft.
The customized Customer Services Program will be based upon and equivalent to the entitlements summarized below.

1. Maintenance Training.
1.1 Mechanical/Power Plant Course; one (1) class of fifteen (15) students;
1.2 Electrical Systems Course; one (1) class of fifteen (15) students;
1.3 Avionics Systems Course; one (1) class of fifteen (15) students;
1.4 Aircraft Rigging Course; one (1) class of six (6) students;
1.5 Advanced Composite Repair Course; one (1) class of eight (8) students.
1.6 Training materials will be provided to each student. In addition, one set of training materials as used in Boeing’s training program, including visual aids, Computer Based Training Courseware, instrument panel wall charts, text/graphics, video programs, etc. will be provided for use in Customer’s own training program.
2. Flight Training.
2.1 Boeing will provide one classroom course to acquaint up to eight (8) students (four (4) flight crews) with operational, systems and performance differences between Customer’s newly-purchased Aircraft and an aircraft of the same model currently operated by Customer.
2.2 Training materials will be provided to each student. In addition, one set of training materials as used in Boeing’s training program, including Computer Based Training Courseware, instrument panel wall charts, Flight Attendant Manuals, etc. will be provided for use in Customer’s own training program. Customer is authorized to duplicate and use Boeing provided training materials to train Customer’s personnel in their own training program, it being understood that revision service for these materials is not provided by Boeing.
TLDR = Yes, as the buyer, you have every single right to get/request full training and operational systems course of your newly-purchased aircraft From the Seller/Manufacturer!!
The staffs who involved in those conversations, not only being  RUDE.. They are also GUILTY!

#DoneDakwah
#Legal disclaimer = @LadyTarot99 makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the information, content, materials included on this comment and @LadyTarot99 will not be liable for any financial or legal damages arising from This Ultimately, all Of my comment are understood to be for entertainment purposes only.
*
Interesting, I actually read every sentence. So has Lion Air pilots already gone through that one round of training? Also it doesn't say in the contract it has to be flight sim training, unless "classroom course" includes flight sim.

Going back to the crash, there was a Lion Air pilot who already informed the crew on the bug and how to fix the bug the day before the crash. So why is one pilot competent but the other pilot is not?

Again this sounds like a witch-hunt against Boeing because they were rude. Kinda like how Trump haters support terrorists because they hate Trump.

This post has been edited by MAGAMan-X: Jan 16 2020, 04:28 PM
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 16 2020, 06:48 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(ladytarot99 @ Jan 16 2020, 06:05 PM)
That’s the reason why B*eing is at fault.  ....” From its inception, Boeing’s 737 Max was designed to save airlines the expense of training their pilots on flight simulators. During the initial approval of the plane and after two crashes killed 346 people last year, Boeing argued in conversations with the Federal Aviation Administration that simulator training was not necessary.

Now, after a worldwide grounding has cost the company billions of dollars over nearly 10 months and caused it to temporarily halt the production of the Max, Boeing has reversed course. On Tuesday, the company said it would recommend that pilots train in flight simulators before flying the Max.” NY times.

No SIM training on MAX because Boeing never provide and thinks that unnecessary. Now statements putar halim. And the worst part, when the buyer requested, they laugh at them... this is not cheap Bentl*y or Ferr*ri.. This is d*mn aeroplane!!! I can’t brain their staffs could made fun of it...
Meanwhile,
Sim training most likely always been part of the “Seller Flight Training Program” in the past.
......”3.1 Flight Crew Training Course.

Transition training for 6 flight crews (12 pilots); The training will consist of grounds school (utilizing computer based training), fixed base simulator, full flight simulator and actual aircraft training on Customer's Aircraft.

3.2 Flight Dispatcher Training Course.

Flight Dispatcher training; 5 Days, up to 10 people

3.3 Flight Attendant Training Course.

Flight Attendant training; 3 Days, up to 20 people

3.4 Performance Engineer Training Courses.

Performance Engineer Training; will be provided at Seller's facility, up to 5 people....”
Regarding your question about Lion air’s pilot about how, what, why, who.... I can’t answer, I’m not working for lion air, nor owned the company. Please contact lion air directly if you want further/details info..
And it’s not a witch-hunt!!!! 346 passengers killed...! And they are at fault, the company, the employees, because not only failed to address the changes, and provide necessary training, they’re t*lk sh*t when they should be professional. I bet, you’ll never understand till the karma knock you hard #SMH
#Legal disclaimer = @LadyTarot99 makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the information, content, materials included on this comment and @LadyTarot99 will not be liable for any financial or legal damages arising from This Ultimately, all Of my comment are understood to be for entertainment purposes only.
*
Lion air is not only the ones who bought the airplane, and there is clearly a difference in outcome when it came to competency of pilots

But this is a situation that people are judging Boeing guilty based on internal communication, rather than the malfunction.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion_Air_Flight_610
MAGAMan-X
post Jan 16 2020, 09:35 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
764 posts

Joined: Apr 2019


QUOTE(ladytarot99 @ Jan 16 2020, 08:47 PM)
Whatever you want to say lahhh... if your comments really matters, go flip the table in front of FAA.
*
Same goes for yours, pretty sure Boeing will get away with it

Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0143sec    0.32    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 08:59 PM