The transport infrastructure ranking involved studies done on roads, highway, airports, rail system





Again .. mana certain /k favorite Thailand??

Tengah masat...

Last night baru kena angkut by police maybe. Wait a bit when release then he will come here

Another gosok bird2 ranking.

Come EM see, public infrastructures are close to non-existence.

wow!
malaysia bigger than brunei.
still no 2.
amazing!

mana myanmar?

Its the same all over the world

The infra is better where there is economic importance

Like in EM most good public infra is in Kuching, Miri or Bintulu and that is due to the cities being an economic centre

Myanmar doesnt allow their country to be included in the WEF report

Ooo.... thanks

I hope kena angkut in Thailand

He will brought in via tuk tuk over bumpy road and then will learn how hospitable the Thai police and prison facilities compared to MY

Inb4. Survey paid by government..

young ppl go Thailand become slave.

LKSA Expressway amik kau butthurt

beli la ky jelly

Brunei? Not even got bus lol!

Hang ni plots kuat Negara sendiri ni....chill lah

But their roads are well maintained and got good coverage and they have decent airport for a country that quite small

and muara-temburong sea-link is completing soon

Why huge gap between No1 and No2 ?

You compare a city state that size like our own Putrajaya with a big country like Malaysia of course la

Why they dunwan bus

Just a suggestion. Why not break up those 2 states into a few more states since they are basically way bigger than the whole peninsular with 9 states plus 2 f.t. This way, development can be spread more evenly since those new states will get their own specific budget to develop their states.

How? Well, since both states always claim that they are countries within a country, just raise the status of their division/districts into states with equal status to peninsular states while both 'countries' keep their status as countries within a country.

This post has been edited by frossonice: Jul 26 2019, 02:10 PM

Compare sure need to voice out the different.

Like SG GDP almost equal to Malaysia but population only 17% of Malaysia. Why err? Malaysia people more stupid or lazy?

And their CM becomes co-PM ala Singapore in 63-65, while their TYT becomes agong?

Alternatively can always combine the whole peninsular state as one Malayan superstate. That way the development budget goes three-way, no?

This post has been edited by lucifer_666: Jul 26 2019, 02:26 PM

Ya. Then when u masuk limbang or miri terus loophole everywhere

In this case, bigger is not better. The smaller the region, the more focus development can be.

If say Sarawak do get 20% oil royalty claim, I bet they going foucs thier spending on developed area more and less on other areas. By splitting it, Sarawak as a nation is obliged to give equal treatment to her states. Just a theory here.

Not necessarily so.

Didn't see much development in Perlis or Labuan.

Size is often just a convenient excuse for imbalanced development.

For me, Perlis is actually pretty well developed for a small state with smallish population. Again, just a theory.

I don't know though.

As far a Perlis goes, a small state with international border crossing... It does seems to be under-developed, considering the potential it has.

SG is one of the best country of the world in term of development and competitiveness even beating other developed European countries

all I care is Majulah Singapura

I spent years in Sabah. Well if you have been to places like Aberdeen and such, we are not that bad actually. You cant compare big towns to Sabah la have to compare like Inverness, and so on, similar towns

Not accurate. Thailand road conditions are much better and no loophole.

Thailand has 55% more land area than Malaysia. Population also more than doubled than Malaysia yang suka syiok sendiri.

Macam mana now?

This post has been edited by ykj: Jul 27 2019, 10:41 PM