Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
RANKING : Asean best infrastructure for transport
|
frossonice
|
Jul 26 2019, 02:07 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Stigonboard @ Jul 26 2019, 01:33 PM) Its the same all over the world The infra is better where there is economic importance Like in EM most good public infra is in Kuching, Miri or Bintulu and that is due to the cities being an economic centre Just a suggestion. Why not break up those 2 states into a few more states since they are basically way bigger than the whole peninsular with 9 states plus 2 f.t. This way, development can be spread more evenly since those new states will get their own specific budget to develop their states. How? Well, since both states always claim that they are countries within a country, just raise the status of their division/districts into states with equal status to peninsular states while both 'countries' keep their status as countries within a country. This post has been edited by frossonice: Jul 26 2019, 02:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
pretty23
|
Jul 26 2019, 02:20 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Stigonboard @ Jul 26 2019, 02:00 PM) You compare a city state that size like our own Putrajaya with a big country like Malaysia of course la Compare sure need to voice out the different. Like SG GDP almost equal to Malaysia but population only 17% of Malaysia. Why err? Malaysia people more stupid or lazy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
lucifer_666
|
Jul 26 2019, 02:24 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(frossonice @ Jul 26 2019, 02:07 PM) Just a suggestion. Why not break up those 2 states into a few more states since they are basically way bigger than the whole peninsular with 9 states plus 2 f.t. This way, development can be spread more evenly since those new states will get their own specific budget to develop their states. How? Well, since both states always claim that they are countries within a country, just raise the status of their division/districts into states with equal status to peninsular states while both 'countries' keep their status as countries within a country. And their CM becomes co-PM ala Singapore in 63-65, while their TYT becomes agong? Alternatively can always combine the whole peninsular state as one Malayan superstate. That way the development budget goes three-way, no? This post has been edited by lucifer_666: Jul 26 2019, 02:26 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSMPPJ
|
Jul 26 2019, 02:30 PM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(Stigonboard @ Jul 26 2019, 01:48 PM) But their roads are well maintained and got good coverage and they have decent airport for a country that quite small Ya. Then when u masuk limbang or miri terus loophole everywhere
|
|
|
|
|
|
frossonice
|
Jul 26 2019, 02:31 PM
|
|
QUOTE(lucifer_666 @ Jul 26 2019, 02:24 PM) And their CM becomes co-PM ala Singapore in 63-65, while their TYT becomes agong? Alternatively can always combine the whole peninsular state as one Malayan superstate. That way the development budget goes three-way, no? In this case, bigger is not better. The smaller the region, the more focus development can be. If say Sarawak do get 20% oil royalty claim, I bet they going foucs thier spending on developed area more and less on other areas. By splitting it, Sarawak as a nation is obliged to give equal treatment to her states. Just a theory here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
lucifer_666
|
Jul 26 2019, 02:33 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(frossonice @ Jul 26 2019, 02:31 PM) In this case, bigger is not better. The smaller the region, the more focus development can be. If say Sarawak do get 20% oil royalty claim, I bet they going foucs thier spending on developed area more and less on other areas. By splitting it, Sarawak as a nation is obliged to give equal treatment to her states. Just a theory here. Not necessarily so. Didn't see much development in Perlis or Labuan. Size is often just a convenient excuse for imbalanced development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
frossonice
|
Jul 26 2019, 02:37 PM
|
|
QUOTE(lucifer_666 @ Jul 26 2019, 02:33 PM) Not necessarily so. Didn't see much development in Perlis or Labuan. Size is often just a convenient excuse for imbalanced development. For me, Perlis is actually pretty well developed for a small state with smallish population. Again, just a theory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
lucifer_666
|
Jul 26 2019, 02:41 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(frossonice @ Jul 26 2019, 02:37 PM) For me, Perlis is actually pretty well developed for a small state with smallish population. Again, just a theory. I don't know though. As far a Perlis goes, a small state with international border crossing... It does seems to be under-developed, considering the potential it has.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSStigonboard
|
Jul 26 2019, 06:02 PM
|
|
QUOTE(pretty23 @ Jul 26 2019, 02:20 PM) Compare sure need to voice out the different. Like SG GDP almost equal to Malaysia but population only 17% of Malaysia. Why err? Malaysia people more stupid or lazy? SG is one of the best country of the world in term of development and competitiveness even beating other developed European countries
|
|
|
|
|
|
Milupa
|
Jul 26 2019, 06:10 PM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(Stigonboard @ Jul 26 2019, 12:57 PM) The transport infrastructure ranking involved studies done on roads, highway, airports, rail system  Again .. mana certain /k favorite Thailand?? all I care is Majulah Singapura
|
|
|
|
|
|
kkk8787
|
Jul 26 2019, 06:13 PM
|
|
QUOTE(msacras @ Jul 26 2019, 01:30 PM) Another gosok bird2 ranking. Come EM see, public infrastructures are close to non-existence. I spent years in Sabah. Well if you have been to places like Aberdeen and such, we are not that bad actually. You cant compare big towns to Sabah la have to compare like Inverness, and so on, similar towns
|
|
|
|
|
|
LKSA Expressway
|
Jul 27 2019, 10:35 PM
|
New Member
|
Not accurate. Thailand road conditions are much better and no loophole.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ykj
|
Jul 27 2019, 10:40 PM
|
|
Thailand has 55% more land area than Malaysia. Population also more than doubled than Malaysia yang suka syiok sendiri.
Macam mana now?
This post has been edited by ykj: Jul 27 2019, 10:41 PM
|
|
|
|
|